MEETING: COMMISSIONERS MEETING at Mon, Nov 03, 09:00 AM

County Sources

Packet Contents

AI Information

MEETING SUMMARY: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners

MEETING DATE: November 3, 2025

Commissioner District Position
Heidi Eisenhour D1 Chair
Greg Brotherton D2 Vice-Chair
Kate Dean D3 Member

Public Comment on LTAC Awards Deliberations

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:02:12–00:04:32
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (General Public Comment)
  • Categories: budgeting, other

Topic Summary

A member of the public commented on the recent Long-Term Advisory Committee (LTAC) awards deliberation process, praising the committee's extensive effort but criticizing the final session as rushed, resulting in arbitrary cuts and a truncated public comment period. The speaker requested the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) encourage the LTAC to revisit and stand behind their final funding decisions.

Key Discussion Points

  • Caitlin Friedman (Quilcy) thanked Commissioner Dudley and the LTAC committee for 12 hours of presentations and deliberations across four sessions (00:02:17–00:02:37).
  • Ms. Friedman noted a "time crunch at the end of the final deliberation Day," leading to funding cuts (00:02:53–00:03:00).
  • The public comment period during that deliberation was closed 17 seconds after opening, and subsequent hand raises were not acknowledged (00:03:00–00:03:14).
  • The final cuts felt "targeted, rushed, and arbitrary," specifically referencing a 10% cut to the Bilstein Historical Museum funding request (00:03:39–00:03:45).
  • Ms. Friedman asked the BOCC to encourage the LTAC board members to take additional time to "make sure that they stand behind their final cuts" (00:04:10–00:04:18).

Public Comments

  • Caitlin Friedman (Quilcy): Expressed gratitude for the time spent by the LTAC committee (12 hours) but urged for longer public comment periods and reconsideration of the "targeted, rushed, and arbitrary" 10% funding cut to the Bilstein Historical Museum (00:02:12–00:04:32).

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • The discussion focused on a 10% funding cut to the Bilstein Historical Museum request (00:03:39).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Commissioner Eisenhour responded, acknowledging numerous "lessons learned" and stating that the LTAC will meet again due to slightly inaccurate calculations made after the previous meeting (00:17:28–00:20:38).
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [LTAC/Commissioner Eisenhour]: Set a date for an additional meeting to re-vet the funding calculations, with email notification sent to all applicants (01:47:48–0:21:47).

Public Comment on Unauthorized Encampment Removal Policy

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:04:50–00:11:42
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (General Public Comment)
  • Categories: services, public safety, ordinances

Topic Summary

Three speakers provided comment regarding the revised Unauthorized Encampment Removal Policy, which was scheduled for a continued workshop later in the day. The core theme of all comments was the high importance of ensuring "no displacement without placement" of unhoused individuals. Specific concerns were raised about lack of clarity in definitions, inconsistencies within the relevant code (1.5), and the process for maintaining a list of available shelter space.

Key Discussion Points

  • Vicki Sontag (District 1) requested clarity on the displacement policy, stating the need for "no displacement without placement" (00:05:46–00:05:53).
  • Ms. Sontag questioned provision 1.5 of the relevant code, which she found unclear regarding consistent use of temporary housing facilities and authorized encampment requirements (00:05:53–00:06:58).
  • She noted that authorized encampment requirements (like monitoring behavior near public parks or libraries) may be inconsistent with the displacement policy's intent (00:06:58–00:07:17).
  • Ms. Sontag urged the BOCC to look at having the County Sheriff's Department maintain the list of shelter availability, rather than the County Health Department, to reduce barriers in handing out notices (00:08:16–00:08:43).
  • Sonder Hunt (Well Organized of Jefferson County) agreed with the principle of "no displacement without placement" before clearing a non-hazard encampment (00:09:53–0:10:03).
  • Ms. Hunt requested transparent outcomes reporting, specifically annual data that includes voluntary demographic information, shelter offers, placements, outcomes, hazard designations, and impacts of emphasis areas (00:10:10–0:10:32).
  • Sunny Allen (Quilstein) shared "full support" for the recommendations and concerns expressed by Vicki Sontag and Sonder Hunt (00:14:24–0:14:28).

Public Comments

  • Vicki Sontag (District 1): Expressed appreciation for the commissioners' work but emphasized clarification is needed for the policy to allow no displacement without placement, suggesting the Sheriff's Department hold the shelter availability list (00:05:19–00:09:01).
  • Sonder Hunt (Well Organized of Jefferson County): Thanked the BOCC for the revised policy's progress towards "compassion, public health alignment, and clarity," reiterating the need for guaranteed placement and transparent data reporting (00:09:26–01:11:42).
  • Sunny Allen (Quilstein): Supported the comments and recommendations made by Sontag and Hunt (00:14:24–01:14:32).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The public comments referenced the Displacement Policy and a workshop scheduled for later in the day.
  • A specific code provision, 1.5 in the relevant code, was discussed regarding definitions for "temporary use" and "available space."

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Vicki Sontag suggested having the County Sheriff's Department maintain the shelter availability list instead of the County Health Department (00:08:16–00:08:24).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Commissioner Brotherton acknowledged the need to reconcile the inconsistency in section 1.5 and an accompanying Section 8.1 during the forthcoming workshop (00:23:16–0:23:41). Commissioner Eisenhour thanked the public for the "focused attention" and noted the plan to look at all supporting code (00:22:12–0:24:12).
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps: The topic was scheduled for a continuation in a workshop later in the day.

Public Comment on South Shore Road and Tourism Plan

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:12:02–00:15:41
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (General Public Comment)
  • Categories: infrastructure, planning, operations, contracts

Topic Summary

Two speakers addressed disparate issues. Ed Bowen requested an update on the South Shore Road issue and efforts to contact the National Park Service, while Shelley Yarnell-Brennan urged the Commissioners to focus the County's tourism plan strictly on Jefferson County assets rather than broader peninsula or national marketing.

Key Discussion Points

  • Ed Bowen (West Jefferson) requested a report on new movement regarding the South Shore Road issue (00:12:17–0:12:24).
  • Mr. Bowen reported that the National Park Service (NPS) is "totally quiet," not responding to calls, emails, or letters (00:12:24–0:12:37).
  • He asked the Commissioners to request that a state representative, who is scheduled to be in Port Townsend on November 6th, hold a separate meeting in West Jefferson itself (00:12:44–0:13:14).
  • Mr. Bowen noted that the recording from the Hoe Reservation community event has not been posted to the County website (00:13:18–0:13:42).
  • Shelley Yarnell-Brennan recommended the Commissioners take a "serious look" at the Jefferson County tourism plan (00:15:00–0:15:04).
  • She advocated for a focus on Jefferson County itself, rather than "the peninsula," and criticized "old school" marketing tactics like bus signs in Seattle (00:15:20–0:15:37).

Public Comments

  • Ed Bowen (West Jefferson): Requested updates on South Shore Road, criticized the NPS's lack of response, and asked for a state representative meeting to be held in West Jefferson (00:12:02–0:13:45).
  • Shelley Yarnell-Brennan: Urged the BOCC to rework the County Tourism plan to focus internally on making the county "shine" for tourism (00:15:00–0:15:41).

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Ed Bowen suggested asking the state representative to hold a meeting in West Jefferson instead of just Port Townsend (00:13:06–0:13:14).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Commissioner Brotherton reported receiving a letter of support from the Quinault Nation regarding the South Shore issue (00:24:12–0:24:31). Commissioner Dean acknowledged the work of Public Works staff, specifically Eric Uthma, in engaging FHWA concerning road repair financing (00:25:09–0:25:31). The need to conduct board and committee review on an upcoming agenda was noted due to a resignation (00:28:33–0:28:45).
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Commissioner Brotherton/Staff]: Follow up on attracting a meeting of the state representative to West Jefferson (Implied).
  • - [Staff]: Post the recording of the Hoe Reservation community event to the County website (Implied).
  • - [BOCC]: Schedule upcoming agenda item for board and committee review due to vacancies (00:28:33–0:28:45).
  • - [BOCC/County Administrator]: Review the tourism plan and DMO question, possibly through an RFP process (00:23:00–0:23:10).

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:26:54–00:29:53
  • Agenda Item: Consent Agenda
  • Categories: contracts, services, personnel, budgeting, infrastructure

Topic Summary

The Board discussed items on the Consent Agenda, including pending hearing notices for taxes and housing plans, the need for letters of support for Mason County PUD No. 1, personnel changes, and service agreements. The Board unanimously approved the Consent Agenda.

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Eisenhour noted the Consent Agenda contained notice settings for several important public hearings: the five-year Housing and Affordable Housing Plan, Ad Valorem Tax Levies, and the Road Levy diversion (00:27:10–0:27:33).
  • Commissioner Brotherton reminded the Board that letters of support for the Mason County PUD grants (Item #13 in supporting materials) are due today (November 3), as the projects benefit South County electrical customers (00:27:57–0:28:17).
  • The resignation of Gary Maxfield from the Traffic in Transit board indicated a need to schedule future board and committee reviews due to vacancies (00:28:25–0:28:50).
  • Commissioner Dean highlighted the importance of inter-departmental cooperation and noted the contract agreement for case management training for public health staff by Discovery Behavioral Health Care (00:29:07–0:29:41). This training is for the "voluntary compliance code program, or the Compassion Project" (00:29:36–0:29:41).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Resignation from Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC): Gary Maxfield resigned as the Transit Representative on October 16, 2025, due to no longer being employed by Jefferson County Transit (ends unexpired term on July 8, 2026).
  • Setting Public Hearing for 2026 Ad Valorem Tax Levies: The item sets the hearing date for November 17, 2025, to discuss a proposed 1% increase in the General Fund, Road District, and Conservation Futures Levy, and continuing the diversion of $470,000 of the Road Levy for Traffic Law Enforcement.
  • Contract Approval for Behavioral Health Case Management (Alternative Enforcement Program): Approved a $9,500 contract with Discovery Behavioral Health for case management (8 hours/week at $30.00/hour) for the Alternative Enforcement Program, funded by the Foundation Public Health Service (Fund #127).
  • Contracts for IDD Services (Cascade Community Connections): Approved three contracts with Cascade Community Connections (sole provider):
    • Individual Supported Employment (IE): $299,798.40 to help clients gain integrated employment.
    • Community Inclusion (CI): $213,355.80 for integrated community work and skills development.
    • Group Supported Employment (GSE): $71,803.90 for short-term, supervised work in groups.
  • Contract for School-to-Work Outreach (Cascade Community Connections): Approved a $20,000 sole-source contract for outreach to increase enrollment of IDD students in the state School-to-Work program.
  • Contract for Birth-to-Three Outreach (First Step Family Support Center): Approved a $3,100 agreement for community outreach to families with children aged 0-3.
  • Interlocal Agreement for EV Charger Utility Easement: Approved an ILA with PUD No. 1 to grant an easement for relocated EV charging equipment (three Level 3 DC Fast Chargers, one Level 2) at the Tri-Area Community Center (no cost to County; revenue share expected).
  • Proclamations for Community Chorus, Family Caregiver Month, and Operation Green Light (Approved in separate motions).
  • Emergency Management Performance Grant (E25-232 Revised): Approved a revised $25,201 grant for the DEM (50% match from DEM Director Salary).

Financials

  • The need for signed letters of support for Mason County PUD #1 was noted (00:27:57).
  • A $470,000 Road Levy diversion was mentioned in the public hearing notices (00:27:24).
  • Approval of a $9,500 contract with Discovery Behavioral Health for case management for the voluntary compliance code program was supported (00:29:29).
  • Multiple contracts totaling over $589,000 for IDD services were included in the consent package.
  • The approval of the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) required a $25,201 contribution from the DEM Director's salary as a match (details available in supporting materials).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda as presented.
  • Vote: Unanimous. (00:29:50–0:29:53)
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Commissioners]: Sign and send letters of support for Mason County PUD No. 1 grants by end of day (00:27:57–0:28:17).
  • - [Staff/BOCC]: Publish public hearing notices for fiscal items and the 5-year housing plan (00:27:10–0:27:33).

Proclamation: 50th Anniversary of the Community Chorus of Port Townsend and East Jefferson County

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:32:32–00:34:52
  • Agenda Item: Proclamation
  • Categories: other

Topic Summary

The Board of County Commissioners heard testimony from current and charter members of the Community Chorus before reading and adopting a proclamation recognizing November 2025 as the 50th Anniversary of the organization.

Key Discussion Points

  • Jermaine Arthur and Marilyn Sturvick confirmed they were charter members, noting the chorus began in 1975 (00:31:06–00:31:17).
  • The Chorus has 125 singers ready to perform Handel's Messiah on November 22nd and 23rd at Chimicum Auditorium (00:31:38).
  • The proclamation was read, confirming the Chorus's 50th concert season, its provision of musical opportunities for all citizens, its cultural contributions, and its scholarships for college-bound students (00:32:55–00:34:10).
  • An error in the proclamation was noted (listing April instead of November for upcoming concerts) and staff committed to editing the official document (00:34:00–0:34:10).

Public Comments

  • Jermaine Arthur and Marilyn Sturvick (Community Chorus Members): Thanked the BOCC for the proclamation and noted the historical presence of the Chorus since 1975 (00:31:24).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Proclamation of 50th Anniversary of the Community Chorus: Official document recognizing the anniversary and acknowledging the Chorus's musical performances and scholarships.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • A date correction from April to November was noted in the reading of the concert dates (00:34:00).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve and adopt the proclamation as read.
  • Vote: Unanimous. (00:34:40–0:34:47)
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Staff]: Edit the proclamation to correct the concert month from April to November (00:34:00–0:34:10).
  • - [Commissioners/Chorus Members]: Sign the physical proclamation (00:34:22–0:34:26).

Proclamation: Family Caregiver Month

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:35:10–00:39:25
  • Agenda Item: Proclamation
  • Categories: services, other

Topic Summary

The Board heard from Denise, a representative from Public Health, acknowledging the importance of family caregiving. The Commissioners discussed the cultural shift toward family care due to economic necessity before reading and unanimously adopting the proclamation designating November 2025 as Family Caregiver Month.

Key Discussion Points

  • Denise (Public Health) emphasized the importance of family caregiving in the current economy, thanking families for caring for elderly or particular-need loved ones (00:35:10–0:35:42).
  • Commissioner Eisenhower questioned if there is a cultural shift toward multi-generational family care due to economic downturns (00:35:50–0:36:03).
  • Denise noted that more people cannot afford alternatives and are being cared for in family homes, attributing the change partly to necessity (00:36:37–0:36:52).
  • The proclamation was read, highlighting that caregivers provide "essential care and medical assistance," often sacrificing jobs or careers, and that workers and the economy suffer when difficult choices must be made (00:37:25–0:38:20).
  • Commissioner Dean acknowledged the critical contributions of hospice care to family caregivers (00:39:22–0:39:46).

Public Comments

  • Denise (Public Health): Presented the proclamation, thanking the community members dedicating time to family caregiving (00:35:10–0:35:42).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Proclamation of Family Caregiver Month: Official proclamation recognizing the indispensable care provided by family members and acknowledging the sacrifices and financial struggles associated with the role.

Financials

No financial information discussed, though economic necessity and cost of care were mentioned (00:35:50, 00:38:13).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve and adopt the proclamation.
  • Vote: Unanimous. (00:39:05–0:39:10)
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Staff/Public Health]: Follow up on resources available for caregivers and family supports within the community (00:39:59–0:40:20).

Proclamation: Operation Green Light for Veterans

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:40:57–00:44:51
  • Agenda Item: Proclamation
  • Categories: services, other

Topic Summary

The Board read and adopted a proclamation supporting "Operation Green Light for Veterans," an initiative encouraging the public and county facilities to display green lights from November 4-11, 2025, to honor veterans. A veteran in the audience commented on the challenges of transitioning from military to civilian life.

Key Discussion Points

  • John commented that the proclamation was well-written and noted that Veterans constitute less than 2% of the population who actually serve in the military (00:44:51–0:45:02).
  • John, a Vietnam-era veteran, spoke about the difficulty of transitioning from a combat zone to civilian life quickly (30 hours later), noting the process remains difficult at times (00:44:19–0:44:40).
  • The proclamation officially declares November 4–11, 2025, as Operation Green Light, recognizing veterans' sacrifices (00:42:40–0:43:17).
  • The proclamation highlights that 200,000 service members transition to civilian communities annually, and 44% to 72% experience high stress and high risk for suicide during their first year out of service (00:42:17–0:42:31).
  • Commissioner Dean confirmed that Facilities is ready to turn the courthouse clock green (00:43:31–0:43:37).

Public Comments

  • John (County Staff/Veteran): Thanked the board for the proclamation and shared personal experience regarding the difficulty of transition from military to civilian life (00:44:09–0:45:14).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Proclamation of Operation Green Light for Veterans: Official proclamation recognizing veterans' sacrifices and the challenges of military-to-civilian transition, encouraging the public display of green lights (November 4-11, 2025).

Financials

  • The proclamation stated no fiscal impact to the County (Supporting materials).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve and adopt the proclamation.
  • Vote: Unanimous. (00:43:17–0:43:24)
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Facilities]: Turn the courthouse clock green for November 4-11, 2025 (00:43:31–0:43:37).

Public Health Update: Respiratory Viruses and SNAP/WIC Funding Crisis

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:45:36–01:19:09
  • Agenda Item: Monthly Public Health Update
  • Categories: services, public safety, budgeting, other

Topic Summary

Dr. Berry provided an update on respiratory viruses (COVID-19 and influenza are surging; RSV is anticipated) and a critical update on federal funding crises affecting SNAP and WIC benefits. Dr. Berry answered questions about vaccine sequencing and reflected on lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic communications, including early messaging errors and the impact of school closures.

Key Discussion Points

  • Respiratory Virus Trends: COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations are downtrending, but influenza is starting to show up with a rise in emergency department visits and hospitalizations (00:46:02–0:46:12).
  • Vaccinations: The flu vaccine is widely available and recommended for everyone 6+ months. RSV vaccines are recommended for the very youngest, elders, and pregnant folks going into the season (00:46:49–0:48:04).
  • Vaccine Shortages: Local providers are reporting shortages in multiple childhood vaccines due to federal distribution problems (00:48:13–0:48:39). Dr. Berry encouraged parents to keep trying and noted the health department currently has vaccines (0:49:32–0:49:45).
  • Multiple Vaccines: Dr. Berry advised that getting COVID-19, flu, and RSV vaccines simultaneously is safe and recommended for convenience, though it slightly increases the risk of minor side effects (00:54:00–0:54:30).
  • SNAP Crisis: Dr. Berry highlighted the gravity of the fact that 42 million Americans lost SNAP benefits on November 1st due to the government shutdown and "priority decision-making" (00:50:18).
    • SNAP recipients are majority children, elderly, disabled, or working people who do not earn enough (00:51:05–0:51:26).
    • The average monthly benefit is $187, or $6 a day (00:56:29–0:56:34).
    • Dr. Berry urged the community to support local food banks and free pantries to fill the demand gap (00:52:20–0:52:30).
    • WIC funding for families who rely on formula is expected to run out by mid-to-late November (00:56:50–0:57:22).
  • Messaging Mistakes: Dr. Berry acknowledged that public health officials, including herself, made mistakes in early pandemic messaging, such as repeating the initial Surgeon General instruction that only healthcare professionals should wear masks (01:02:46–01:03:03).
  • School Closures: Dr. Berry expressed regret that early school closures, though effective for reducing transmission, caused "serious damage to kids" and working families, stating future caution would be warranted (01:04:00–01:04:06).
  • Political Nuance: Commissioner Brotherton differentiated between the scientific method's self-correcting nature and the difficulties that arise when political decision-making interacts with scientific rigor, noting that transparency is critical (01:05:32–01:07:06). Vice-Chair Dean recalled the Port Townsend School Board weighing these risks in deliberating when to reopen the high school (01:09:09–01:10:13).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • SNAP average monthly benefit: $187 ($6 per day) (00:56:29).
  • WIC funding is currently available through mid-to-late November (00:56:50).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Dr. Berry noted that legal action in D.C. triggered the federal administration to reinstate some SNAP benefits, but the amount and duration are unclear (00:55:33–0:55:51).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Information was received.
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [DEM/Public Health]: Continue advocating for resources to cover the food security gap caused by federal funding cuts (00:55:51–0:56:19).

Emergency Management Update: Road Closure Response and West End Partnership

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:11:13–01:18:39
  • Agenda Item: Department of Emergency Management Update
  • Categories: public safety, infrastructure, operations, services

Topic Summary

The DEM Director addressed a question regarding the county's plan for major road closures, outlining regional disaster preparedness efforts with state and federal partners, and gave an update on a new partnership meeting focused on improving emergency services for West Jefferson County residents.

Key Discussion Points

  • Major Road Closures (Highway 20/19): Director Bence explained that for localized issues (like the recent Highway 20/19 closure), there are secondary means (e.g., Discovery Road) (01:12:02–01:12:33).
  • Disaster Preparedness: The county's vulnerability due to limited ingress/egress (Hood Canal Bridge and Highway 101) requires extensive regional planning (01:12:56–01:13:03).
    • DEM has worked with the Navy to survey beachheads for landing critical supplies (01:13:34–01:13:41).
    • DEM operates a volunteer Disaster Air Response Team (DART) of single-engine aircraft pilots to fly in supplies if all roads are cut off (01:13:41–01:13:51).
  • Individual Preparedness: Bence stressed the importance for individuals to know their evacuation routes (three routes suggested based on volunteer experience) (01:14:06–01:15:08).
  • West End Services Meeting: A preliminary meeting was called by Forks City Attorney Rod Fleck with Forks, Clallam County, and the Ho Tribe to discuss emergency services in West Jefferson County (01:16:51–01:17:05).
    • West Jefferson County currently lacks a local fire department (01:17:17).
    • Goals include coordinating regional support and addressing fire services, especially as the Ho Tribe develops a new resiliency center and EOC (01:17:52–01:18:11).
  • Community Outreach: DEM is hosting a monthly outreach event at the Jefferson County Library on November 4th at 10:30 a.m., focusing on winter storm preparedness (01:15:20–01:16:10).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

The discussion focused on establishing collaborative, regional alternatives (Navy beachheads, DART aircraft) for disaster responses (01:13:20–01:13:51).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Information was received.
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Willie Bence/DEM]: Attend the meeting with Forks, Clallam County, and the Ho Tribe this week concerning West End emergency services (01:17:05–01:17:17).
  • - [DEM/Public Works/PUD]: Host the winter storm preparedness outreach event at the Jefferson County Library on November 4th at 10:30 a.m. (01:15:39–01:16:10).

County Administrator Briefing: RFPs and Critical Infrastructure

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:19:46–01:23:49
  • Agenda Item: County Administrator Briefing
  • Categories: contracts, services, operations, planning

Topic Summary

The County Administrator provided updates on three active Requests for Proposals (RFPs), noting two are moving forward (Thriving Community grants and lobbying services) and one (Community Center management) has been temporarily suspended to improve clarity and ensure a proper process.

Key Discussion Points

  • Thriving Community Small Grant Program RFP: The program closed on Halloween and received 6-10 proposals. Commissioner Eisenhower is assisting in the review process, alongside Grant Coordinator Amanda Gustaferson (01:20:00–01:20:27).
  • Lobbying Services RFP: Also received responses and staff will review them (01:20:34–01:20:48).
  • Community Center Management RFP (Brinnon, Quilcene, Tri-Area): The upcoming deadline (this week) has been suspended due to complex and thoughtful questions received from a prospective respondent, and concerns related to procedural elements (01:21:02–01:21:33).
    • Action: The county will temporarily suspend the process to issue another RFP with clarifying points and host a technical session for back-and-forth Q&A (01:21:43–01:22:00).
    • Interim Plan: Staff will contact the current manager, Holy Cath, to extend the expiring contract for 3 months (Q1 2026), prioritizing "do it right, not fast" (01:22:09–01:22:25).
  • Community Center Definition: Commissioner Brotherton stressed the need for a BOCC workshop to define the role and expectation of "community centers" in the county before the next RFP iteration to align expectations (01:23:00–01:23:30).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No specific financial information was discussed in this rapid briefing, other than references to the Thriving Community Grant allocations.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Staff determined that extending the current management agreement for Community Centers (Holy Cath) until April 1, 2026, was the best alternative to rushing the RFP process (01:22:09–01:22:42).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Information received.
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [BOCC/Staff]: Schedule a workshop to define expectations and a cohesive vision for the management of the three community centers prior to the next RFP issue (01:23:00–01:23:49).
  • - [County Administrator]: Redraft the RFP for Community Center management (01:21:43–01:22:00).
  • - [County Administrator]: Negotiate a 3-month extension with current provider Holy Cath (01:22:09–01:22:22).

Workshop: Economic Development Reports (NODC and EDC Team Jefferson)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:29:19–02:19:56
  • Agenda Item: Annual Report and Workshop by Local Economic Development Organizations
  • Categories: economic development, planning, infrastructure, services

Topic Summary

Karen Affeld (NODC) and David Ballif (EDC Team Jefferson) presented updates on their respective organizations, focusing on regional planning (CEDS) and local execution (EDC Strategic Plan). NODC highlighted the impact of federal funding instability (especially relating to Ag Business Advising loss) and the secured $35.6 million ReCompete grant. EDC emphasized a pivot toward becoming a central "front door" for business investment and outlined a new strategic plan focusing on bringing in new jobs and creating a county-wide brand.

Key Discussion Points

  • NODC Mission and Role: Affeld noted NODC's unique focus on sustainable development, including healthy environment and resilient communities, alongside economic development (01:31:09–01:32:04). The primary role is regional planning, having recently completed the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for 2026-2030 (01:32:10).
  • ReCompete Grant: NODC was involved in the development of the successful $35.6 million grant (one of six nationally), and NODC serves as project lead for the distressed "rural and remote communities" component (01:33:57–01:34:39).
  • Funding Instability: Federal funding losses led to the elimination of the Agricultural and Food Business Advising staff, indicating core operating funds are at risk due to the government shutdown and potential future program eliminations (01:37:32–01:49:04).
  • Coastal Resilience Fellow: NODC secured a fully-funded Sea Grant Coastal Resilience Fellow for two years to work on climate-related issues, including sea level rise, drought, and siting resilience hubs (01:41:31–01:42:26).
  • CEDS Goals: The 2026-2030 plan has four goals: Diversified, Resilient Economy; Opportunity and Prosperity for All (including housing/healthcare); Strengthened Infrastructure (including energy reliability); and Protected Cultural/Natural Assets (01:42:44–01:47:13).
  • EDC Strategic Pivot: Executive Director Ballif characterized the agency's new focus (for 2026-2027) as leading with "bringing new jobs and investments" to the county, acting as a "front door" and central fulcrum for economic development (02:08:58–02:10:21).
  • EDC Milestones: The EDC helped the Jefferson Timber Cooperative secure a $262,000 USDA Wood Innovations Grant and secured $50,000 for West Jefferson County marketing (AncientCoast.com) (02:05:15–02:05:45).
  • Business Advising: Over 400 engagements with 109 businesses to date in 2025, resulting in 51 new businesses and 73 new jobs, facilitating over $1 million in new loans (02:06:03–02:06:33).
  • New EDC Focus: Strategy includes surveying the most promising physical locations for industrial/economic development and building a cohesive county-wide brand on the EDC website for outside investors (02:10:29–02:14:14).
  • Thought Leadership: EDC plans a white paper benchmarking Jefferson County’s approach to job attraction against other Washington counties, led by Dr. Ray Sparrow (02:15:05–02:15:29).
  • Tourism: Affeld addressed the inclusion of Tourism in the CEDS, explaining it acknowledges the established nature of the industry and focuses on strategies to make tourism jobs year-round, high-wage, and focused on ecotourism/cultural tourism (02:01:15–02:02:18).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Annual Report and Workshop by Local Economic Development Organizations: Agenda item focused on reporting current activities, ReCompete involvement, and forthcoming strategic plans (CEDS 2026-2030 and EDC 2026-2027 Strategic Plan).

Financials

  • NODC secured a $35.6 million EDA ReCompete investment (01:33:57).
  • EDC facilitated over $1 million in new loans for local businesses (02:06:33).
  • NODC lost USDA Rural Business Development Grant funding for its Ag and Food Business Advising program (01:37:32).
  • Jefferson County provides NODC with $25,000 annually in funding (01:39:37).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • NODC is focusing more on environmental and energy resilience work due to the security of the Straight Ecosystem Recovery Network funding and the addition of the Coastal Resilience Fellow (01:50:24–01:50:45).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Information received.
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [EDC Team Jefferson]: Continue development and approval of the 2026-2027 Strategic Plan (02:09:29–02:09:35).
  • - [NODC/BOCC]: Final approval of the CEDS (2026-2030) pending the end of the federal government shutdown (01:35:14–01:35:23).
  • - [EDC/Dr. Ray Sparrow]: Develop white paper benchmarking county economic development approaches for guidance to local government (02:15:05–02:15:29).

Workshop: Updated Unauthorized Encampment Removal Policy

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:20:59–03:13:02
  • Agenda Item: Workshop Continuation on Updated Unauthorized Encampment Removal Policy
  • Categories: ordinances, public safety, human services, budgeting

Topic Summary

The Board held a continued workshop on the unauthorized encampment policy, hearing a presentation from Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Ariel Speser on revisions made since the previous session, specifically addressing public comments regarding mandatory alternate placement, refined definitions (low/no barrier shelters), and procedural fairness. The core deliberation focused on the policy's use of "may" vs. "must" regarding offering alternate placement, balancing the compassionate desire for "no displacement without placement" against the County’s statutory and fiscal constraints. The Board approved the ordinance with an acknowledgement that structural issues remain unaddressed.

Key Discussion Points

  • Legal Context (HB 1220): Staff confirmed that Jefferson County is compliant with HB 1220 (via Ordinance 05-0613-2022, JCC 18.20.385). Staff noted that compliance does not mandate providing alternative shelter or maintaining encampments (02:26:35–02:28:36).
  • "No Displacement Without Placement": Staff confirmed the revised policy does not mandate alternative shelter be available prior to removal, though the Board has the policy decision to require this (02:25:21–02:25:31).
  • Definitions: New definitions were added distinguishing "low barrier shelter" and "no barrier shelter" based on public comment (02:30:15–02:30:38).
  • Procedural Fairness: The notice period for removing non-obstructing encampments was extended to seven (7) calendar days (02:34:24–02:36:12).
  • Emphasis Areas: The policy requires mapping and BOCC approval for "Designated Emphasis Areas" (prohibited camping zones) (02:31:48–02:32:37).
  • Available Shelter List: Staff agreed to integrate the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office (JCSO) into the list of departments receiving the list of available shelter space maintained by Public Health (03:02:37–03:02:44).
  • The "May" Clause (Section 1.5): The main discussion focused on the clause allowing the County Administrator to authorize a temporary use permit for camping on county property if no shelter is available (02:31:48–02:54:10).
    • PAO Philip Hunsucker and County Administrator Josh Peters confirmed this is a "may" (discretionary, based on budget/capacity) not a "must" (mandatory commitment) (02:55:29–02:55:35, 02:53:15).
    • Josh Peters argued the County cannot commit to mandatory placement due to budget and staffing capacity constraints (e.g., operating a shelter requires a staff partner the County doesn't possess) (02:53:34–02:53:50).
  • Remaining Gap in Services: Commissioner Dean concluded that even with the new Caswell Brown Village (CBV) created in response to the fairgrounds encampment, the policy does not address the individuals who cannot thrive in low-barrier/CBV settings and who would continue to be displaced (02:57:41–0:58:34).
  • Transparency: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Speser agreed to ensure the reporting requirement specifies that demographic data is voluntary and that the reports detail the use of emphasis areas (03:00:00–0:00:32).

Public Comments

  • Sondra Hunt (Well Organized): Expressed disappointment that the policy does not include a "clause for removal without placement," stating there is a "true lack of available shelter" beds acknowledged by the Behavioral Health Consortium (03:06:17–03:06:53).
  • Julia (Winter Welcoming Center): Expressed appreciation that the policy will not chase away encampments unless they are dangerous, allowing her organization to approach unhoused populations without residents fearing visibility (03:08:46–03:09:16).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Workshop Continuation on Updated Unauthorized Encampment Removal Policy: The revised draft policy (Policy No. 02.10.23-01) with changes addressing public health, legal compliance, and a new property storage location (JCSO).
  • JCC 18.20.385 (Temporary Housing Facilities): The existing county provision governing temporary encampments; referenced repeatedly as the legal framework the discretion relates to (02:25:57–02:26:08).

Financials

  • The commitment to "no displacement without placement" was constrained by the County’s budget limitations and lack of required staff capacity to operate a shelter (02:53:34–02:53:50).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Staff Accepted Amendments (Oral): Edits to remove language that "privacy concern" in the reporting section (due to JCSO’s involvement) and correcting inconsistent plural/singular use ("collection companies") (03:02:44, 02:56:45–02:57:29).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve a resolution adopting the revised Unauthorized Encampment Removal Policy (Resolution repealing and replacing Policy #02.10.23-01). The motion was seconded (03:05:04–03:05:23).
  • Wait on Public Comment: The vote was paused to receive public comment (03:05:23).
  • Final Vote: The motion passed following public comment.
  • Vote: Ayes (3) (03:12:56).
  • Next Steps:
  • - [PAO/Staff]: Finalize the ordinance incorporating Scrivener's corrections, including editing the removal of the specific customer list language and inconsistencies in company plural/singular terms (03:02:24–03:02:44).
  • - [BOCC/City Council]: Joint special meeting on December 8, 2025, at 6 p.m. regarding the 5-Year Homeless and Affordable Housing Services Plan (03:11:13–03:11:45).

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:13:59–04:01:47
  • Agenda Item: 2026 Recommended Budget - General Fund Workshop
  • Categories: budgeting, personnel, services, financial

Topic Summary

The Finance Director, Judy Shepherd, delivered an update indicating the General Fund faces a $5.2 million deficit for Fiscal Year 2026. A 12% reduction in expenditures is required to achieve a state-mandated balanced budget. Staff noted that this reduction cannot be achieved without impacting personnel (salaries and benefits account for 63% of General Fund expenditures) and may require lay-offs and service cuts.

Key Discussion Points

  • Deficit and Mandate: FY2026 revenue is projected at $27 million, with expenditures at $32 million (including add requests). The resulting $5.2 million deficit necessitates a 12% expenditure reduction to reach a balanced budget and maintain a minimum reserve (03:17:12–03:18:07).
  • Current Year Woes: The 2025 budget is currently running a $5.8 million deficit (caused by appropriations and reduced timber revenue), which will severely reduce the starting fund balance for 2026 from $7.9 million to $2.8 million (03:20:08–03:21:03).
  • Impact of Cuts: Cuts likely require staff reduction, given that salaries and benefits constitute 63% of General Fund expenditures (Sheriff's budget is $9 million; non-departmental is $6.8 million) (03:22:12–03:23:43).
  • Budget Drivers: Major increasing costs include: $400,000 for insurance premiums (up 35%), public defense mandates (costing over $1 million with only $60,000 recovery), and internal IT/grants service costs ($1.7 million) (03:28:23–03:29:07).
  • Personnel Options: Josh Peters stated management is looking into creative options to meet the 12% target, including asking for voluntary separation, furloughs, or reduction in hours/work week (03:33:56–03:35:03). The Sheriff's Office, as an elected office, maintains agency over how it meets its reduction goal (03:52:33).
  • Services at Risk: Judy Shepherd warned cuts may impact services, referencing Parks and Recreation, where staffing is now back to 2010 levels, yet park use is three times higher (03:45:06–03:45:10). Closing facilities may become necessary to manage maintenance loads (03:42:46–03:42:53).
  • General Fund Dept Input:
    • Veronica (Public Health): Public Health's general fund contribution is only 6% of its budget (roughly $500,000 annually since 1998), but it is critically needed, especially given other federal funding cuts (03:55:54–03:57:11).
    • Apple Martine (Public Health): Assured the Board that Public Health is already "internalizing" the need to economize and has sent out RIF notices to see if staff will voluntarily reduce hours (03:58:34).
  • Revenue Limits: Assessor Jeff Chapman noted that state law limits property tax revenue growth to 1% plus new construction (typically 2-3%), which is significantly lower than current inflation rates/cost increases (04:00:43–04:01:31).

Public Comments

  • Veronica (Public Health): Thanked Judy Shepherd for her difficult work and stated Public Health urgently needs its modest, traditional General Fund Ask ($559,000 for 2026) due to other funding cuts (03:54:43–03:57:16).
  • Apple Martine (Public Health): Emphasized that Public Health is working collaboratively and is already exploring staffing cuts and cessations of non-critical services internally, recognizing the intensity of decisions facing other departments (03:57:41–04:00:13).
  • David Ballif (EDC Team Jefferson): Noted that the stark financial reality of the deficit underscores that "Economic growth is no longer a nice-to-have" but something the county must commit to (03:53:50).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • 2026 Recommended Budget - General Fund Workshop: Confirmed a $5.2 million deficit projection for FY2026, requiring a 12% expenditure reduction.

Financials

  • 2026 Budget Deficit: $5.2 million (Total expenditures $32M, Revenue $27M) (03:17:55).
  • Required Expenditure Reduction: 12% (03:21:51).
  • Personnel Costs: 63% of General Fund budget (03:22:12).
  • Internal Cost Increase Examples: Insurance premiums up 35% ($\sim$ $400,000 increase) (03:28:16–03:29:07).
  • Required Cash Goal: Ending Fund Balance must be positive, aiming for a post-reduction cash balance of $1.5 million going into 2027 (03:21:51–03:21:59).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Alternatives discussed primarily focus on internal cuts: voluntary furloughs/reduced hours, or laying off staff (03:33:56).
  • Alternatives outside the General Fund were discussed, such as reviewing non-departmental contracts, but many rely on separate funding sources (03:36:55–03:37:30).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Information received.
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Staff/Elected Officials]: Continue department-level internal discussions over the next two weeks to identify $3 million in cuts, aiming for a 12% reduction (03:29:50–03:30:20).
  • - [Finance Director]: Finalize the recommended budget for Public Hearing on December 1, 2025 (03:30:05).
  • - [Finance Director]: Develop a financial plan for the General Fund during Q1 2026 to stabilize the budget long-term (03:26:49–03:27:21).

Briefing: Jefferson County Food Bank Association (JCFBA)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 04:05:01–04:42:30
  • Agenda Item: Briefing from Jefferson County Food Bank Association
  • Categories: services, community support, non-profit, financial

Topic Summary

Patricia Hennessy and Lori (Board Member) from the JCFBA briefed the BOCC on their operations, the growing client demand driven by cuts to federal SNAP benefits, and the organization's recent decision to exit a multi-faceted contract structure due to financial strain, moving to leverage local facilities. The briefing was followed by public comment citing allegations against the former management and criticizing the handling of the Quilcene Food Bank facility sale.

Key Discussion Points

  • SNAP Crisis: Patricia Hennessy stated that the cutoff of SNAP benefits for 42 million Americans is "unprecedented" and a harmful "policy choice" (04:07:48). The JCFBA must anticipate a 25% increase in client load, pushing monthly need north of 4,000 people (04:21:18).
  • WIC Status: WIC benefits funding is expected to run out mid-November, necessitating JCFBA collaboration with Jefferson Healthcare to prioritize families dependent on infant formula (04:14:06–04:14:35).
  • JCFBA Operations: The organization operates 4 physical locations and a mobile pantry, relying on over 200 volunteers (04:08:34–04:09:47).
    • Food is valued at over $300,000 per month (using a WSDA metric of $2.25/lb) (04:10:43).
    • The JCFBA buys food, contracts with food bank growers (18,000 lbs grown for free this year), and rescues $\sim$ 49,000 lbs monthly (04:11:07–04:12:11).
    • 20% of East Jefferson County households are served (04:13:38).
  • SNAP Utilization: DSHS data indicates $\sim$ 1,200 households (3,400 individuals) in the JCFBA catchment area are currently utilizing SNAP (04:17:56).
  • Internal Changes: The JCFBA is actively building a new warehouse/distribution hub at the Tri-Area Food Bank property after its warehouse relationship with OleCap ended over the summer (04:08:56–04:09:08).
  • Quilcene Property: The board decided to sell the Quilcene Food Bank building despite it being half-built. The reasons were lack of parking (only 7 spaces for 100+ households weekly), cost-prohibitive completion ($\sim$ $2 million), and conditional use permit (CUP) constraints (04:33:05–04:33:55).
  • Agency Change (WSDA Contract): The JCFBA supported moving the Emergency Food Assistance Program (EFAP) contract leadership from OLICAP to the Port Angeles Food Bank. This decision was based on a strained reporting relationship with OLICAP and the realization that under OLICAP's previous biennium contract, JCFBA saw only $\sim$ $23,000 of a contract valued over $240,000 (04:31:36–04:32:34).
  • Continuity of Operations: Board Member Lori confirmed the board has a transition plan for Patricia Hennessy's departure to ensure operations and food provision continue without interruption (04:26:42–04:26:59).

Public Comments

  • [Unidentified Speaker]: Accused Patricia Hennessy and the board of disorganization, removing two managers under false pretenses, slander, and financial mismanagement (rat infestation/food spoilage) (04:36:02–04:36:37). Alleged Hennessy "hijacked" client gift cards in 2023-2024, purchasing food instead of distributing them, and failed to replace hacked cards (04:36:50–04:37:34). Disputed claims that the Quilcene building sale was necessary.
  • Dr. Steven Nader (Jefferson County Resident): Former Ag volunteer (4 years) who characterized previous management as honest and self-sacrificing (04:39:06–04:39:12). Stated audits showed no financial mismanagement by previous staff despite current board accusations (04:39:21–04:39:44). Expressed concern that the large reserve fund inherited by the current management has "evaporated" (04:40:01).
  • Osena (Nourishing Beloved Community): Expressed appreciation for the food bank's support and voiced hope that the new board will work collaboratively with other food access providers to address the current crisis (04:41:13–04:41:59).

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • The shift in WSDA contracts is expected to bring JCFBA $240,000 over 2 years (04:31:58).
  • Completing the Quilcene building was estimated to cost upwards of $2 million (04:33:46).
  • Governor Ferguson announced a $2.2 million/week stopgap measure for Washington food banks, translating to $\sim$ $26,000 a week for Jefferson County (must be reimbursed after spending) (04:20:03–04:20:41).
  • $25 will feed a family of four for a week (04:13:06).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • The JCFBA pursued moving the EFAP contract leadership to the Port Angeles Food Bank as an alternative to continuing the relationship with OLICAP (04:29:13–04:30:35).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Information received.
  • Vote: No vote taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - [BOCC]: Continue to engage with current JCFBA leadership regarding concerns and support during the transition (Implied).

Adoption of Minimum Levels of Service for Curbside Recycling Ordinance (Public Hearing)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 04:42:49–06:05:21
  • Agenda Item: Public Hearing for Curbside Recycling Minimum Service Ordinance in Unincorporated East Jefferson County
  • Categories: ordinances, infrastructure, financial, operations, environment

Topic Summary

The Board held a public hearing on and then adopted Ordinance 8.10.045, establishing Minimum Levels of Service (LOS) for single-stream curbside recycling in unincorporated East Jefferson County, effective April 1, 2026. This ordinance implements the shift from the current contaminated, publicly subsidized drop-off system to a model where customers pay directly for service (either curbside subscription or paying a fee at the disposal facilities). The core goals are to eliminate the $326,000 annual subsidy funded by garbage tipping fees and to align the county with the coming state-mandated Producer Responsibility Act (EPR). The ordinance passed 3-0.

Key Discussion Points

  • Staff Recommendation: Public Works (Al Cairns) recommended adopting the LOS ordinance, which shifts cost recovery from the garbage tipping fee (current subsidy: $\sim$ $13.89$ per ton, or $326,709$ annually) to directly charging for recycling service (04:47:32–04:48:07).
  • Drop-off Alterations: The adopted plan keeps recycling available for self-haulers at the Quilstine Drop Box and the Transfer Station, but sets a fee for service (05:23:25–05:23:37). The current plan is to move recycling containers "behind the scale" at the Transfer Station (05:17:41–05:17:47).
  • Contamination: Staff defended the use of high contamination figures (30%–61% when including garbage) in public outreach, noting that the drop-off system has long suffered high rates, despite years of education efforts (04:48:30–04:48:42, 05:35:05–05:35:14).
  • Cost Inconsistency: Staff confirmed the cost savings estimates varied between $326,000 (agenda) and $485,000, attributing it to the difficulty of real-time calculations amid the iterative process (04:49:30–04:49:55).
  • Low-Income Discount: The ordinance is noted as being the first in Washington State to include a low-income discount for recycling services at drop-off sites (05:01:42–05:02:23).
  • Recycling Reform Act (EPR): Staff argued that shifting to a unified curbside model is the best way to bridge to the 2030 state law (E2SSB 5284), which will eventually shift up to 90% of program costs to producers (04:54:21–04:55:05). Remaining an "outlier" (retaining source-separated recycling) would weaken the county's negotiating position with the Producer Responsibility Organization (04:55:05–04:55:39).
  • Curbside Cost Comparison: Comparing a single-family self-hauler (visiting twice monthly) to a comparable curbside subscriber (95-gallon cart + recycling EOW), the difference in cost is only $0.28 per month ($40 vs. $39.72), before factoring in gas and idle time (05:04:17–05:04:34).
  • Local Control: Staff disagreed with public comments asserting the ordinance is irrelevant due to WUTC authority, noting the UTC has advised staff that the adopted LOS Ordinance prevails over the WUTC tariff and is the required evidence for the hauler to submit a revised tariff (05:54:46–05:55:12).

Public Comments (Testimony)

  • Rebecca Jewell (Port Hadlock, SWAC): Fully supported the staff and the program, stating the Solid Waste Department is ethically and financially competent and has addressed a "very complicated, prickly, kind of knot of conversations" (05:26:07–05:26:13).
  • Jim Friedman (Quilcene): Opposed the fee, questioning why the county cannot maintain free drop-off recycling. Used a per-pound calculation to argue only a "penny or one 2.2 penny" (or three cent/lb) increase on the tipping fee from residents would cover the subsidy (05:29:13–05:29:42). Feared the change would divert "thousands of tons of waste" to the Transfer Station tip floor (05:27:48).
  • Caitlin Friedman (Quilcene): Raised concerns about syntactic errors in the ordinance (singular/plural use of "company") potentially limiting competitive interpretation (05:30:14–05:30:25). Requested the Commissioners "preserve free drop-off of recycling" (05:30:46).
  • Steve Colony (Cala Point Board): Stated Cala Point residents like the status quo and that the overriding goal should be "percent diversion from landfill" (05:32:02). Suggested subsidizing recycling pick-up through all solid waste fees to encourage diversion.
  • Tracy Brisman (Fort Townsend, SWAC): Highly supported staff recommendations, acknowledging that compromise is hard and noted the SWAC and staff consider the "triple bottom line" (planet, people, profit) (05:33:45).
  • Laura Tucker (Unincorporated Resident, former Public Health): Strongly supported the proposal, noting the "ridiculous amount of work" done to fight contamination. Stated at least 25% of what hits the sorting floor (MRF) ends up in a landfill, and this fact is not reported (05:35:14–05:35:36). Endorsed curbside service as a behavior-changing tool to reduce contamination (05:37:07–05:37:33).
  • Tom Tierche (Unincorporated Resident): Argued the ordinance "will ensure nothing more than what currently exists," stating the WUTC tariff preempts any local ordinance (05:39:20–05:39:47). Claimed the county is powerless to enforce the low-income discount rate or other service conditions. Also objected to the "list of customers" provision as an unacceptable "invasion of personal privacy" (05:40:52).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Public Hearing for Curbside Recycling Minimum Service Ordinance: Staff report detailing the shift in funding model, the elimination of the $326,709 subsidy, and the anticipated alignment with the state’s 2030 EPR law.

Financials

  • Current Annual Subsidy Cost: $326,709 (paid via dumping tipping fee) (04:47:40).
  • Cost Savings from Privatization: Estimated $326,000 per annum ($1.6 million over 5 years) (05:19:03).
  • HHW Grant Reallocation: Estimated $121,000 annual grant revenue for Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) starting July 1, 2027 (05:20:37).
  • Curbside Subscription (Recycling only): $12.26 per month (EOW service) (05:17:07).
  • Self-Haul Fee (Staff Recommendation): $20.00 minimum fee for combined garbage/recycling up to 220 lbs (05:17:32).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Amendment Accepted (Oral): Staff accepted the public's suggestion to remove the privacy-violating language requiring a "list of customers" and to review the single/plural inconsistencies in the use of the term "collection companies" (05:56:31–05:57:35).
  • Alternative Financial Scenarios (Presented for Discussion): Staff presented two non-recommended scenarios: A Recycling Surcharge across all transactions ($8.32/transaction) or a Hidden Fee within the per-ton tipping fee (increasing rate by $24.78 for 37% of customers) (05:20:44–05:21:45).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve the resolution adopting the 2026 solid waste ordinance establishing minimum levels of service for curbside recycling, as verbally amended by Ariel Speser (06:02:10–06:02:29).
  • Vote: Ayes (3) (06:05:11).
  • Next Steps:
  • - [PAO/Staff]: Implement the Scrivener’s corrections (privacy/syntax check) (05:57:21–05:57:35).
  • - [Public Works]: Begin the "coordinated public outreach program" campaign regarding the new fees and curbside shift (05:22:46–05:22:51).
  • - [Public Works]: Bring recommended 2026 solid waste fee schedule resolution to the board in 3-4 weeks (05:22:23–05:22:32).

Adoption of 2026-2031 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (Public Hearing)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 06:06:57–06:20:55
  • Agenda Item: Adoption of 2026-2031 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
  • Categories: infrastructure, planning, financial

Topic Summary

The Board held a public hearing to adopt the 2026-2031 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), a required planning document under state law. Public Works confirmed the projects were realistically achievable, equitably distributed, and would leverage over $46.9 million in federal and state funds. With no public testimony offered, the Board unanimously adopted the TIP.

Key Discussion Points

  • Program Scope: The TIP covers 6 years, listing 37 projects and leveraging outside funding at a high rate (Leverage is $\sim$ 2.27% Road Fund investment for grants) (06:09:02–06:10:06).
  • TIP Status: Projects are categorized as Secure (S) or Planned (P), reflecting design funding versus full construction funding (06:10:30–06:11:05).
  • TIP Philosophy: Assistant Public Works Director Eric Kuzma emphasized the TIP includes only realistic projects that the small department has a reasonable chance of completing within the 6-year timeframe, avoiding a generalized "wish list" (06:11:21–06:12:13).
  • Road Fund Investment: The TIP represents a good investment, with the road fund spending $\sim$ $177,563$ annually for this capital program (06:09:55).
  • Capacity: Eric Kuzma noted the extreme constraints of the small Public Works staff (Al and Justin for Solid Waste; Eric and Monty for transportation) to deliver multi-million dollar projects (06:16:36–06:17:30).
  • Roads Not Included (Quilcene/Quilcene Coil): Projects on Quilcene Coil or Thorndyke Road typically do not qualify for state/federal grants and are too expensive for the county to undertake alone due to low leverage (06:13:06–06:14:20). Funds from the potential Transportation Benefit District (TBD) on the ballot would be applicable to any county road (06:14:43–06:14:49).
  • Annual Review: The TIP is reviewed and amended annually, allowing for the addition of new projects (like the Big Quilcene Bridge) as funding opportunities arise (06:15:10).

Public Comments (Testimony)

  • No public comment on this topic. (06:19:15)

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Adoption of 2026-2031 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): Document detailing 37 total projects, with $\sim$ $46.9$ million in secured and planned grant funding.
  • Bridge Condition Report and Maintenance Planning (2025): Mandatory input document for the TIP, noting the Little Quilcene River Bridge is the only deficient bridge currently eligible for replacement (construction planned for 2027 or 2028 due to permitting) (Supporting Materials).

Financials

  • Total TIP Funding (2026-2031): $46,925,074 (61% Federal, 36% State, 3% Local/Other) (06:10:06).
  • Road Fund Investment (Annually): $\sim$ $177,563 (06:09:55).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve the resolution adopting the 2026-2031 six-year TIP as presented.
  • Vote: Ayes (3) (06:20:55).
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Public Works]: File the adopted TIP with the County Road Administration Board (CRAB) by December 31 (RCW 36.81.130) (Supporting Materials).
  • - [Public Works]: Continue to pursue grant funding for planned projects (e.g., Yarr Bridge) (06:12:19).

Generated On: 2025-11-07 14:08:37.144464-08:00 By: google/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 running on https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/