MEETING: Commissioners Meeting at Mon, Mar 24, 09:00 AM

County Sources

Packet Contents

AI Information

JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING SUMMARY

MEETING DATE: March 24, 2025

Public Comments on Property Issues (Peninsula Auto Wrecking)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:01:19.000–00:06:01.000
  • Agenda Item: Public Comments
  • Categories: land use, public safety, environment, ordinances

Topic Summary

Two residents of Black Bear Road, Peggy (no last name provided) and Cindy Kobadish, requested the Board's help regarding non-compliant and unsafe conditions at a neighboring property, Peninsula Auto Wrecking. They requested a full county inspection, a written notice of violations with a clear compliance timeline, and ongoing monitoring. Primary concerns included safety risks from exposed hazards (glass, oil, gasoline) for neighborhood children, nighttime theft activity, public safety due to equipment obstructing the narrow road, and the site being an eyesore. A simple request to enforce an eight-foot opaque fence provision was suggested as a means of immediate, partial remediation.

Key Discussion Points

  • Peggy requested a full county inspection of the listed property, a written notice of violations, and a clear timeline for compliance (00:01:58).
  • The property is not only an eyesore but also a safety concern due to hazards like glass, leaking oil, and gasoline (00:02:30).
  • Peggy requested enforcement of an eight-foot opaque fence as stated in ordinances (00:02:44).
  • Nighttime activity includes people stealing from the cars, making the neighborhood feel unsafe (00:03:03).
  • Equipment parked on the side of the narrow road (Black Bear Road) makes it almost impossible for fire trucks or ambulances to get through (00:03:29).
  • Cindy Kobadish, a direct neighbor, reiterated concerns about the wrecking yard being so full of material and big trucks parking on the edge of the road, posing a very big risk to fire apparatus ingress/egress (00:05:17).

Public Comments

  • Peggy (Black Bear Road Resident): Requested enforcement of ordinances, specifically for an eight-foot opaque fence, due to safety concerns (glass, fluid leaks) and road obstruction from parked equipment.
  • Cindy Kobadish (Neighbor behind wrecking yard): Expressed concern that trucks parking on the road edge obstruct traffic and make it impossible for large vehicles like fire trucks to pass.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • A simple solution: enforce an eight-foot opaque fence (00:02:44).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; item was part of public comment.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - Commissioner Brotherton: Will send Peggy a link to the Jefferson County complaint form to formally initiate a code compliance process regarding the wrecking facility, which has a valid permit but may be violating conditions (00:18:13).
  • - Commissioner Eisenhour: Encouraged Peggy/Cindy to submit a formal complaint through the county's system; noted that Environmental Public Health has already reached out to the wrecking yard (00:23:57).
  • - Commissioner Brotherton/Eisenhour: Will workshop responsibility for bird dogging the case with the Public Works team to address the cars in the right-of-way impacting ingress/egress for elderly residents (00:31:17).

Public Comments on Illegal Short-Term Rentals (STRs) and West End Issues

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:08:48.000–00:14:14.000
  • Agenda Item: Public Comments
  • Categories: land use, ordinances, infrastructure, public safety

Topic Summary

Kathy Hart commented via Zoom regarding illegal Airbnbs, specifically "The Ho House" on the West End of Jefferson County, operating in violation of the moratorium placed in April 2024. She expressed frustration over disruption, perceived risks to her dogs and personal safety, and a perceived disregard for county regulations, citing a staff member's disappointing explanation of traffic counts. Ed Bowen raised ongoing concerns about clarity regarding the Governor's emergency declaration for roads, particularly South Shore Road, asking the Commissioners to figure out communication strategy and noting conflicting dates or missing information in the public declaration.

Key Discussion Points

  • Kathy Hart found an Airbnb ("The Ho House") operating on their five-acre parcel on Cougar Glen Lane, noting the county placed a moratorium on new Airbnb permits in April 2024 (00:09:45).
  • Hart stated the illegal operation causes constant stress, excessive traffic (up to four times a day), and safety concerns, forcing her to kennel her dogs (00:10:17).
  • Ed Bowen (West Jefferson) asked Commissioners to clarify the Governor's emergency declaration regarding South Shore Road, noting the public declaration does not explicitly discuss roads and has conflicting dates (00:12:33).
  • Bowen questioned the science or details provided by the park service on the North Shore Road closure (July 7th), clarifying it is related to a 2021 disaster repair, not a bridge concern (00:13:05).
  • Bowen asked who is responsible for public engagement on the South Shore Road issue (County or National Park Service) and where residents should tune in for efficient updates (00:13:33).
  • Commissioner Brotherton clarified to Hart that the moratorium was primarily for licensing new STRs in case regulations changed, not to immediately shut down all currently operating STRs without a permit (00:19:52).
  • Brotherton suggested Hart use the complaint form, but noted that sending 288 emails in a weekend was a way to lose his attention (00:20:13–00:20:36).
  • Commissioner Eisenhour acknowledged Hart needing to vent and promised follow-through, noting the county is working toward setting the best policy for STR permitting (00:26:41).

Public Comments

  • Kathy Hart (online): Complained about an illegal Airbnb ("The Ho House") operating despite the county moratorium, causing excessive traffic, safety concerns, and staff disrespect.
  • Ed Bowen (online): Requested clarification on the Governor's emergency declaration regarding South Shore Road, raised questions about the North Shore Road closure, and requested the Board define a clear strategy for public engagement on West End road issues.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Hart requested the county shut down "The Ho House" immediately, as they had no notice it was opening next to their property (00:11:47).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; informational.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - Commissioner Brotherton/Eisenhour: Will continue seeking clarification regarding the emergency declaration and communication strategy for West End road issues (00:19:06).
  • - DCD Staff (Implicit): The formal STR complaint process remains open to address the illegal Airbnb mentioned, as noted by Commissioner Brotherton (00:20:13).
  • - BoCC/Public Works (Follow-up): Commissioner Eisenhour requested a written report or workshop from Public Works on the status of West End roads, including Upper Hoe Road (permit bids), South Shore Quinault Road (FHWA ER funds), and Oil City Road (new landslide/washout) (00:34:00).

Public Comments on Environmental Cleanup and Homelessness Advocacy

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:06:13.000–00:08:01.000; 00:14:15.000–00:16:18.000
  • Agenda Item: Public Comments
  • Categories: services, environment, public safety, public safety

Topic Summary

Maggie (no last name provided) advocated for an ADA accessible urban rest stop for homeless and low-income residents, emphasizing equity and broad community benefit. Jean Bob reported on a successful trash cleanup effort by the Jefferson County Trash Task Force on Anderson Lake Road, where Public Works and the Sheriff’s Department (Deputy Heck) provided valuable support via LED reader boards and speed enforcement. Bob also highlighted a disturbing discovery of five-gallon buckets of paint and leaky paint thinner placed upside down in a wetland.

Key Discussion Points

  • Maggie emphasized the importance of an ADA accessible urban rest stop to meet the essential life needs of homeless and low-income residents, advocating for a model using resources across agencies and foundations to ensure financial efficiency (00:06:36).
  • Jean Bob reported the Jefferson County Trash Task Force cleanup was a "win" with support from Public Works (LED reader boards) and the Sheriff's Department (Deputy Heck) providing speed enforcement (00:15:21).
  • Bob reported finding six jugs/buckets full of paint and paint thinner, with two leaky five-gallon jugs placed upside down in a wetland area (00:15:04).
  • Commissioner Brotherton thanked Jean Bob, noting the task force demonstrates effectiveness when public, private, and nonprofit legs of service come together (00:21:47).
  • Commissioner Eisenhour thanked Bob for the positive criticism, expressing gratitude for the shout-out to hardworking staff in Public Works and the Sheriff's Office (00:27:39).
  • Commissioner Eisenhour asked Jean Bob to follow up on whether the Trash Task Force volunteers receive training on how to handle toxic waste encountered during cleanups (00:37:37).

Public Comments

  • Maggie: Advocated for a collaborative, financially efficient, and ADA-accessible urban rest stop for homeless and low-income community members.
  • Jean Bob: Commended Public Works and the Sheriff's Department for their support during the Anderson Lake Road cleanup, but expressed dismay over the discovery of hazardous waste dumped in a wetland.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; informational.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - Commissioner Eisenhour: Will personally support Maggie’s advocacy efforts for the urban rest stop until a clearer path for direct county engagement opens (00:25:49).
  • - Jean Bob (Requested): Follow-up regarding volunteer training for handling toxic waste (00:37:37).

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:38:39.000–00:47:40.000
  • Agenda Item: Consent Agenda
  • Categories: planning, budgeting, services, contracts, infrastructure, personnel

Topic Summary

The Board discussed and unanimously approved the Consent Agenda. Key items highlighted by Commissioners included changing the Public Facilities District (PFD) Creation Hearing to a later date (April 14th) for better public and stakeholder preparation, celebrating the acceptance of a major state Connecting Housing to Infrastructure Program (CHIP) Grant (totaling \$776,139), and noting the successful renewal of the labor relations contract with Robert Braun, which provides essential support to the HR team. Commissioners also praised the progress on the Rhody Drive Pedestrian-Bike Improvements project and the extension of the Winter Welcoming Center contract.

Key Discussion Points

  • The public hearing notice for the PFD Creation (Item 1) was moved from April 7th to April 14th at 2:30 p.m. to allow the Jefferson Aquatic Coalition and the public more time to process analysis and prepare (00:39:06).
  • The CHIP Grant acceptance for infrastructure was exciting, noting it covers infrastructure costs and reimburses the county for time involved (00:41:48). The grant term is unusual but the County expects to commit to the money by the June 30th deadline (00:41:14).
  • The USDA Right-of-Way Certificate signals a great partnership with the City of Port Townsend for the Early Learning and Family Support Center project next to Port Townsend High School (00:42:34).
  • The Winter Welcoming Center contract continues to provide critical cold snap support via Fund #127 after state funds were lost elsewhere (00:45:35).
  • The continuation of the agreement with Bob Braun for labor relations support (up to \$100,000 over three years) allows the internal HR team to level up and manage collective bargaining with legal support (00:43:44).
  • Progress on the Rhody Drive Pedestrian-Bike Improvements project was noted, which will bring exciting mobility improvements to Chimacum (00:46:17).
  • Consent Agenda Decisions (Context from Packet Materials):
    • SR 19 Rhody Dr. Ped-Bike Improvements (SCJ Alliance): Approved Professional Services Agreement for \$401,274.76 for environmental and engineering design.
    • CHIP Grant Acceptance (Caswell Brown Village): Approved acceptance of \$776,139 grant for infrastructure and SDC reimbursement.
    • Braun Consulting Labor Relations Agreement: Approved contract extension for \$100,000 maximum over three years for HR consultation.
    • DSHS School-to-Work Program Amendment: Approved contract extension and budget adjustment (no change in total cost: \$49,250.57).
    • Jefferson Interfaith Action Coalition (WWC): Approved \$5,000 contract for emergency sheltering services.
    • Cascade Community Connections (IDD Employment): Approved \$63,444.00 renewal for supported IDD employment services at Solid Waste.
    • DOH Consolidated Contracts Amendments #2 & #3: Approved additive amendments totaling \$503,931 (Federal/State funds) for multiple JCPH programs (WIC, SSP, BEACH, Public Health Workforce, OSS, Opioid Campaign).

Public Comments

No public comment on the Consent Agenda before the vote.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • PFD Creation Hearing Notice: Moved the hearing to April 14th at 2:30 p.m. (00:40:07).
  • CHIP Grant Acceptance: The grant is for \$776,139 to fund utility infrastructure and reimburse waived System Development Charges (00:41:27).
  • Braun Consulting Agreement: Maximum expenditure of \$100,000 over a three-year term, covering labor negotiations and HR consultation (00:43:44).

Financials

  • PFD Hearing: No financial information discussed directly.
  • CHIP Grant: \$776,139 accepted for Caswell Brown Village (00:40:44).
  • Braun Agreement: \$33,000 per year, total maximum cost of \$100,000 (00:44:53).
  • Rhody Drive Project: Transportation Improvement Program item (00:46:17).
  • DOH Consolidated Contracts: Amendments totaled \$503,931 (00:45:35).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • The public hearing date for the PFD creation was amended to April 14th at 2:30 p.m. (00:40:07).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: The motion to approve and adopt the consent agenda with the amendment to Item 1 (PFD hearing date change) was approved.
  • Vote: Unanimous (Aye: 3).
  • Next Steps:
  • - Staff (Carolyn Gallaway): Will update the PFD hearing notice (00:40:34).
  • - DCD/Public Works: Continue implementation of various approved projects and contracts (Implicit).

Employee Recognition Program Resolution

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:06:02.000–01:14:35.000
  • Agenda Item: Resolution to Establish an Employee Recognition Program
  • Categories: personnel, budgeting

Topic Summary

County Administrator Mark McCauley proposed a resolution to formally establish and fund an employee recognition program, specifically covering the costs for the Annual Employee Picnic and the Tax Blues Breakfast. Historically, the employee-led committee (PERC) fundraised for these events, causing undue stress on staff. The resolution aims to demonstrate the County's commitment to organizational health by providing official funding, estimated at less than \$10,000 annually, ensuring the events are perceived as genuine recognition rather than staff-funded parties.

Key Discussion Points

  • The establishment of the program is part of the County's Organizational Health strategic plan goal (01:06:18).
  • The Public Employee Recognition Committee (PERC) members frequently expressed stress over having to raise money for key events like the annual picnic and Tax Blues Breakfast (01:09:03).
  • The Prosecuting Attorney’s Office determined that a formal resolution establishing the program and applying it to all employees would not be considered a gift of public funds (01:07:41).
  • Commissioners emphasized that funding these events is a highly efficient use of money (less than \$10,000 annually) and a basic service that nearly all businesses or nonprofits provide to affirm employee value (01:12:20).
  • The Tax Blues Breakfast is particularly important for recognizing Public Works road crew members, who often start working before dawn (01:10:18).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Resolution: Resolution in the matter of creating an employer recognition program and authorizing funding for the annual employee picnic, Tax Blues Breakfast, and other appropriate events.
  • Financials (Packet): Costs are estimated to be less than \$10,000 annually.

Financials

  • Estimated Annual Cost: Less than \$10,000 (01:12:43).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Commissioner Eisenhour suggested potentially finding funds for a third recognition event in South County (District 3) (01:13:50).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve and adopt the resolution creating an Employee Recognition Program and authorizing funding for specified events was approved.
  • Vote: Unanimous (Aye: 3).
  • Next Steps:
  • - PERC/County Administrator: Proceed with funding the Annual Employee Picnic and Tax Blues Breakfast (Implicit).

West End Road Conditions Update

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:08:34.000–02:17:48.000
  • Agenda Item: Update on Roads (Called via Public Comment)
  • Categories: infrastructure, emergency, public safety

Topic Summary

Public Works Director Eric Kuzma provided an update on the immediate road impacts following heavy rains. He confirmed the situation on Oil City Road, where a culvert was overwhelmed, causing a section of the road surface to wash out, cutting off residents. He indicated that while a permanent fix for Oil City Road is planned for next year, emergency repairs using county forces and stockpiled material are underway. Kuzma also provided an update on Upper Hoe Road landslides and the status of funding for South Shore Road repairs as part of the broader regional emergency declaration.

Key Discussion Points

  • The Governor's emergency declaration for South Shore Road is in the court of FHWA and DOT, and the request needs authorization from Washington D.C. as part of the widespread "bomb cyclone" event funding (02:10:28).
  • The County will seek a loan from CRAB (County Roads Administration Board) for up to two (possibly three) years to bridge funding if high-certainty of FHWA funding is established (02:11:49).
  • Heavy rain (six inches) over the weekend caused a new washout on Oil City Road. Two 48-inch culverts were overwhelmed, pulling out all the fill, making it impassable; residents are cut off (02:13:35).
  • Oil City road is slated for replacement next year with FLAP funds, but must be repaired immediately to regain access for stranded residents, including an 80-year-old woman with a doctor's appointment (02:16:53).
  • Upper Hoe Road experienced new landslides. The crew had the first one cleared to one lane by 4 a.m. last night and is currently clearing the remaining two (02:16:18).
  • Kuzma confirmed that Oil City emergency repairs would be manageable with county forces and stockpiled material and would be much cheaper than Hoe Road repairs (02:14:20).
  • North Shore Road Closure: Kuzma confirmed the closure for repair of a 2021 disaster is a WSDOT/Park project and is expected to shut down for 2–3 months this summer (June/July/August/September timeframe) (02:18:43).

Public Comments

  • Ed Bowen (via comments earlier in the meeting) requested clarification on the emergency declaration and communication strategy for West End roads (02:09:54).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Photos of the Oil City Road washout were shared by Eric Kuzma (02:14:14).

Financials

  • South Shore Road: Waiting on FHWA ER funds; potential CRAB loan for bridging funds (02:11:49).
  • Oil City Road: Cost to repair should be manageable with county forces; much cheaper than Hoe Road (02:15:43).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Oil City Road: Repair using county forces and stockpiled material as the road is scheduled for full replacement next year via FLAP funds (02:12:57).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; informational.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - Public Works Crew: Continue clearing Upper Hoe Road landslides and commence emergency repairs on Oil City Road (02:16:26).
  • - Eric Kuzma: Will follow up with Ed Bowen regarding the query on the funding source (FLAP) for the Big Creek/North Shore Road project (02:18:43).

County-Wide Migration to Microsoft Office 365

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:21:47.000–02:39:04.000
  • Agenda Item: County-Wide Migration to Office 365
  • Categories: operations, budgeting

Topic Summary

IT Director Sean (no last name provided) presented a proposal for migrating the entire county from legacy one-time software licensing to a user-focused Microsoft Office 365 subscription model (G3 license). This move is necessary due to Microsoft phasing out one-time licenses. Key advantages include universal access to Teams, collaborative tools like SharePoint/OneDrive, transferability of user licenses, and improved security. The main drawback is the significant ongoing annual cost of approximately \$141,000, offset by a one-time \$80,000 grant from the Auditor's office for election security.

Key Discussion Points

  • Justification: Microsoft has moved away from one-time licenses to a subscription-based, user-focused model (02:22:17). The old licensing portal is closed, and the County needs to modernize.
  • Advantages: Universal access to Teams meetings, collaborative tools like SharePoint and OneDrive, remote file access (cloud storage), and increased security/more frequent updates (02:23:43).
  • The new licensing model allows for transferability of user licenses as staff change (02:22:57).
  • Compatibility: State partners rely heavily on Teams, and the current system is "really clunky" for connecting satellite departments like Public Health (02:38:02).
  • Cost (Annual): The subscription will cost approximately \$141,000 annually for the entire county (02:28:23).
  • Cost (Offset): A one-time \$80,000 grant from the Auditor’s office, specifically for election security, is available to fund year one implementation (02:30:01).
  • Budget Impact: The implementation cost in year one, net of the grant and factoring in existing maintenance costs, is estimated at \$39,000, rising to approximately \$141,000 annually thereafter (02:30:21).
  • Staffing: IT staff believe the new system will result in significant time savings on routine maintenance, allowing staff to reallocate time to other productive tasks (02:35:05).
  • Software Elimination: The change provides the option for departments to eliminate duplicative, subscription-based products like Zoom, saving internal departmental costs (02:30:42).

Public Comments

  • Apple (Public Health Director): Commented that the new system would be significantly smoother and leaner, noting the difficulty Public Health currently has engaging with state partners who are all on Teams (02:38:02).

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Total Annual Cost (Recurring): Approximately \$141,000 (02:28:23).
  • One-Time Grant: \$80,000 (from Auditor's office for election security) (02:30:01).
  • Existing Annual Costs to be folded in: \$22,705 for Exchange licenses (02:29:33).
  • Net Cost Year One: Anticipated closer to \$39,000 (02:30:21).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • The Chief Strategy Officer suggested asking the presenter to include assessment of staff cost impacts (potential reduction in staff costs or reallocation of time) in the final proposal, as this is a real budget question (02:33:03).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; proposal needs further refinement.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - IT Director: Will return for a workshop to present specific budgetary implications, including staff time savings and negative/positive staff impacts (02:39:04).

Community Outreach Meetings for 2025

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:39:25.000–02:51:35.000
  • Agenda Item: Community Outreach Meetings for 2025
  • Categories: outreach, operations

Topic Summary

The Board discussed the ongoing planning for the 2025 Community Outreach Meetings (COMs), which are county-wide events involving Commissioners, elected officials, and department directors that facilitate public engagement. Commissioners agreed these events are valuable, especially for rural communities like South County, but noted they are "hit and miss" in Port Townsend and sometimes suffer from poor advertising and hybrid participation issues (e.g., poor Wi-Fi and lack of engagement tools for online attendees). Staff are actively working on finalizing the schedule.

Key Discussion Points

  • Tentative dates and placeholder locations for COMs were shared for June, July, August, September, and October. October 22nd is currently set for the Ho Tribal Chambers (02:43:37).
  • Commissioners unanimously find the COMs valuable, particularly for reaching rural residents in South County (02:50:11).
  • Past issues included low turnout in Port Townsend and the need for better outreach, possibly targeting specific themes (02:44:20).
  • The hybrid format has limitations: Wi-Fi can be poor in rural locations (e.g., Port Ludlow), and the format discourages in-person speed-dating/breakout groups (02:48:18).
  • Suggestions for improvement included inviting city representatives (Mayor/Administrator) to Port Townsend meetings to address city/county collaboration, and establishing a separate, purely virtual event better designed for Zoom breakouts/high-flex participation (02:51:02).
  • The COMs are expected to be especially useful this year for explaining the potential impacts of two forthcoming property tax measures (02:45:24).

Public Comments

  • No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Tentative draft schedule of dates (June-October 2025) (02:43:37).

Financials

  • Outreach typically involves paid advertisements in the county papers and social media posts (02:44:28).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Commissioner Eisenhour suggested increasing coordination by trying to mimic previous successful formats or potentially using different formats for each event to attract various participants (02:47:31).
  • Suggested tailoring Port Townsend meetings to address the perception that city residents do not need to engage with county government (02:51:02).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; informational.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - Clerk/Admin Staff (Wendy): Continue finalizing the schedule, prioritizing dates when all Commissioners can attend (02:42:05).
  • - BoCC/Staff: Engage the Production Alliance (during their adjacent agenda item) for assistance with brainstorming better communication/outreach strategies (02:48:52).

Department and Elected Officials Roundtable Updates

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:51:47.000–03:20:41.000
  • Agenda Item: Roundtable (Coordination Meeting)
  • Categories: budgeting, planning, land use, infrastructure, operations

Topic Summary

The County’s elected officials and department directors provided rapid, high-level updates. DCD Director Josh Peters emphasized the Short-Term Rental (STR) deliberating today, the impending 2025 Growth Management Act (GMA) periodic update (focused heavily on housing and critical areas), and a forthcoming master plan resort subdivision application for Black Point. Treasurer Patty (no last name provided) highlighted the complexity of the Annual Report, the due date for property tax (April 30th), and the challenges presented by new property tax measures. IT Director Sean discussed the progress on migrating servers to the new data room (Pritter) and the Munis EPL migration. Environmental Public Health Director Apple Martine updated the group on moving staff to the Public Health Annex and the recruitment for a new Environmental Public Health Manager.

Key Discussion Points

  • Treasurer (Patty): Property tax is due April 30th (02:52:39). Preparing the Annual Report requires intense collaboration (Auditor/Treasurer/Finance) due to increasingly strict auditing rules (02:53:12).
  • DCD (Josh Peters):
    • STRs: Deliberations continue today; final ordinance expected by April 7th (moratorium end) (02:56:06).
    • GMA Periodic Update: Underway, due end of 2025. Focus on planning for 4,000 new housing units by income band and reviewing Critical Areas (02:56:18–02:57:13).
    • Black Point Master Plan Resort: New subdivision submittal with revised plans is expected, which will impact the previously scheduled May 16th hearing date (02:57:34).
    • Water Utility Coordinating Committee (WUCC): Consultant is working on the Coordinated Water System Plan update (03:01:51).
    • Stock Plans: Working on agreements and engineering to make finalized, pre-approved building plans available to reduce housing development costs (03:02:08).
  • Assessor (Jeff Chapman): Appraisers are revaluing the City of Port Townsend, going door-to-door (03:02:15). He noted ongoing software glitches but also the policy reality that appraisers have the right to be on property for valuation but cannot question owners about STR use without explicit permission (03:03:10).
  • IT (Sean): Critter (new server room) is operational, and migration is underway (Sheriff's Office servers almost complete). This work clears dependencies for the Munis EPL migration (03:05:20–03:06:50).
  • Finance (Judy): Feeling a crunch, particularly in Accounts Payable, which processes over 1,400 invoices per month with only one staff member (03:08:44).
  • Auditor: Collecting the new Transportation Benefit District (TBD) $20 vehicle fee, effective around July 13th. Preparing for logistical challenges, including determining if the fee applies to renewals printed before the effective date and requiring proof of residency for address changes due to different fees inside/outside the district (03:10:33–03:11:30).
  • Public Health (Apple Martine): Successfully moved teams to the Public Health Annex (Castle Hill) (03:12:32). Secured an internal hire for the Community Health Improvement Program Manager (03:13:15). JCPH is involved in Comp Plan revisions (climate/health elements). Upcoming: opening a fourth clinic at Blue Heron School (03:14:34).
  • Strategy/Health (Brent Butler): Staff-level kickoff imminent for the Mill Road lift station/force main project (03:15:27). Stock plans are rolling out. Pursuing a call for middle housing plans to incentivize Tri-Area development (03:16:06).
  • District Court (Brian/Judge Walker): Preparing for an upgrade to the Odyssey case management system, which will replace 1980s-era blue screen technology in District Court (03:18:04).

Public Comments

No general public comment during the roundtable, but previous road questions were referenced.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The STR presentation materials were posted to the DCD website (03:19:35).

Financials

  • Accounts Payable: Processing 1,400+ invoices monthly (03:08:44).
  • TBD Fee: Collection of a new \$20 vehicle fee (03:10:33).
  • Munis EPL: Migration is a large financial/administrative project (03:06:50).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; informational.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - BoCC: Reconvene for a scheduled Executive Session at 1:32 p.m. (03:22:33), followed by the STR Hearing Continuation at 2:00 p.m. (03:23:16).

Noxious Weed Control Program Update

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:15:43.000–01:46:09.000
  • Agenda Item: Noxious Weed Control Program 2024 Retrospective and 2025 Workplan
  • Categories: environment, operations, services, budgeting

Topic Summary

Noxious Weed Coordinator Sophie DeGroot presented her 2024 wrap-up and 2025 work plan, emphasizing the program's dual focus on surveying/controlling and education/outreach. In 2024, the program significantly increased its reach, treating 295 acres (up 96%) and removing over 11,000 lbs of Scotch broom. Key concerns included controlling toxic species like poison hemlock, the new listing of holly as a noxious weed, and the program's dependence on year-by-year grant funding (e.g., Title II). DeGroot highlighted a major goal for 2025: increasing the number of "weed free" certified gravel and wood chip pits to prevent the spread of infestations via aggregate material.

Key Discussion Points

  • Mission: Focuses on surveying, controlling, education/outreach, and enforcement to prevent land degradation from noxious weeds (01:20:25).
  • 2024 Achievements: Treated 295 acres (up 96%) primarily by the coordinator and one part-time staff member (Alexa, welcomed back for 2025) (01:21:36).
  • WCC Crew: Washington Conservation Corps crews provided 1,750 member hours, manually removing over 11,000 pounds of Scotch broom from the PUD corridor (01:22:06).
  • Communication: Sent 460 letters/postcards to residents, frequently educating on new infestations like Spurge Laurel around Uptown, finding this low-cost outreach is highly effective (01:23:57).
  • State Park Work: Treated 52 acres of Holly (now a newly listed state noxious weed) at Anderson Lake and over 60 acres of Knotweed along the Dosie Wallops River with the Salmon Enhancement Group (01:30:26).
  • Road Prioritization: Public Works gives the Weed Board discretion on priority weeds. Current focus is on Wild Chervil along 101/Eagle Mount to prevent its spread into Clallam County (01:34:23).
  • Staffing: Increased to a 2.15 staff next year after securing an ongoing Title II grant for \$27,500 (01:25:55). (Note: The grant is year-by-year, and reimbursement for 2024 is delayed) (01:27:06).
  • Future Goal (Weed Free Pits): Increasing the number of certified weed-free pits (gravel, aggregate, wood chips) is crucial. This is a voluntary program where operators must opt in, but education helps the public demand the certification (01:42:07).
  • Yard Waste: Scotch broom with seeds/flowers must be bagged and trashed; materials without seeds can be taken to yard waste or left on site (01:36:17).
  • Weed Board Vacancies: Still seeking a member from District 4 (West Jefferson) (01:16:36).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Images/Maps of work at Fort Worden, Solid Waste Facility, and County Roads (Old Eagle Mount) (01:29:14).
  • Financials in packet noted \$27,500 Title II funding.

Financials

  • Title II Grant Funding: \$27,500 (year-by-year funding, with some reimbursement delay risk) (01:27:06).
  • Partnership Costs: Solid Waste Division contract is not continuing this year, requiring an alternative management plan (01:30:41).
  • Staffing Cost: The cost of hiring one seasonal part-time position is covered by the Title II grant (01:26:13).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Discussion on whether to pursue using volunteers (currently too much for existing full-time staff to manage) (01:35:02).
  • Discussion on whether the county/city pits need treatment (they are important vectors for spread but funding may not be sufficient for large treatments yet) (01:40:16).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; informational status report.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - Weed Coordinator: Continue recruitment for District 4 Weed Board member (01:16:36).
  • - Weed Coordinator: Focus on building the voluntary Weed Free Pit Inspection program and utilizing new grant-funded staff (01:40:54).

Deliberation and Potential Action on Short-Term Rental (STR) Code Amendments (Continuation)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:23:27.000–04:31:21.000; 05:07:20.000–05:15:55.000
  • Agenda Item: Hearing Continuation and Potential Action regarding Short-Term Rentals
  • Categories: land use, ordinances, planning

Topic Summary

The Board, joined by DCD staff Greg Ballard, continued their detailed deliberation on the STR code amendments, comparing the Planning Commission's (PC) version against the DCD Staff Recommendations. The primary focus was on reconciling differences in: (1) The cap implementation and proportional distribution requirements, (2) The removal of PC residency requirements (due to Dormant Commerce Clause concerns), and (3) The enforcement capacity for dealing with potentially hundreds of illegal STRs. After legal advice regarding the need for further synthesis, the Board ultimately directed DCD staff to take the combined DCD/PAO version back to the Planning Commission for feedback before the final vote on April 7th, the day the moratorium expires.

Key Discussion Points

  • Legal Issues (Residency/Dormant Commerce Clause): The Planning Commission's requirement that the owner/qualified representative be on-site during the entire rental period was identified as difficult to enforce and potentially illegal due to the Dormant Commerce Clause violation (04:03:03). The PAO advised against the PC residency rules (04:06:55).
  • DCD Solution (One Per Operator): DCD staff’s proposed solution to mitigate commercialization is limiting short-term rentals to one per operator county-wide, regardless of where the operator lives (04:32:53).
  • Commercialization Disincentive: The PC's two-year waiting period for rentals of six+ bedrooms was designed to discourage investment purchases for sole business use (04:16:03); DCD opted for the "one per operator" provision as a simpler, more elegant solution (04:16:14).
  • Non-Conforming Use: DCD recommends a tiered approach (4A, 4B, 4C): STRs predating the UDC (Jan 2001) are legal non-conforming but must get a permit/inspection; STRs permitted after 2001 maintain their status; others fall under the cap (03:47:11).
  • Proportional Cap: The DCD model proposes a 4% cap (468 units) based on OFM dwelling units, proportionally distributed by zip code housing stock (03:53:06). This aims to balance the concern that some communities (e.g., Cape George, Brinnon) are disproportionately impacted (03:57:41).
  • Enforcement: Enforcement will transition from purely complaint-based (Tier 3 priority during the moratorium) to proactive review of listings/platforms, identifying properties without the newly required DCD permit number listed in advertising (04:21:40).
    • Prosecutor Philip Hunsucker stressed that enforcement success depends on making operators apply for permits; if they fail to comply, the county incurs significant enforcement costs without corresponding permit revenue (04:29:12).
  • Grace Period: DCD recommends a 6-month grace period after adoption to process all STR applications before the cap takes effect (03:52:16).
  • Signage: DCD allows one up to 4 sq. ft. identification sign to help visitors find the rental (03:36:17).

Public Comments

  • Philip Hunsucker (Prosecuting Attorney): Stressed the economic reality of enforcement—if operators do not apply for permits, the county lacks revenue and incurs high enforcement costs. Emphasized that code directors now have enforcement authority beyond complaint-based actions (04:29:12).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • DCD Staff Report Appendix B: Comparison chart of current code, PC recommendation, and DCD staff recommendation (03:24:15).
  • PAO Review: Legal concern (via the PAO) regarding the PC’s residency requirements violating the dormant commerce clause (04:06:55).

Financials

  • Permitting Fees: Permit applications generate revenue, which is crucial for funding enforcement (04:28:22).
  • Enforcement Cost: Enforcement of non-compliant STRs is costly and requires significant resources/staff (04:28:36).
  • Fire/Life Safety Fee: \$294 for the inspection (03:50:21).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Parking: PC wanted one additional parking space per bedroom for units with six+ rooms; DCD opposed this strict ratio, preferring to keep the code requirement of "all required parking spaces on site as determined by DCD" (04:10:26).
  • Cap Refinement: Commissioner Eisenhour requested that DCD check with the GIS expert (Kevin Hitchcock) on the complexity of distributing the cap by voting precinct rather than postal zip code, to address hyper-local community impacts (03:58:17).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: The motion to continue deliberation to April 7th and direct DCD staff to share the DCD/PAO synthesis back to the Planning Commission (April 2nd) was approved.
  • Vote: Unanimous (Aye: 3).
  • Next Steps:
  • - DCD Staff (Josh Peters/Greg Ballard): Present the DCD/PAO synthesis to the Planning Commission on April 2nd (05:11:07).
  • - BoCC: Final deliberation and potential action on April 7th (05:15:04).
  • - Staff (Carolyn Gallaway): Note the need for a final executive session later in the day (04:27:57).

Gateway Visitor Center Paving Design Options Workshop

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:48:06.000–01:05:48.000
  • Agenda Item: Workshop regarding initial options for paving design for the Gateway Visitor Center
  • Categories: infrastructure, planning, operations, services

Topic Summary

Commissioner Brotherton led a workshop, joined by Jefferson Transit Director Nicole (no last name provided), to review four conceptual paving designs for the Gateway Visitor Center. The goal is to facilitate a transit hub where Clallam’s Strait Shot (Route 123) and JTA’s Kingston Express (Route 14) can safely connect. The preferred conceptual option (SP-3) requires removing the existing building but offers the best solution: completely separating bus circulation from private vehicle circulation and allowing space for safe bus transfers. Discussion included JTA's rapidly growing Route 14 ridership and the potential for the site to become a dedicated JTA facility.

Key Discussion Points

  • The project is funded by a JTA grant to accommodate the Clallam Transit's Strait Shot Route 123 connection with JTA’s Route 14 (Kingston Express) (00:48:27).
  • Option SP-1B/Existing Building was one of the two options selected for further development, although it posed complex bus circulation issues (00:51:30).
  • Option SP-3/Remove Building was the second preferred design, creating completely separated bus and private vehicle circulation (54 parking stalls), viewed as the safest and most optimal solution for transfers (00:52:54).
  • JTA Context: Director Nicole confirmed Route 14 (Kingston Express) ridership has "really exploded" since it went zero-fare and is JTA's fastest-growing route (00:56:49).
  • The location is ideal for consolidating JTA routes and the Clallam Strait Shot, providing safe transfer location, which JTA currently lacks (00:57:42).
  • The discussion raised the long-term question of whether the County should transfer the property to JTA if its highest and best use is as a transit hub (00:56:14).
  • The project is aligned with JTA's new Climate Action Plan (Dec 2024), which seeks better connections to encourage transit use and lower greenhouse gas emissions (01:03:06).
  • The project's current grant ensures the design phase reaches around 95% completion (00:59:50); further grants will be needed for construction, including bathrooms/shelters and planned electric car chargers (01:00:03).

Public Comments

  • JTA Director Nicole provided substantive operational comments on bus usage and the need for safe transfer spots (00:56:37).

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Conceptual plans (SP-1A, SP-1B, SP-2, SP-3) developed by SCJ Alliance (00:48:44).
  • JTA Climate Action Plan (December 2024) (01:03:06).

Financials

  • The design phase is funded by a \$90,000 grant from JTA (00:48:27; 00:59:50).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Four different paving design concepts were reviewed and discussed, with two being selected for further development: Option 1B (retaining the building) and Option 3 (removing the building, full separation) (00:55:40).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; Commissioners approved the direction of design filtering set by JTA and staff (01:05:36).
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - SCJ Alliance (Consultant): Continue developing the two selected design options (Option 1B and Option 3) (00:55:40).
  • - BoCC/JTA: Discussion on potential property transfer to JTA and building removal will occur at a future meeting (00:58:14).

Connectivity Summit 2024 Retrospective and Future Plans (Production Alliance)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 04:31:52.000–05:05:51.000
  • Agenda Item: Connectivity Summit 2024 Debrief and 2026 Funding Request
  • Categories: outreach, community development, services

Topic Summary

The Board met with Zach and Danny (Production Alliance) to review the success of the March 7-9 Connectivity Summit. The summit saw an estimated 1,500 total attendees (including 600 students from all three high schools) and 140 organizational representatives, significantly increasing participation from previous years. Key feedback areas included: the schedule was too condensed (especially for senior high school students), the need for better communication, and the ultimate need for follow-up projects, two of which were identified: a high school student discount program for local amenities and the refreshing of the Uptown Recreation Center. The Production Alliance requested transitioning to a multi-year contract to improve planning for 2026.

Key Discussion Points

  • Attendance: Estimated total attendance of 1,500 people, including 600 students, 150 organizational representatives, and 250 general public on Saturday (04:34:57). This compares favorably to the previous year's 90 organizations (04:34:21).
  • Key Success: Strong participation from Quilsene, Chimacum, and Port Townsend high school students; strong engagement with 160 survey responses (04:35:18).
  • Feedback (Negative): The schedule was too tight, especially the transition times (04:36:38). Port Townsend High School seniors only had about 15 minutes for the tabling fair due to a bus issue, which was the "biggest whiff" of the event (04:41:00).
  • Key Policy Focus - Disengaged Youth: The event specifically focused on engaging the "disengaged youth" (those not in school and not working), which Jefferson County has the highest percentage of in the state (04:46:24; 04:47:40).
  • Follow-up Projects Identified by Youth:
    1. A student discount program for high school students to access local amenities (low-hanging fruit) (04:50:28).
    2. Revitalization/refresh of the Uptown Recreation Center (Rec Center), which needs facility improvements (04:51:14).
  • Future Funding: The Production Alliance requested a multi-year contract for the 2026 summit to allow for better planning, aligning with the County's five-year strategic plan (04:44:22; 04:53:13).
  • Emergency Preparedness Picnic: The Production Alliance is co-sponsoring the All-County Picnic, renamed the Preparedness Picnic, set for June 28th at Finn River, featuring a morning workshop (9 a.m. to noon) focused on emergency preparedness skills (04:54:21).

Public Comments

No general public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Post-Summit Report (not provided in packet) (04:32:21).

Financials

  • The Production Alliance is seeking a multi-year funding commitment for the 2026 summit (04:53:13).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Discussion on how to improve next year's outreach, possibly by recruiting engaged volunteers (youth and adults) from the West End/Quilsene to brainstorm better access and involvement (04:44:47).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken; high approval of the event results.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps:
  • - Production Alliance/Mark McCauley: Follow up on potentially drafting a multi-year contract for the 2026 Connectivity Summit (04:53:13).
  • - BoCC/Production Alliance: Strategize on how to incorporate Production Alliance's expertise to amplify outreach for the County's general Community Outreach Meetings (04:57:36).
  • - Production Alliance: Will share video footage from the summit (Ignite Talks, youth presentation) with the Commissioners (04:49:03).

Letters of Support for Federal Appropriations Requests

Metadata

  • Time Range: 05:17:23.000–05:24:41.000
  • Agenda Item: Approve and Sign Letters of Support for CDS Requests
  • Categories: housing, infrastructure, services, contracts

Topic Summary

The Board proceeded with the approval of several Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) letters of support: Three identical letters for the Ho Tribe's water/wastewater utility and resiliency center relocation projects, one for Mason PUD No. 1's Jorstad Substation (grid resiliency for Brinnon residents), and one for Bayside Housing and Services' affordable housing preservation/development project. The Bayside letter was specifically checked to confirm it involved support only, not fiscal sponsorship, to avoid conflict with the Habitat for Humanity CDS request the county is already fiscally brokering. All letters received public support from Shelly Arnell.

Key Discussion Points

  • Ho Tribe (Resiliency/Wastewater): Approved three identical letters to the federal legislative delegation supporting the Ho Tribe's request to fund water and wastewater systems for the Highlands relocation project (moving out of the tsunami zone) (02:06:33).
  • Mason PUD Jorstad Substation: Approved a letter supporting the PUD’s \$6 million request for construction of a middle-mile substation to provide redundancy and cut power outage times for Brinnon residents (05:17:23).
  • Bayside Housing and Services: Approved a letter of support to Patty Murray’s office for Bayside’s request to fund the 23+ unit preservation and 8 new unit creation projects at Woodley Place and the Old Alcohol Plant (05:20:22).
    • This project also includes a generator to enable the Old Alcohol Plant facility (where 20 units are located) to be used as a regional emergency facility (05:21:24).
    • It was confirmed that the Bayside request is for support only and does not require county fiscal sponsorship (05:22:55).
  • Public Comment: Shelly Arnell provided rare positive public comment, fully supporting the letter to Mason PUD No. 1, calling them "amazing" (05:18:22).

Public Comments

  • Shelly Arnell (online): Fully supports the letter to Mason PUD No. 1.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Draft letter of support for Bayside Housing and Services (05:19:15).
  • Mason County PUD No. 1 Jorstad Substation Grid Resiliency Project (Packet context) (05:17:23).

Financials

  • The Bayside project seeks funding for preserving and adding affordable housing units (05:20:22).
  • The Mason PUD project seeks \$6 million for construction (Packet context) (05:17:23).

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: The motion to approve signing all three Ho Tribe letters and the Mason PUD letter was passed. The separate motion to approve signing the letter of support for Bayside Housing and Services was passed.
  • Vote (Ho & Mason PUD): Unanimous (Aye: 3).
  • Vote (Bayside Housing): Unanimous (Aye: 3).
  • Next Steps:
  • - BoCC/Clerk (Carolyn Gallaway): Sign and submit all five approved letters to the respective congressional delegations (05:24:02).
  • - Clerk (Requested): Ensure email versions of the Mason PUD and Ho Tribe letters are sent to the correct delegation offices (05:24:37).

Adoption of Official Newspaper of Record (Annual Bid)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:48:18.000–02:02:44.000
  • Agenda Item: Discussion and Potential Action on Official Newspaper of Record
  • Categories: contracts, operations

Topic Summary

The Board deliberated on awarding the annual contract for the Official County Newspaper of Record, comparing bids from The Port Townsend – Jefferson County Leader and the Peninsula Daily News (PDN), based on the statutory requirements of "best and lowest responsible bidder," prioritizing "widest publicity/circulation." Despite the PDN offering a significantly lower cost per sample ad, the Board chose The Leader, citing vastly superior print circulation within Jefferson County (19.4% reach vs. 3.4%) as the decisive factor for fulfilling the "widest publicity" requirement.

Key Discussion Points

  • The legal requirement (RCW 36.72.075) prioritizes widest publicity/circulation over the lowest cost (01:51:12).
  • Print Circulation (Decisive Factor): The Leader reaches ~19.4% of the County population, while the PDN reaches ~3.4% (01:57:52).
  • Cost: PDN is cheaper per column inch and for running sample ads (01:54:46). PDN's pricing has historically led to higher invoices than anticipated (02:01:04).
  • Online Reach Disparity: The Leader's electronic metrics were drastically lower this year compared to last year's estimate (E-subscriptions: 411 vs. 10,966 last year) (01:49:21). However, the PDN's electronic circulation covers the entire Olympic Peninsula, not just Jefferson County, making the print circulation a better metric for local reach (01:51:38).
  • Concerns about the Leader publishing only once a week (causing a potential one-week delay in notices) were dismissed as having minimal real-world impact (01:55:15).
  • The Leader, as a local and independent company, is seen as more focused on Jefferson County than the PDN, which is part of a larger system (01:58:31).

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Bid Comparison Chart: Showcased cost (per column inch), circulation (print and electronic), and sample ad costs (01:49:03).

Financials

  • Leader Cost: \$12.90 per column inch (01:53:40).
  • PDN Cost: \$8.75 per column inch (01:54:46).

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Considered but rejected the PDN due to low local circulation despite lower cost (01:57:52).

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to select The Port Townsend – Jefferson County Leader as the Official County Newspaper of Record for 2025 was approved.
  • Vote: Unanimous (Aye: 3).
  • Next Steps:
  • - Clerk of the Board (Carolyn Gallaway): Draft the contract to be approved on the April 7th agenda (01:59:51).

Executive Session

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:22:33.000–03:23:11.000; 05:05:51.000–05:07:20.000 (Substantive content from 01:46:48.000–01:47:13.000)
  • Agenda Item: Executive Session (Potential Litigation Exemption)
  • Categories: legal, personnel

Topic Summary

The Board recessed for two Executive Sessions related to potential litigation, personnel, and negotiation topics, with the Prosecuting Attorney, County Administrator, and DCD staff present. The first session lasted 30 minutes (10:47 a.m. to 11:17 a.m.); the second lasted 30 minutes (1:32 p.m. to 2:02 p.m.). A third short session of 15 minutes was requested by the Prosecuting Attorney after the STR Hearing continuation and was held later in the day (3:47 p.m. to 4:02 p.m.). No action was taken coming out of any session.

Key Discussion Points

  • First Session (10:47 a.m.): Discussed potential litigation (RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)). (01:46:48)
  • Second Session (1:32 p.m.): Discussed potential litigation (RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)), involving DCD Director and Code Compliance Coordinator. (03:22:05)
  • Third Session (3:47 p.m.): Short session requested by PAO, also focused on litigation exemption. (05:06:15)

Public Comments

There was no public comment on the Executive Sessions.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Open Public Meetings Act, RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).

Financials

No financial information discussed during or after the Executive Sessions (other than general context that the topics likely relate to the financial risks discussed in the STR hearing).

Alternatives & Amendments

None discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: No action taken following any of the three sessions.
  • Vote: N/A
  • Next Steps: Implicit follow-up on legal advice received during the sessions.

Generated On: 2025-11-07 13:59:18.296408-08:00 By: google/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 running on https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/