MEETING: Commissioners Meeting at Mon, Jul 07, 09:00 AM

County Sources

Packet Contents

AI Information

PUBLIC RECORDS MEETING SUMMARY

Procedural Matters: Audio Issues and Public Comment Call

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:00:00–00:04:18
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated
  • Categories: operations

Topic Summary

The meeting commenced with interruptions due to Zoom audio issues, which were resolved around the four-minute mark. Once operational, the Chair initiated the public comment period, welcoming in-person attendees and those joined via Zoom, specifying the methods for remote participants to offer comment.

Key Discussion Points

  • An opening observation noted that the courthouses' "Windows are opened" (00:00:16).
  • The board addressed issues with Zoom audio early in the meeting (00:01:16).
  • An online participant (Ed Bowen) was recognized as having his hand raised, but in-person comments were prioritized first (00:04:34).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken; meeting proceeded to public comment.

Public Comment: Youth Commission Collaboration (OWL360)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:04:44–00:08:29
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Relates to Item 5, Resolution Establishing Youth Commission)
  • Categories: services, planning, social services

Topic Summary

The Assistant Director of OWL360, a youth engagement organization, expressed appreciation for the proposed county Youth Commission while articulating concern over potential siloing. The commenter requested that the County prioritize partnership and collaboration with existing youth organizations, such as OWL360’s Youth and Young Adult Advisory Council (YAC), and urged further surveying of young people regarding how they wish to interface with county bureaucracy before the resolution proceeds.

Key Discussion Points

  • Jale (Assistant Director at OWL360) provided background on OWL360, noting it began in 2021 in response to youth housing needs during the pandemic, growing from one house to four, with a workforce program, a coffee house, and the core Youth and Young Adult Advisory Council (YAC) (00:05:08).
  • She noted young people are "hungry, I might even say starving, for more opportunity" (00:05:44).
  • The idea of a county Youth Commission is "really exciting" but is met with "a lot of distrust, because the community is not really designed... To include young people to the extent that it could yet" (00:06:08).
  • The YAC currently includes people aged 14 to 24 and has been exploring civic engagement, specifically forming a partnership with the Jefferson Teen Center and the Washington Youth Alliance to establish a local chapter (00:07:16).
  • Jale expressed excitement about a potential city-county connection but requested that everyone involved communicate to avoid siloing (00:07:36).
  • The final request was for "partnership and collaboration," and "more surveying young people" to understand how they want to engage with county bureaucracy before proceeding (00:08:16).
  • Commissioner Dudley-Nollette later remarked this idea was important to Mark McCauley (former County Administrator) and offered to reach out to set up a meeting with OWL360 immediately (02:21:25).

Public Comments

  • Jale (Assistant Director, OWL360): Appreciative of the proposed Youth Commission but concerned about potential siloing. Requested the County collaborate closely with existing groups like YAC and the Washington Youth Alliance, urging officials to gauge youth interest before formalizing the county commission.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Commissioner Dudley-Nollette offered to coordinate directly with OWL360 regarding the Youth Commission structure (02:22:11).
  • The item was formally pulled (01:30:40) and later approved (01:44:06) to allow for pre-commmission outreach and discussion.

Public Comment: Shoreline Management Program (SMP) Update and Geoduck Permitting

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:08:29–00:11:31
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Relates to planning/ordinances)
  • Categories: planning, land use, ordinances, permits

Topic Summary

A Port Townsend resident, and former shellfish farmer, addressed the Board concerning proposed changes to the Shoreline Management Program (SMP) update, specifically related to the permitting requirements for geoduck aquaculture. He argued that the current proposals—which require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for most changes to geoduck farms, mirroring Kitsap County's language—would create expensive and difficult permitting processes that favor large corporate operations (like Taylor Shellfish) while shutting down smaller, less-resourced local farmers, thereby damaging local food production.

Key Discussion Points

  • Gordon King raised concerns about the proposed SMP changes affecting geoduck aquaculture (00:08:44).
  • The Department of Community Development (DCD) originally proposed reasonable changes allowing conversion to geoduck farming and expansion of up to 25% without a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (00:08:59).
  • After the June 2021 Planning Commission meeting, he found that DCD inserted Kitsap County SMP agriculture language "word for word" into the Jefferson County SMP update (00:09:51).
  • The Kitsap language proposed requires a CUP for "any type of change to geoduck farms," making the process expensive and difficult (00:10:03).
  • This requirement financially benefits large companies with regulatory resources and "will shut smaller farms and less resource farmers" out of geoduck farming (00:10:16).
  • A full CUP triggers a public hearing that provides a venue for opposition (mostly waterfront property owners) to repeat "claims and misinformation" (00:10:28).
  • The applicant must pay for hearing examiners and experts to refute NIMBY claims; while Taylor Shellfish has "always prevailed," it is at the cost of "considerable resources" (00:10:45).
  • A discretionary CUP would preserve the DCD's option not to require a public hearing (00:10:54).
  • King concluded it "breaks my heart to see food protection disappearing in Jefferson County" and that increased costs harm young working families (00:11:24).
  • Commissioner Dudley-Nollette found King's statement the "most compelling... I've heard since I've been here" and stated the County does not want the SMP to keep small farmers from their jobs (02:34:05).
  • Commissioner Brotherton remarked that even an armored bulkhead is environmentally worse for the Hood Canal than a geoduck farm and agreed with King's analysis (02:40:40).

Public Comments

  • Gordon King (Port Townsend): Opposed the current SMP update proposals for geoduck aquaculture permitting. Argued that imposing full CUPs (Conditional Use Permits), based on contested Kitsap County language, creates prohibitive costs that benefit large corporations over small local farmers, contrary to the interest of local food production.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • The permitting costs associated with a full CUP force farmers to spend "considerable resources" (00:10:34).
  • The impact restricts small farmers and enhances the trend of the County being attractive only to "wealthy retirees" (00:11:24).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • King advocates for maintaining a discretionary CUP which gives DCD staff the option to waive a public hearing (00:10:54).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Commissioner Dudley-Nollette acknowledged the need for a "pretty deep conversation" with staff to better understand the SMP effects on farmers (02:34:05).
  • Commissioner Brotherton noted the timing of the SMP update is unclear but confirmed his commitment to addressing the restrictions (02:40:49).
  • Commissioner Eisenhour noted that the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office is a "pile of other things" and remains in review with the Department of Ecology (02:41:29).

Public Comment: Federal Lands Resolution, PILT Funds, and South Shore Road Closure

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:12:07–00:14:15
  • Agenda Item: Item 4 (Resolution Supporting Federal Public Lands in Jefferson County)
  • Categories: services, infrastructure, legislation

Topic Summary

An online commenter expressed lack of support for the proposed resolution regarding federal lands, criticizing the absence of data regarding the lands being considered. Furthermore, he asserted the County's focus should be on securing full Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) and Secure Rural Schools (SRS) funds. He also demanded an update on the imminent closure of South Shore Road and criticized the National Park Service for deeming the issue "not a priority," despite the impact on private property owners.

Key Discussion Points

  • Ed Bowen (West Jefferson) stated he could not support the resolution (Item 4) due to a lack of data on the federal public lands being considered (00:12:25).
  • He highlighted that the County's core focus should be pressuring for full funding of PILT and SRS (Secure Rural Schools) programs, noting they had "not passed out of the House yet" (00:12:49).
  • Bowen noted that 75% of the county is tied up in federal lands (00:12:55).
  • He demanded an update on South Shore Road, which was set to close in two days (Wednesday) and remain closed until late September (00:13:05).
  • The National Park Service stated the South Shore Road issue is "not a priority," despite the existence of private properties located up the road (00:13:23).
  • Bowen also requested an update from the 3rd District Commissioner, urging them to partner with local state legislators to host a town hall on the West End (00:14:04).
  • Commissioner Dudley-Nollette expressed support for the resolution, acknowledging the need to look at mechanisms like PILT and SRS to "get full advantage" of financing associated with federal lands (02:43:41).
  • Commissioner Brotherton agreed to pull the resolution to discuss timing and the incorporation of PILT/SRS funding issues (02:51:32, 03:22:27).

Public Comments

  • Ed Bowen (West Jefferson): Opposed the Federal Lands resolution (Item 4) due to lack of specifics. The County should instead prioritize aggressive lobbying for full PILT/SRS payments. Requested an update on the imminent and lengthy closure of South Shore Road, noting the National Park Service's negligence toward private property access.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The item relates to Item 4: Resolution Supporting Federal Public Lands in Jefferson County. The background states federal lands comprise over 75% of the county, and PILT funding is over $2 million this year.

Financials

  • Reference to a focus needed on securing the "full dollar value" for PILT and SRS funds (00:12:49).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Bowen recommended coordinating with the 3rd District Commissioner and state legislators to hold a town hall on the West End (00:14:04).
  • The Commissioners agreed to pull and revise the resolution to emphasize PILT and SRS funding (02:41:24).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • The resolution (Item 4) was pulled from the consent agenda for revision and future adoption (01:30:40).
  • Commissioner Eisenhour proposed scheduling a workshop "in the not-too-distant future" with the County Administrator (Josh Peters) and Finance Director (Stacy [Shepard]) to discuss PILT and SRS funds (03:23:03).

Public Comment: Grammar Correction on Resolution 4

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:14:35–00:15:08
  • Agenda Item: Item 4 (Resolution Supporting Federal Public Lands in Jefferson County)
  • Categories: legislation, ordinances

Topic Summary

An online participant, Tom Tierch, offered a quick note regarding the grammar of the resolution supporting federal lands, specifically suggesting rewording a sentence in Section 2, item 4.

Key Discussion Points

  • Tom Tierch focused solely on a grammatical correction for Agenda Item Number 4 (00:14:54).
  • He recommended rephrasing Section 2, sentence number 4 (00:15:04).
  • Commissioner Dudley-Nollette reviewed the text "We ask you to fully fund our public lands" (02:50:30) and later suggested the fix would be simply deleting "what we asked you to" to achieve proper parallel construction with "The purpose of this resolution is to" (03:21:45).

Public Comments

  • Tom Tierch: Recommended rewording Section 2, sentence 4 of Resolution 4 due to a grammatical error.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • The fix suggested during later discussion was to delete "what we asked you to" from the sentence in question to maintain parallel and correct grammatical construction (03:21:45).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • The resolution (Item 4) was pulled from the consent agenda for a final drafting review (01:30:40).

Public Comment: Support for Federal Lands Resolution and Opioid Settlement Funds Strategy

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:15:35–00:16:31
  • Agenda Item: Item 4 (Federal Lands Resolution) & Agenda Workshop (Opioid Settlement)
  • Categories: funding, social services

Topic Summary

A commenter expressed support for the Federal Lands Resolution and requested that the forthcoming Opioid Settlement funds be kept unified rather than "scattered in a thousand different ways." She advocated for combining the funds for an opportunity to create something meaningful in conjunction with the Health Department and the welcoming center.

Key Discussion Points

  • Julia supported the Federal Lands Resolution (Item 4) (00:15:45).
  • She expressed her intent to be present for the Opioid settlement workshop, advocating that the money "could give us a power to really create something" (00:16:03).
  • Julia requested the funds be kept together, advocating against seeing the funding "scattered in a thousand different ways" to enable the creation of "something meaningful" with the health department and welcoming center (00:16:19).
  • Commissioner Dudley-Nollette thanked Julia and noted the Opioid Settlement workshop was scheduled for 3 o'clock that afternoon, confirming the new time (02:52:02).

Public Comments

  • Julia: Supported the Federal Lands resolution. Advocated for uniting the Opioid Settlement funds to maximize impact and create a lasting benefit in coordination with the Health Department.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • The Opioid Settlement Workshop was confirmed for 3:00 PM (02:52:02).

Public Comment: Health Violations and Infections at Shelter

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:16:54–00:20:19
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Relates to public health/social services)
  • Categories: social services, public safety, public health

Topic Summary

Maggie commented on severe sanitation and infection problems at a local shelter, citing an email from a Washington State Department of Health inspector who allegedly refused to report infections. She drew a parallel to Denver, where similar issues forced the City Council to withhold $20 million from Salvation Army contracts. She alleged corruption and dangerous conditions that result in shelter residents, including an elderly woman, requiring hospitalization.

Key Discussion Points

  • Maggie cited an email from a Washington State Department of Health inspector (00:17:09).
  • She noted that the "local health department and our local hospital" refused to report infections, despite that not being required (00:17:28).
  • She recounted an elderly, disabled woman who stayed at "the shelter" for approximately one month and ended up in the hospital for almost a week with "multiple infections" (00:18:21).
  • She referenced Kyle Harris of the Dembrite, who did an investigative study on Denver shelters, noting the Denver City Council eventually withheld $20 million from the Salvation Army due to high rates of "more than casual violence, they had lots of infections, and people were dying at a higher rate" inside the shelters than on the street (00:19:03).
  • She questioned why coroners were attributing deaths to drugs rather than infections, suggesting the possibility of "insurance liability" (00:19:31).
  • Maggie stated the State Inspector was "Flippant about it" and that the indifference "denotes corruption" (00:20:00).
  • Commissioner Eisenhour wanted clarification that the cited agency was a State Department of Health person, noting the County does "not have purview over" the state agency but expressed continued interest in the issue (02:48:03).

Public Comments

  • Maggie: Alleged that the local shelter system has severe sanitation issues and high infection rates, evidenced by a disabled woman requiring hospitalization shortly after entry. She linked the local refusal to report high infection rates to corruption and official indifference, citing the precedent of Denver's City Council withholding Salvation Army funding due to similar health and safety failures.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Denver City Council was cited as having withheld $20 million from a major shelter contract due to health and safety issues (00:19:03).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Commissioner Eisenhour promised to follow up on the specific allegations regarding infectious disease control (02:48:03).
  • Commissioner Brotherton noted he was glad the County was "not in Denver" but committed to taking "actions when we can" regarding the lack of reporting (02:48:27).

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:40:40–00:41:00
  • Agenda Item: Consent Agenda Items 1, 2, 3
  • Categories: permits, infrastructure, public works

Topic Summary

The Board proceeded to approve several time-sensitive items from the Consent Agenda before moving to the pre-scheduled KPTZ community update. Specifically, three items that required immediate approval for public notice (two hearing notices and one infrastructure project closure) were pulled from the main consent agenda and approved unanimously.

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Eisenhour noted the urgency of approving Items 1 and 2 (hearing notices) and Item 3 (Public Works notice) for publication requirements (00:40:11).
  • Item 3 involves a joint project with the Port of Port Townsend to elevate a segment of a road and reconstruct the Gardiner Beach Rd. boat ramp, noting this allows the board to give some "financial support to... dig once and do both projects. Yeah, project done, yeah, that's great" (00:40:25).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Temporary Road Closure: Gardiner Beach Rd. for Boat Ramp Reconstruction: Road elevation and reconstruction of the boat ramp, a joint project with the Port of Port Townsend (00:40:25). The County is contributing $50,000 from the Road Fund.
  • Scheduling Public Hearing for Mason County PUD 1 Telecommunications Franchise Appointment (Item 2).
  • Setting Public Hearing Date for 2025 Conservation Futures Applications (Item 1).

Financials

  • The County is contributing $50,000 to the Gardiner Beach Road/Boat Ramp project from the Road Fund (00:40:25).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Approve and adopt Consent Agenda Items 1, 2, and 3.
  • Vote: Unanimous (So Moved and Seconded @ 00:40:49).
  • Next Steps: The urgent hearing notices and the road closure notice are approved for immediate promulgation.

Post-Independence Day: Fire Safety, Fireworks Ban Review, and Fire Prevention Summit

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:44:48–01:02:07
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (KPTZ Community Update)
  • Categories: public safety, operations, legislation

Topic Summary

Fire Marshal Phil Cecere and Department of Emergency Management (DEM) Director Willie Bentz provided an after-action report on the Independence Day holiday weekend following the High Fire Danger declaration and restrictions. Cecere reported successes in concentrated enforcement at Gardner Beach, but noted two fireworks-caused structure/brush fires (in Glen Cove and Doce Wallops). Discussion included analyzing data from the Quilcene RAW station, ongoing wildfire threats across the state, and planning for a community Fire Safety Summit in August.

Key Discussion Points

  • Fire Marshal Phil Cecere (00:45:05) and DEM Director Willie Bentz (01:02:06) provided a community update on the holiday weekend.
  • Concentration of Activity: Commissioner Eisenhour reported local neighbors felt there were "far fewer cars on the road" and less activity until later, noting that 10 PM to midnight saw "all the fireworks were going off" in a concentrated, albeit loud, burst of activity (00:46:38).
  • Sheriff’s Response: The Sheriff's office responded to 163 calls for service between July 3rd and 5th, including 38 firework complaints (00:48:44).
  • Enforcement Success: Cecere stated that Gardner Beach was "very quiet" for fireworks, which he considers a success in messaging. Most non-compliant visitors were from Clallam County who mistakenly thought the ban was only for Sequim (00:49:10).
  • Fireworks-Caused Fires: Cecere reported a structure fire in Glen Cove was a "direct result of fireworks" (00:50:03). A large tree near Doce Wallops also required DNR assistance to fall (00:59:33).
  • Fire Danger Analysis: Cecere relies on the Remote Automated Weather Station (RAW) in Quilcene (accessible via weather.gov) for drought/fuel moisture data, noting fuel moisture levels are dropping to "single digits" during the day (00:52:16).
  • Enforcement Strategy: Cecere is developing a "watch list" program with Chief Black (East Jefferson Fire Rescue), involving sending warning letters to repeat residential violators before moving to more serious notifications (00:55:45).
  • Human-Caused Fires: Willie Bentz noted 70% of Washington wildfires were human-caused (1990s-2020), rising to 85% in the last couple of years, including fires from fireworks, recreational fires, and parking in tall grass (01:03:00).
  • Regional Threat Outlook: Bentz stated the National Interagency Coordination Center predicts above-normal fire danger levels through the remainder of the summer, not returning to normal until October (01:04:09).
  • Drought Declaration: Bentz reported that parts of the Northern Olympics (specifically the Dungeness watershed) were included in a Department of Ecology drought declaration in early June due to rapid snowmelt (01:05:20). He predicted such drought could impact the region 40% of the time by 2050 (01:06:45).
  • All-County Preparedness Day: Willie Bentz considered the event a "tremendous success," reporting record sign-ups for neighborhood preparedness training (01:07:22).

Public Comments

  • No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The Fire Marshal’s agenda request regarding the High Fire Danger after-action. (00:45:05).
  • RCW citation: JCC8.72.040 (1) - Jefferson County Code citation (00:45:05).

Financials

  • No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Fire Safety Summit: A public Fire Prevention Summit is scheduled for Thursday, August 7th, 5-8 PM at East Jefferson Fire Rescue Station 6 in Chimicum (01:01:01). Topics will include fireworks policy review, implementation of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, and commercial fire inspections (01:01:35).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Commissioners will attend the Fire Prevention Summit in August (01:01:59). Fire Marshal Cecere will develop a residential "watch list" for repeat violators (00:55:45).

Emergency Communications Infrastructure: Ham Radio, FRS, and Field Day

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:09:30–01:15:00
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (KPTZ Community Update follow-up)
  • Categories: public safety, operations, infrastructure

Topic Summary

DEM Director Willie Bentz discussed the importance of amateur (ham) radio networks for resilient communications during emergencies, referencing the recent Field Day exercise. He contrasted ham radio, which requires a license and uses FCC frequencies and local repeaters, with simpler, license-free Family Radio System (FRS) devices, which offer only short-range, local communication. Commissioner Eisenhour announced her plan to pursue a ham radio license following the insights gained from the disaster preparedness simulation.

Key Discussion Points

  • Field Day Event: Amateur radio operators participated in the national Field Day event simultaneously with the All-County Preparedness Day (01:09:49).
  • Resilience: Amateur radio is described by Willie Bentz as the "closest thing to a... fully resilient communication source that we have" when internet, phone lines, and cell service are down (01:10:04).
  • FRS vs. Ham: Bentz explained that Family Radio System (FRS) radios are license-free, relatively cheap, and direct radio-to-radio, but are "incredibly short-range" and cannot reach the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) (01:13:34).
  • GMRS: General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS) offers a longer range but typically requires a one-time $20 household license (01:14:09).
  • Ham Radio (Amateur Radio): Relies on licenses, repeaters, and FCC radio frequencies, providing the most robust and far-reaching communication (01:14:25).
  • Commissioner Eisenhour announced she is pursuing her Ham Radio license after recognizing the importance of neighborhood communication hubs during the Preparedness Day simulation (01:14:49).
  • Bentz stated that county leadership (i.e., commissioners) being Ham licensed would significantly ease EOC communications during disasters (01:14:40).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Commissioner Eisenhour committed to obtaining a Ham Radio license to improve EOC-to-Commissioner communications during emergencies (01:14:59).

Return of Glass Recycling and IT Data Migration

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:16:10–01:19:17
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (KPTZ Community Update follow up)
  • Categories: operations, infrastructure, administration, sustainability

Topic Summary

Commissioner Eisenhour announced the imminent return of glass recycling services, which will begin with two staffed drop-off locations to minimize contamination. Separately, Sean, the IT professional, reported the successful completion of the largest data migration in the county's history as part of the "Critter Project," which involved moving 15 terabytes of data to a power-redundant facility in Hadlock to secure continuity of operations.

Key Discussion Points

  • Glass Recycling: Glass recycling services will return on July 15th (01:16:20).
  • Contamination Reduction: The County will start with two staffed drop-off locations (Transfer Station near Port Townsend and the Quilcene Dropbox) because staffed locations have "far less contamination" (01:16:42).
  • Curbside Status: Curbside pickup details are still pending an agreement with the City's hauler (01:17:05).
  • IT Migration (Critter Project): Sean (IT team) announced the completion of the "largest data migration in the history of the county," moving over 15 terabytes of data (01:17:49).
  • Continuity of Operations: This migration transfers the IT hub to the Hadlock location, which is "power redundant," securing external access to county services even during local outages (01:18:21).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Less contaminated glass yields the County "a little bit of money" (01:16:42).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Glass recycling starts July 15th at the Transfer Station and the Quilcene dropbox (01:16:58).

Rescheduling Public Hearings and Decision to Recess

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:19:26–01:20:17
  • Agenda Item: Public Hearing Rescheduling Notice
  • Categories: operations, permits, funding

Topic Summary

The Board confirmed that two public hearings scheduled for this morning were rescheduled due to an inability to access the requisite materials saved on Laserfiche resulting from the ongoing data migration. They confirmed both new dates, noted the absence of time-sensitive items, and agreed to recess the meeting until 10:30 AM before continuing with the Consent Agenda review and other business.

Key Discussion Points

  • The public hearings for Conservation Futures Funding and the Mason County PUD No. 1 telecommunications franchise were rescheduled to July 21st (01:19:59).
  • The necessity for rescheduling was attributed to the IT migration rendering the necessary file path inaccessible on Laserfiche (01:19:51).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The agenda listed the Public Hearing Rescheduling Notice.
  • Conservation Futures Funding Applications for 2025 Hearing: New Date: July 21, 2025 (2:30 p.m.).
  • Mason County PUD No. 1 Telecommunications Franchise Hearing: New Date: July 21, 2025 (11:00 a.m.).

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Recess until 10:30 AM (01:20:14).
  • Next Steps: Continue with briefing and calendaring at 10:30 AM.

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:20:35–0:44:06
  • Agenda Item: Item 4 (Federal Lands Resolution), Item 5 (Youth Commission Resolution), Consent Agenda Items 6-19
  • Categories: legislation, funding, environment, social services

Topic Summary

Following the recess, the Board continued the discussion on the pulled resolutions. For the Federal Lands Resolution (Item 4), the Board agreed to delay action, incorporate the suggestion for grammatical correction, and broaden the resolution's scope to address PILT/SRS funding and resource issues suggested by the Mountaineer Coalition. The Youth Commission Resolution (Item 5) was discussed in light of public comments concerning potential duplication/siloing. The Board determined the language was broad enough to allow for partnership with existing groups like OWL360's YAC, enabling a flexible approach to its final establishment. All remaining Consent Agenda items (6-19) were approved unanimously.

Key Discussion Points

  • Federal Lands Resolution (Item 4): The urgency of the original resolution had lessened (02:08:58). The Board agreed to revise the resolution to address PILT and SRS funding (02:08:29) and incorporate the suggested grammatical correction (03:21:45). Commissioner Eisenhour agreed to revise and bring it back next week (01:30:54).
  • Youth Commission Resolution (Item 5): Discussion focused on overcoming potential conflicts with existing groups like OWL360's YAC (01:41:44).
    • Concern: Establishing a county commission would necessitate Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) compliance, potentially formalizing the structure beyond the current youth councils (01:44:19).
    • Resolution: Commissioner Brotherton suggested passing the resolution now to provide a foundation, while proactively engaging youth groups to co-develop the "establishing documents" later (01:41:59). The eventual commission might become a formal mechanism for existing groups to interface with the County/City governments (01:42:05).
  • Federal Lands Data: Commissioner Eisenhour highlighted two striking data points when discussing the need for a deeper review of federal land resources: 75% of County lands are federal, and close to 29% of the County population is on Medicaid (01:27:26), underscoring the interconnected fiscal fragility.
  • Mental Health Services (Item 17): Commissioner Eisenhour highlighted the reallocation within the OESD psychological services contract from clinical supervision to professional development (PD). She affirmed this goal is important for ensuring staff is "fully trained and has all the tools that they need for appropriate respite" (00:44:21).

Public Comments

  • Anonymous chat comment inquired if the Youth Commission's acronym "YAC" related to the Senior Center (01:25:23).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Resolution Establishing a Jefferson County Youth Commission (Item 5): This was approved based on the premise it was "broad" enough to allow subsequent partnership development (01:41:44).
  • Amendment No. 3: Reallocation of OESD Mental Health Funds (Item 17): Reallocates $1,200 to professional development for therapists serving K-12 youth (00:43:31).

Financials

  • Total contract amount for OESD school-based services: $191,260.00 (00:43:40 - supporting material).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Item 4: Postponed for redrafting to include advocacy for PILT and SRS funding mechanisms ($2+ Million/yr Federal Funding).
  • Item 5: The suggested amendment to add a "whereas" clause about partnership was deemed sufficiently covered under the Section 4 "Inclusive participation" clause (01:32:02).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision (Items 6-19): Approved remaining agenda by consent.
  • Vote (Items 6-19): Unanimous, pending the pulling of Items 4 and 5 (01:30:46).
  • Decision (Item 5): Resolution Establishing a Jefferson County Youth Commission was Moved, Seconded, and Approved as presented (01:44:06).
  • Next Steps (Item 5): Commissioner Dudley-Nollette will initiate discussions to co-develop the commission's governing documents with youth-focused organizations like OWL360's YAC (01:41:59).

Briefing and Calendaring: Community Outreach Meetings and Road/Bridge Projects

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:45:00–02:24:21
  • Agenda Item: Briefing and Calendaring
  • Categories: operations, infrastructure, tourism, planning

Topic Summary

Commissioners briefed on the previous two weeks of work outside the legislative session, focusing particularly on ongoing regional construction and the need to overhaul the format of county community outreach meetings. Significant updates were provided on the Quilcene Bridge project, the RFP process for the Port Townsend roundabout signage, and discussions within the Tourism Coordinating Council (TCC) regarding funding for the Port Townsend pool site analysis. The necessity for a new format for the all-county meetings was repeatedly emphasized, with ideas ranging from thematic, neighborhood-specific events (e.g., focused on the Hadlock sewer project) to incorporating dinner and interactive online survey tools like Mentimeter.

Key Discussion Points

  • Community Outreach Meetings: The need to overhaul the format of these meetings was a running theme. Attendance at the Port Ludlow meeting was poor, reinforcing the need for a stronger theme beyond "us talking at people" (02:03:41).
    • Suggestions for New Format: Ideas included coupling the meetings with free dinner (02:07:26); scheduling them earlier in the evening (closer to 4:30 PM, 02:02:44), making them thematic (e.g., "What's Happening in Your Neighborhood" or focus on the Hadlock sewer/UGA status, 02:12:00); and using interactive technologies like Mentimeter for on-the-fly digital polling (02:16:10).
  • Quilcene Bridge Project: Commissioner Brotherton reported touring the project site, noting the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe is a key partner (01:57:01). The "last of 24 50-foot-deep holes" were being dug for the 6-foot concrete foundations (01:57:29).
  • Roundabout Signage RFP: The RFP process for the signage at the Port Townsend bridge roundabout went well, receiving 3 presentations (01:46:58). The preferred alternative is in negotiation regarding lighting, and the applicants were flexible on incorporating Salish tribal design elements (01:48:05).
  • Tourism Coordinating Council (TCC) and Pool Study: TCC discussed the $20,000 LTAC award designated for a market study of the potential new pool (01:48:48). The debate regarded whether to fund a site analysis/traffic study first, owing to concerns that the site near the library lacked sufficient parking and overflow capacity for large events (01:51:21). TCC passed a motion allowing the use of LTAC funds for the site analysis/traffic study, which the Prosecutor's Office confirmed was a legal use (01:51:30).
  • Tribal Relations (Ho Days): Commissioner Brotherton attended Ho Days, where the tribe shared plans for a new Resilience Center complex, which is funded and scheduled for completion by 2026 (02:21:46). The plan includes a convenience store, cannabis store, 41 residential units, and an apartment building built along 101 (02:22:25).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The $20,000 LTAC award for the Port Townsed pool study (01:48:48).
  • The EDC Board meeting passed a budget following a Commerce grant reduction from $82,000 to $62,000 (01:59:43).
  • Juvenile Services is holding a "Lunch and Learn" update meeting on Tuesday (03:32:50).

Financials

  • EDC budget faced a reduction of $20,000 on a Commerce grant (from $82,000 down to $62,000) (01:59:43).
  • $20,000 LTAC award funding the pool market/site study (01:48:48).
  • The complexity of managing federal land funds (PILT/SRS) was noted (02:12:30).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Discussion centered on the alternative format for Community Outreach Meetings (thematic topics, dinner, interactive surveys).
  • The TCC implicitly authorized a revised scope for the LTAC Pool Award to cover a technical traffic/site analysis given the known parking issues at the preferred site (01:51:30).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Commissioner Eisenhour committed to email the LTAC members about the TCC funding decision for the pool study to ensure collaboration (01:56:37). The Board will discuss the scheduling and format of the next Community Outreach Meeting in Hadlock (July 24th) with themes specific to the local sewer/UGA projects (02:21:00).

Briefing: Behavioral Health, Forestry, and Technology

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:24:35–03:10:00
  • Agenda Item: Briefing and Calendaring
  • Categories: public health, environment, funding, operations

Topic Summary

Commissioner Eisenhour provided updates on significant work items, including a detailed review of the county’s recycling and forestry program efforts. She reported the return of glass recycling is enabled by a global corporate acquisition that can now ship glass by rail. In forestry, she reported on the Washington DNR Carbon and Forest Management Work Group, which concluded without a clear consensus on management scenarios for carbon sequestration and financial return. Briefing items also included an update on the complexity of the 10-year Homeless and Housing Plan process, and the value of a successful visit to Clallam County's public health-run "Harm Reduction Health Center," which uses opioid funds.

Key Discussion Points

  • Glass Recycling Return: The return of glass recycling was enabled by the purchase of Strategic Materials (SMI) by a multinational firm, Sebelco, which will now ship glass to Oregon markets by rail (02:27:28).
    • JCPH will seek official agreement on July 21st for the privatization of recycling services starting in 2026 (02:27:52).
  • DNR Carbon & Forest Management Work Group: The work group concluded its 15-month effort (02:37:06). The scientific modeling of 7 scenarios (e.g., longer rotations, increased thinning) did not yield a clear consensus on a single best path to both sequester more carbon and ensure revenue for beneficiaries (02:39:06). The results were viewed as informative but did not provide a definitive pathway (02:39:06).
  • Sustainable Forestry & Private Landowners: Eisenhour discussed exploring options for partnering with private landowners who own small (5-15 acre) parcels for fire-thinning and timber harvesting, leveraging the expertise of County Forester Mallory Weinheimer and potentially integrating these efforts with East Jefferson Fire Rescue’s Firewise program (02:35:10).
  • DNR Trust Land Transfer (TLT): Discussion noted the county is pursuing four TLT applications to reacquire state forest lands, which rank well but must be resubmitted after tribal access to the program in the last funding round (02:30:14).
  • Homeless/Housing Plan: The complexity and requirements of the 5-year Homeless and Housing Plan process were noted, expressing "even more gratitude for Vicki Sontag" and Audrey Markford for volunteering to lead the county's effort (02:58:39).
  • Harm Reduction Center Visit: Eisenhour toured Clallam County's Public Health Harm Reduction Health Center and Urban Rest Stop, noting Clallam County chose to funnel all of its Opioid Settlement funds to "establish and run" the facility (04:47:24). It offers syringe exchange, wound care, food, and aims to add laundry services (04:48:00).
  • New Recreation: Eisenhour attended the Fort Warden Jump Park opening, noting the "incredible energy" and the new Octopus Gate by Gunther that plays on the beluga design (02:40:03).
  • Production Alliance: Eisenhour stressed the need to keep the Production Alliance thriving, noting it is essential for event management and community engagement (02:42:34).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The Juvenile Services Family Preservation Services PSA (03:32:01).
  • The discussion relates to the Opioid Settlement Funds Management and Workshop Proposal.

Financials

  • The need to secure long-term funding for the Production Alliance was discussed (02:42:48).
  • Concerns about the vulnerability of local services to federal funding cuts, especially regarding healthcare and the Medicaid work requirement, were reviewed (04:40:55, 04:40:00).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Commissioners agreed to discuss funding the Behavioral Health Coordinator position through the upcoming budget process (05:24:29).

Briefing: Administrator's First Week and Impending Budget Decisions (Road Fund)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:11:12–03:18:09
  • Agenda Item: Briefing/County Administrator's Report
  • Categories: administration, contracts, budgets, infrastructure

Topic Summary

In his first official week as County Administrator, Josh Peters briefed the board on internal changes and impending critical budget issues. He noted a higher level of in-person activity in the courthouse basement and streamlined staff meetings to a monthly, rotating in-person format. Critically, he confirmed he had met with Public Works regarding the Road Fund and is preparing the Board for a workshop on July 14th to address urgent, antecedent budget issues that must be resolved before the main budget process begins.

Key Discussion Points

  • Public Defense Caseload Standards: Peters addressed the state Supreme Court decision on public defense caseloads, noting the expiring contract with Jefferson Associated Counsel (Richard Davies). He suggested an extension might be necessary until the legislature addresses the decision and its significant budget implications (03:12:43).
  • Senior Management Team Meetings: Peters transitioned department director meetings from bi-weekly virtual check-ins to a monthly in-person rotating meeting (03:15:38). The goal is to foster better in-person collaboration among senior managers (03:15:55).
  • DCD Support: Principal Planner Monchi Lindblad was asked to step in to review planning issues (03:16:53).
  • Road Fund and Budget: Peters spoke with the Public Works Director about the Road Fund and is preparing the Board for an urgent workshop on July 14th to make preliminary budget decisions "antecedents to the rest of the budget process" (03:17:51).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Road Fund budget issues were identified as an urgent discussion point for the upcoming July 14th workshop (03:17:26).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Budget workshop scheduled for July 14th to address Road Fund and other antecedent budgeting issues (03:17:51). Peters will work on the Public Defense contract issue (03:12:43).

Discussion: Opioid Settlement Funds Workshop and Public Defense Costs

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:22:43–03:31:27
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Briefing/Discussion)
  • Categories: funding, legislation, public safety

Topic Summary

The brief discussion centered on the extreme potential costs associated with the state Supreme Court’s decision on minimum public defense caseload standards, which could increase compensation demands for public defenders. Commissioners also reviewed key findings from the NACO legislative update regarding federal budget cuts (Medicaid/SNAP), which are projected to shift billions in uncompensated healthcare and administrative burdens onto county governments, underscoring the urgency of managing the opioid settlement funds effectively.

Key Discussion Points

  • Public Defense Cost Increase: Commissioner Eisenhour predicted the public defense standards change could lead to a "bidding war" for the scarce attorneys, potentially tripling existing costs (03:22:21). The new rule was predicated on a study that Commissioner Eisenhour does not take seriously (03:23:41). James noted that the required number of attorneys "don't exist" (03:22:03).
  • Federal Budget Cuts (NACO Update): The federal reconciliation package is expected to cause major long-term cost shifts to counties (03:25:33).
    • Medicaid: Projected $18.9 billion increase in uncompensated healthcare costs by 2026, with an estimated 17 million people losing coverage (03:25:47). This impacts critical access hospitals (03:25:52).
    • County Burden: The administrative burden will increase due to eligibility determination workloads and the need to administer grants (03:26:30).
  • NACO Funds/Resolution: Eisenhour highlighted that federal renewable energy revenue sharing will direct 25% of wind and solar revenue from federal lands directly to counties (03:29:20), which she found interesting given the simultaneous push to sell off public lands (03:29:28).
  • Rural Health Funds: A $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program is being funded for Critical Access Hospitals to apply for grants (03:27:58).

Public Comments

  • No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • NACO legislative update slides (03:26:54).

Financials

  • Projected $18.9 billion increase in uncompensated healthcare costs by 2026 (03:25:47).
  • 25% of federal wind and solar revenue will go directly to counties (03:29:20).
  • 28.7% of Jefferson County residents are on Medicaid (03:28:55).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Commissioner Eisenhour will send around the NACO presentation slides (03:31:27).

Calendaring: Upcoming Meetings and Next Steps

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:31:32–03:42:07
  • Agenda Item: Calendaring
  • Categories: administration, social services, permits, infrastructure

Topic Summary

Commissioners quickly finalized their calendars for the coming week, noting several mandatory and advisory meetings. Key activities include an FAA meeting, a meeting regarding an artist's proposal, and updates on the highly competitive bid process for the Port Townsend Daycare Center construction. The Board also set the intention to physically rearrange the chambers to facilitate a "workshop" format for the subsequent Opioid Settlement discussion.

Key Discussion Points

  • Housing Fund Board Follow-ups: Eisenhour noted the need to follow up on the Hugging Tree Legacy contract (03:32:04).
  • Art Proposal Review: Eisenhour and Peters scheduled a meeting to review the proposal by artist Alexandra Amnag Nostopoulos (03:33:14).
  • Daycare Center Construction: The Port Townsend/Jefferson County Early Learning and Family Support Center construction bids are coming in, and the process is described as "a little bit nail-biting" amid rising costs (03:34:47).
  • Short-Term Rental Ordinance Follow-up: Eisenhour is meeting with an individual who was "very, very upset" about the recently passed short-term rental ordinance but who also has brilliant, outside-the-box housing proposal ideas (03:35:34).
  • Website Update: Sean (IT) is pulling department heads together to review the "agenda Center idea" within CivicPlus, which aims to make accessing meeting minutes and documents easier (03:36:50).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Workshop Format: Commissioners agreed to physically rearrange the hearing room for the Opioid Settlement Workshop to facilitate a collaborative format rather than the standard public meeting structure (03:38:03).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Recess until 3:00 PM for the rescheduled Opioid Settlement Funds Workshop (03:40:40).

Workshop: Opioid Settlement Funds Management (Presentation)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:42:14–04:47:06
  • Agenda Item: Workshop: Opioid Settlement Funds Management
  • Categories: funding, social services, public health, contracts

Topic Summary

Commissioner Eisenhour led a workshop to review the complex administration of the Opioid Settlement Funds, aiming to decide on the use of the latest Manufacturer funds and the continuation of the Behavioral Health Consortium (BHC). She presented a detailed breakdown of the three funding strands (Pharmaceutical, Distributor, Manufacturer), noting the total receipts were $690,969.78 to date. Key concerns included the unpredictability of future payouts over the 17-year projected term, the potential administrative burden of managing separated funds, and avoiding the trap of using opioid abatement funds to plug unrelated General Fund holes.

Key Discussion Points

  • Funding Structure: Funds are split into three categories from settlements: Pharmaceutical, Distributor, and Manufacturer (03:47:17).
    • Pharmaceutical Funds (BHAC/RFP): $506,776.68 received to date, designated for community programs via an RFP (Request for Proposal) process planned for Fall 2025 (04:03:17).
    • Distributor Funds (BHC/DBH): $149,007.56 received, designated for the Behavioral Health Consortium (BHC) administration, administered at no administrative fee by Discovery Behavioral Health Care (DBH) (04:07:07).
    • Manufacturer Funds (Undesignated): $35,185.54 received so far (03:48:25).
  • Financial Unpredictability: The timeline and amounts are unpredictable, with payments projected over up to 17 years (04:00:05). This volatility poses a crisis for funding, training, and retaining capacity (04:02:05).
  • Oversight and Accountability: Eisenhour warned of active national watchdog organizations (e.g., Christine Minhue, an attorney in Seattle) ensuring local governments do not exploit the funds to "fill the gaps" or subsidize the General Fund (04:23:41).
  • MOU Abatement Strategies: The funds must abide by the "One Washington MOU," with uses targeting three areas: Treatment, Prevention, and Other Strategies (04:15:12).
  • Community Priorities: A special meeting identified the three highest-need areas for opioid abatement funding: Access to Care/Coordination, Transportation, and Housing (04:19:29).
  • Day Center / Urban Rest Stop: This concept for coordinated access was discussed as a model (04:32:36). Eisenhour noted Clallam County used all its Opioid Settlement funds to establish a public health-run Harm Reduction Health Center/day center (04:47:24).
  • Existing Program Vulnerability: Discussion centered on the Jail Medical Program ($360,000 annual budget, 04:27:04) and Mental Health Navigator Program, noting they face future budget shortfalls and are only partially eligible for opioid funds to the extent they serve OUD/SUD populations (04:28:04).

Public Comments

  • No comments were taken during this phase of the workshop.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Breakdown of Pharmaceutical, Distributor, and Manufacturer funds received (03:49:31).
  • One Washington MOU abatement strategies summary (04:15:12).
  • Summary of the BHAC Stakeholder Workshop community priorities (04:17:00).
  • Previous fund allocation decisions (e.g., Distributor funds to BHC/DBH) (04:07:07).

Financials

  • Total received: $690,969.78.
  • Distributor funds received: $149,007.56. Spent $119,130.49; balance remaining: $29,877.07 (03:53:05).
  • Pharmaceutical funds received (RFP Pot): $506,776.68 (04:03:17).
  • Manufacturer funds received: $35,185.54 (03:48:25).
  • Director Martine noted the Jail Medical Program budget is around $360,000 this year (04:27:04).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Coordination/Consolidation: Discussion on creating a dedicated Opioid Settlement Fund (rather than a subaccount in Fund 131) to maintain transparency and fund security, particularly the investment of the half-million dollars accrued for the RFP process (04:53:02).
  • Direct Appropriation: A proposal to use funds for Direct Appropriations to keep high-impact programs (like Drug Court, Jail Medical) alive, rather than forcing them to compete via RFP (04:30:42).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Next Steps: Commissioners agreed to discuss (04:41:40).

Workshop: Opioid Settlement Funds Management (Next Steps and Priority)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 04:47:06–05:25:05
  • Agenda Item: Workshop: Opioid Settlement Funds Management (Continued)
  • Categories: funding, social services, public health, contracts

Topic Summary

The workshop concluded with a final discussion on immediate next steps. The Board coalesced around the high priority of funding a full-time Behavioral Health Coordinator within Public Health using the Opioid Settlement’s administrative allowance to secure the capacity needed to manage the 17-year funding stream and expedite disbursement. The Board also decided to bundle the unpredictable Manufacturer funds ($35k+) with the Pharmaceutical funds for the planned RFP and requested the Behavioral Health Consortium (BHC) submit a final plan on its future by November 3rd.

Key Discussion Points

  • Funding Stability and RFP: The uninvested $506,776.68 in Pharmaceutical funds presents an immediate opportunity for investment in the County's LGIP to accumulate interest while waiting for the RFP process (04:51:56).
  • Dedicated Fund Creation: The Board agreed to formalize a separate, dedicated Opioid Settlement Fund (rather than a Fund 131 subaccount) for maximum transparency and accountability, especially given the multi-year duration (04:53:02).
  • Consolidation: The Board concurred that the relatively small, unpredictable Manufacturer funds ($35k+) should be consolidated with the larger Pharmaceutical funds to create "one pot of money" for the RFP process (05:06:44).
  • Behavioral Health Coordinator (Staffing): Public Health Director Apple Martine stressed the urgent need for a new, full-time FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) Behavioral Health Coordinator to manage the work, arguing that effective administration is the only way for the money to get "on the street in an effective way" (05:00:35). The position would be funded by the administrative allowance from the Opioid Settlement funds (05:00:10).
  • BHC Continuation: The BHC survey showed a majority supports continuing the consortium (76.5% total, 05:03:12). The BOCC granted the BHC until November 3rd to decide on its future mission and administrative needs (05:04:29).
  • Prioritizing Existing Programs (Public Comment): Dr. Gabby Caudel strongly advocated against funding new programs (like the urban rest stop) and insisted the RFP process must prioritize "existing, proven programs" with data, specifically citing the Jail's MOUD program and the LEAD programs (05:08:24). She noted the Jail MOUD program recently secured $300,000 in grant funding (05:08:47).

Public Comments

  • Dr. Gabby Caudel: Stated she supports prioritizing and strengthening existing programs through a fair RFP process, arguing that creating new, "untested initiatives" diverts resources from proven models like the Jail's MOUD program (05:08:24). She advised making "smart, effective, and sustainable" use of limited funds due to the coming crisis of federal/state spending cuts (05:08:02).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • BHC member survey results (05:03:12).
  • Financial data on the three funding strands (04:51:10).

Financials

  • Pharmaceutical and Manufacturer funds are currently uninvested (04:51:47).
  • Funding the new FTE Behavioral Health Coordinator will be a priority budget discussion, utilizing opioid administration funds (05:24:29).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • RFP Delay: Concerns were raised about whether to delay the RFP until Spring 2026 to better assess the impact of federal/state budget cuts (which begin in 2026/2027) on existing programs (05:15:32). The Board agreed they could manage this risk by only allocating a portion of the funds (e.g., $300,000) this fall, delaying full allocation decisions (05:22:35).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision (Fund Creation): Staff directed to create a separate Opioid Settlement Fund under the authority of Public Health and request the Treasurer to invest the balance in LGIP (05:02:15, 05:24:46).
  • Decision (BHC Plan): The BHC is granted until November 3rd to deliver a recommendation on its future and use of Distributor funds (05:02:41, 05:12:14).
  • Decision (Fund Consolidation): Manufacturer funds will be integrated with Pharmaceutical funds (05:22:15).
  • Next Steps: Budget discussions will prioritize funding the FTE Behavioral Health Coordinator for Public Health to administer the total fund portfolio (05:24:29).

Generated On: 2025-11-07 14:06:42.121334-08:00 By: google/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 running on https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/