MEETING: Untitled Meeting at Mon, Oct 28, 05:07 PM

County Sources

Packet Contents

AI Information

JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL MEETING SUMMARY

Meeting Information

  • Date: 2024-10-28

UGA Ordinance and Core Area Scope

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:01:03.000–00:01:51.000
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated
  • Categories: infrastructure, planning, ordinances

Topic Summary

The special meeting was called to discuss the proposed ordinances for the full Fort Hadlock Urban Growth Area (UGA) sewer system. Although the ordinances cover the entire UGA, the initial phase (Phase One) and current grant funding are concentrated in the "core area," which was outlined in white on a displayed poster. Incentives within the ordinance will apply to the core area while grant money is available, and incentives are also built in for future extensions north of the core area once the initial funding is exhausted.

Key Discussion Points

  • The ordinances apply to the whole Fort Hadlock UGA, but the current project (Phase One) is concentrated within the core sewer area [00:01:03.000].
  • Sam Harper (Project Manager): Incentives are structured to cover both the core area (while grants are active) and future extensions outside the core area [00:01:27.000].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • No financial information discussed in this section.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational discussion on the scope of the ordinance.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: None specified.

Sewer Ordinance Chapter Framework (Title 13)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:02:08.000–00:06:03.000
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated
  • Categories: ordinances, operations, contracts

Topic Summary

The county is establishing a completely new Chapter 13 for the sewer utility code, marking its first utility outside of road and storm management. The ordinance was developed collaboratively by Public Works, the Prosecuting Attorney's Office (Philip Hemsachter mentioned as providing assistance), Community Development, and Environmental Public Health, in coordination with Jefferson PUD. The meat of the code lies in Chapter 1304 (Connection Policy) and 1305 (Rates, Fees, and System Development Charges).

Key Discussion Points

  • This is the county’s first utility-specific code (Chapter 13), developed with extensive internal and external coordination [00:02:08.000].
  • Sam Harper (Project Manager): Highlighted that the ordinance structure is unique to the Port Hadlock sewer area [00:02:26.000].
  • The goal is to create a Port Hadlock Sewer Ordinance within the UGA, detailing engineering design standards and technical specifications, which are still being compiled from current construction bid documents (and are not included in the current draft) [00:05:19.000].
  • The proposed ordinance grants the Public Works Director, with Commissioner concurrency, the ability to enter agreements for operation, specifically referencing an Interlocal Agreement with Jefferson County PUD [00:05:29.000].
  • The new chapters span 1301 (General Provisions) through 1309 (Appeals), with focus areas being 1304 (Connection Policy), 1305 (Rates/Fees), 1306 (Discharge Permits/Pretreatment), 1308 (Latecomer Process), and 1309 (Appeals) [00:03:35.000].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • The sewer fees and rates are outlined in an Appendix to be adopted as a resolution, separate from the narrative ordinance [00:02:57.000].

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational presentation on the structure of the proposed Chapter 13 ordinances.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: None specified.

Sewer System Ownership and Maintenance

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:09:26.000–00:11:15.000
  • Agenda Item: JCC 1304 Sewer Connection Policy (in part)
  • Categories: operations, contracts, infrastructure

Topic Summary

The sewer system is designed as a low-pressure system requiring a grinder pump and tank on nearly every property connecting to it. The county (via agreement with the Jefferson County PUD) will own and maintain the system from the grinder pump's control panel, the tank, and the line out to the public right-of-way. Property owners are responsible for the building sewer line and the electrical connection from their panel to the county-provided disconnect switch.

Key Discussion Points

  • The system is a low-pressure system requiring a grinder pump system on most properties [00:09:51.000].
  • Easements on private properties are required to facilitate county/PUD maintenance access [00:09:26.000].
  • County Responsibility: Ownership and maintenance begins at the grinder pump control panel, tank, and the line to the street/public right-of-way [00:10:10.000].
  • Property Owner Responsibility: Maintenance responsibility covers the building sewer line and the electrical connection from the main panel to the disconnect switch [00:10:27.000].
  • A diagram was presented showing the components, including an optional grease interceptor for non-residential/commercial properties [00:10:34.000].

Public Comments

  • Russ (Attendee): Clarified that the county's responsibility goes to the shutoff switch on the electrical system [00:10:55.000].

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced beyond diagrams presented in the slideshow.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational presentation on ownership and maintenance responsibilities.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: None specified.

Connection Requirements (JCC 1304 Table)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:12:17.000–00:29:21.000
  • Agenda Item: JCC 1304 Sewer Connection Policy
  • Categories: ordinances, planning, land use

Topic Summary

The core of JCC 1304 outlines when connection to the new sewer system is mandatory. The county is taking a "lighter touch" approach than many other jurisdictions, attempting to avoid forcing existing residential properties with functional septic systems to connect immediately, even if sewer is available (within 200 feet). Mandatory connection is primarily triggered by new urban-level development, major modifications requiring a septic upgrade, and non-residential properties with high water usage (>1 ERU). The requirement for existing single-family residences to connect at the time of sale is still unresolved and remains a point of deliberation.

Key Discussion Points

  • Definition of Sewer Available: Within 200 feet of the parcel [00:13:56.000].
  • Mandatory Connection Triggers (Examples):
    • Existing structures (SFD or duplex) with inadequate septic, where sewer is available [00:17:21.000].
    • New construction (SFD, ADU, Multifamily, Non-Residential) [00:20:56.000].
    • Major modifications (defined as requiring septic system upgrade) to any structure where sewer is available [00:19:00.000].
    • Existing Non-Residential properties using more than one ERU per month (over 4,000 gallons), regardless of septic adequacy [00:26:14.000].
  • Exceptions (Not Required to Connect):
    • Any structure where sewer is not available (over 200 feet away) [00:14:25.000].
    • Existing SFDs/Duplexes with adequate septic systems, even if sewer is available. The requirement to connect upon sale of property (discussed during a July BOCC workshop) remains unresolved [00:17:39.000].
  • Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs): When connecting a new detached ADU to the sewer, all other structures on the property with plumbing must connect at that time [00:21:32.000].
  • Monty (Public Works Director): Explained the approach differs from conventional sewer codes by avoiding mandatory immediate connection for all properties within the 200-foot zone, prioritizing connection of the commercial core and new construction [00:27:20.000].
  • Commissioner Dean: Voted "no" on the idea of forcing hookup at the time of property sale, stating it forces people to do something they don't need to do [00:37:33.000].

Public Comments

  • Snowman (Online Attendee): Asked if existing homeowners eventually have to hook up. Monty confirmed the current draft says "no" as long as septic is adequate, but noted the "point of sale" discussion is still unresolved [00:34:56.000].
  • Attendee: Asked if adding a hand sink to a shop would require entire property connection. Monty clarified this would only be triggered if the septic system was deemed inadequate for the additional flow [00:22:52.000].

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Jefferson County Code (Title 18 and Chapter 815) referenced for definitions of "sewer available" and "on-site septic code" [00:13:52.000, 00:07:25.000].

Financials

No financial information discussed in context of connection requirements.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • The potential amendment to require connection at the time of property sale was discussed but remains unresolved in the draft code [00:18:01.000, 00:36:04.000].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational discussion on connection requirements.
  • Vote: Commissioner Dean provided informal dissent on the potential connection-at-sale amendment.
  • Next Steps: A final decision on the connection-at-sale requirement will be made at the time the ordinance is adopted [00:36:09.000].

Latecomer Agreements

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:29:46.000–00:34:27.000
  • Agenda Item: JCC 1308 (Latecomer Agreement discussion)
  • Categories: infrastructure, finance, real estate

Topic Summary

The latecomer process is a structured mechanism intended to allow developers (who pay to extend sewer lines) to recoup a proportional share of their costs from subsequent property owners (latecomers) who connect to that extension. The developer must file a latecomer document with the county before excavation starts. The county confirmed that the latecomer agreement period for a county utility (like sewer) is 20 years under RCW guidelines.

Key Discussion Points

  • Latecomer Definition: A property owner pays proportionally for connecting to a sewer line extension that was previously funded and installed by another developer who filed a latecomer agreement [00:31:30.000].
  • The payback is typically a linear foot proportional share of the extension cost [00:32:04.000].
  • Time Limit: The latecomer agreement period for the county is 20 years [00:40:17.000].
  • A fee is necessary for the county to process the latecomer paperwork [00:33:54.000].
  • If an ADU requires connection to a line extension, the property owner would pay the necessary latecomer fee [00:33:24.000]. If the ADU is infilling within the core established area and no latecomer document was filed for the original infrastructure, there is no latecomer fee [00:33:39.000].

Public Comments

  • Attendee: Asked if the latecomer fee would apply to properties (and all connections) that must connect later due to expansion (e.g., building an ADU) [00:30:31.000].
  • Attendee: Asked for clarification on the length of the latecomer agreement [00:34:22.000].

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • RCW (Revised Code of Washington) was referenced to confirm the latecomer agreement duration [00:34:22.000].

Financials

  • Latecomer application fee is listed in the appendix (but amount not stated) [00:33:59.000].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational discussion, confirming the latecomer period is 20 years.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: None specified.

Sewer Rates and Financial Projections (JCC 1305)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:38:38.000–00:51:03.000
  • Agenda Item: JCC 1305 Rates and Fees
  • Categories: finance, budgeting, services

Topic Summary

Chapter 1305 establishes rates and fees to cover the operation and maintenance (O&M) of the new sewer utility—the construction being covered primarily by grants. Due to a small initial user base, the proposed rates require a significant subsidy from the county's general fund to remain affordable compared to surrounding jurisdictions. Rates are structured differently for residential and non-residential properties. Residential properties pay a flat base rate, while commercial properties pay a base rate plus a consumption charge for water exceeding a 4,000-gallon threshold.

Key Discussion Points

  • System Construction Funding: Paid for largely by grants (Commerce, Ecology, EPA) and a small loan from Ecology (Public Infrastructure Funding - PIP) [00:38:57.000].
  • System Operation Funding: Paid for by monthly bills (base rate and consumption rate) [00:39:26.000].
  • Rationale for Rates/Incentives: To secure sewage flow to run the treatment plant and spread operational costs across more users [00:39:51.000].
  • Rate Adoption: Will occur via a separate Resolution, not within the ordinance itself [00:41:30.000].
  • Annual Increase: Rates are proposed to automatically increase yearly based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI/inflation) [00:41:38.000].
  • ERU Definition: Equivalent Residential Unit, defined as 4,000 gallons of water per month [00:45:12.000, 00:56:17.000].
  • Residential Rate Structure: Flat base rate; not tied to consumption (with an $80/month proposed base rate for single-family residences) [00:45:34.000].
  • Residential Breakdown (Proposed Monthly Base Rate):
    • Single Family Residence (1.0 ERU): $80
    • Duplex (0.9 ERU per dwelling unit): $72
    • ADUs and Multifamily (0.7 ERU per dwelling unit): $56
  • Non-Residential Rate Structure: Base rate ($80) PLUS a consumption rate for water use over 4,000 gallons per month (2.5 cents per gallon) [00:50:06.000].
  • High Strength Waste: Properties generating waste (e.g., from commercial processing, breweries, wineries) above a certain threshold (1,000 BODs) will incur an additional charge for the complexity of processing [00:51:40.000].

Public Comments

  • Attendee: Asked if rates would go down if more people connected. Monty noted the county is currently preparing to need to subsidize the operations for years to come (using general funds) and that rates are below the regional average [00:44:00.000, 00:37:33.000].
  • Snowman (Online Attendee): Confirmed with Monty and Sam Harper that residential rates are flat and not tied to usage, addressing a concern about watering a garden [00:56:06.000].

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Rates are based on a comprehensive rate study and 20-year operation and maintenance (O&M) budgets [00:41:03.000].
  • Comparative charts showed that Jefferson County’s proposed residential rates are towards the middle-bottom of surrounding jurisdictions [01:00:21.000].

Financials

  • Proposed Single Family Base Rate: $80 per month [00:45:51.000].
  • Non-Residential Consumption Rate: 2.5 cents per gallon over the 4,000-gallon base [00:50:42.000].
  • Example Non-Residential Cost: 8,000 gallons/month = $180 ($80 base + $100 consumption) [00:52:16.000].
  • O&M Subsidy: The estimated annual operating budget is $460,000. For 190 ERUs, the rate would need to be $202/month to break even; the $80 rate requires county subsidy [01:07:17.000].
  • Break-Even Point: Estimated at roughly 400 ERUs connected (could take 5–6 years) [01:09:44.000].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Commercial users may install an irrigation meter or apply to demonstrate if their water usage (e.g., nursery irrigation) is not entering the sewer system to avoid being charged based on high water usage [00:53:30.000].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational discussion on the proposed rate structure and subsidies.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: Future rate studies will occur as the system stabilizes after a year of operation [00:44:45.000].

Low Income Discount Program

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:41:40.000–00:44:00.000
  • Agenda Item: JCC 1305 (Low Income Discount)
  • Categories: services, finance

Topic Summary

The county is proposing a low-income discount rate set at 50% off the base rate for one ERU (resulting in a $40 flat fee for all residential categories). The program is designed to be highly inclusive, automatically enrolling any customer who is part of the PUD’s existing low-income program, and extends eligibility beyond PUD standards.

Key Discussion Points

  • Discount Rate: 50% off the base rate for one ERU (i.e., $40/month, applying to all residential categories which normally pay between $56–$80) [00:49:34.000].
  • Eligibility: Quite inclusive, based on factors such as 200% poverty rate, 80% AMI, or participation in Section 8 housing. Enrollment in the PUD's low-income program grants automatic eligibility for the sewer discount [01:43:38.000].
  • The PUD will administer the low-income program billing [01:44:08.000].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Low-Income Monthly Rate: $40 (50% of the $80 single-family base rate) [00:49:34.000].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Outlined the proposed low-income discount structure.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: None specified.

System Development Charges (SDCs) and Incentives (JCC 1305)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:16:39.000–01:23:25.000
  • Agenda Item: JCC 1305 (System Development Charges)
  • Categories: finance, infrastructure, planning

Topic Summary

System Development Charges (SDCs) are one-time payments intended to fund capital needs (maintenance, major repairs, future expansion), differentiating them from monthly operational rates. The proposed SDC is significantly lower than neighboring jurisdictions because the current system construction was mostly grant-funded. Current customers within the core area, covered by grant funding, will have the SDC waived entirely. For future connections outside the current grant phase, the SDC is deferred until 2028, beginning a tiered introduction toward the full $3,000 proposed rate.

Key Discussion Points

  • Purpose: SDCs fund capital needs, not operations [01:16:41.000].
  • Core Area Incentive: Properties within the core area connecting with current grant funding will not be assessed an SDC [01:17:20.000].
  • Future SDC Deferral: For properties outside the core or connecting later, the SDC is deferred until 2028, then tiered: $1,000 in 2028, $2,000 in 2029, and the full $3,000 in 2030 [01:17:55.000].
  • Low SDC Rationale: The $3,000 maximum SDC is low because the construction phase was paid primarily by grants (state and federal), meaning there are no large loans or bonds to repay [01:23:05.000].
  • Low-Income Housing Deferral: The ordinance proposes an SDC deferral for low-income housing projects (for non-profits). The SDC is waived entirely if the low-income status is maintained for 20 years; otherwise, the SDC is due if the use converts to market rate [01:20:25.000].
  • SDCs are based on Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs) [01:18:41.000].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Comparative chart (2023 data) showed surrounding jurisdictions often charge significantly higher SDCs (e.g., Bainbridge, Port Townsend, Poulsbo) [01:21:49.000].

Financials

  • Proposed Maximum SDC: $3,000 [01:17:55.000].
  • Tiered SDC (Starting 2028): $1,000 (2028), $2,000 (2029), $3,000 (2030) [01:17:46.000].
  • New Customer One-Time Fees: A new single-family residence connecting would pay the SDC + sewer application fee (couple of hundred dollars) + recording fees (estimated total $1,500 just for fees, before any SDC or construction costs later on) [01:30:36.000].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational discussion on SDCs and capital funding.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: None specified.

Core Area Connection Incentives

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:24:31.000–01:34:21.000
  • Agenda Item: Incentive programs
  • Categories: finance, infrastructure, operations

Topic Summary

The county is funding a generous incentive package for properties connecting within the core area while grant money is available. This package, facilitated by the contractor, covers nearly all costs associated with switching from septic to sewer. The incentive is tied to the current funding sources and is expected to cover all properties required to connect under the ordinance, though it may not cover voluntary connections by properties (like existing SFDs with functional septics) that are not currently required to hook up.

Key Discussion Points

  • Incentives covered by Grant Funding (Contractor Paid):
    • On-site installation of the grinder pump and line to the disconnect switch [01:24:42.000].
    • Line installation within the public rights-of-way (state, county, or easement) [01:25:29.000].
    • Cutting off existing lines at the building and decommissioning septic tanks [01:25:36.000].
    • Installation of grease interceptors for non-residential properties that currently lack them [01:26:01.000].
    • Recording fees for necessary property easements [01:26:22.000].
    • Environmental Health paperwork for septic decommissioning [01:26:40.000].
  • Property Owner Cost/Reimbursement: Owners are responsible for the electrical connection from their panel to the county-provided disconnect switch, but the county is offering a reimbursement program up to $2,500 for this work [01:25:06.000].
  • Grant Coverage Limit: The Project Manager believes the grants will cover all properties required to connect by the ordinance, but may not be sufficient for voluntary connections (e.g., single-family homes with adequate septic) [01:27:11.000, 01:31:13.000].
  • Estimated Cost for Future Voluntary Hookups (Post-Grant): An unsimplified, contracted hookup was estimated at nearly $40,000 (including associated fees like asphalt); a simplified hookup was estimated between $30,000–$40,000 [01:30:03.000].

Public Comments

  • Attendee: Asked if a septic tank could be repurposed into an infiltration trench for storm water instead of decommissioned. Sam Harper noted this would require inspection to ensure it is not used for sewer and is an unusual request [01:28:31.000].
  • Attendee: Asked if any residences are required to hook up in Phase One. Monty noted that because of the light-touch connection policy (JCC 1304), he does not believe any residences are required to connect, though many commercial properties are [01:32:47.000].

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Property Owner Electrical Reimbursement: Up to $2,500 [01:25:14.000].
  • Estimated Cost for Voluntary Hookup (Post-Grant): $30,000–$40,000 (plus SDCs after 2028) [01:30:03.000].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational presentation on the current grant-funded incentives.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: The county will pursue additional funding to support future connections once current grant money is exhausted [01:33:15.000].

Future Zoning and Land Use

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:34:38.000–01:36:23.000
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Public Comment/Future Planning)
  • Categories: planning, land use

Topic Summary

During public comment, the future land use of Port Hadlock post-sewer installation was raised. County staff confirmed that a change in zoning occurs when the sewer is connected, based on an existing zoning map. However, significant community-involved work to update the current zoning map (which was created many years ago) is anticipated in the coming years.

Key Discussion Points

  • Zoning Changes: Zoning changes occur when the sewer is hooked up [01:35:41.000].
  • Future Planning: Monty stated the county anticipates community engagement to update the existing, older zoning map, allowing the public to "weigh in on future zoning changes," but noted this is still "a couple of years off at least" [01:36:03.000].

Public Comments

  • Snowman (Online Attendee): Asked what Port Hadlock would look like in 10 years and expressed concern about it turning into a "mini Sequim or Poulsbo" [01:34:41.000, 01:36:17.000].

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational response about long-term planning.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: Community development work on zoning updates is planned for the coming years [01:36:08.000].

Pretreatment and Enforcement (JCC 1306 and 1307)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:37:41.000–01:42:08.000
  • Agenda Item: JCC 1306 (Pretreatment) and 1307 (Enforcement)
  • Categories: operations, ordinances, public safety

Topic Summary

The brief overview of the final chapters detailed pretreatment and enforcement provisions. The county is actively working on a Fats, Oil, and Greases (FOGS) program and will establish standards for discharge. Enforcement penalties will apply to misuse of the system, including fines or charging customers for the repair of their grinder pump if it is damaged by improper flushing. The system will initially contend with a learning curve as the makeup of sewage influence is unknown due to previous reliance on septics.

Key Discussion Points

  • FOGS Program: The county is currently working on a Fats, Oil, and Greases program, as well as standards for discharging [01:37:41.000].
  • Treatment Learning Curve: The initial makeup of the sewage is unknown, and system operators anticipate a "learning curve" in the first years [01:38:13.000].
  • Discharge Restrictions: The sewer is not taking mobile tanks (like RVs) at the treatment plant, but staff are working with Star Marine for tug discharge off North Water Street [01:38:21.000].
  • Enforcement: Violations for misuse are covered by provisions in the code [01:38:35.000].
  • Grinder Pump Repair: If a grinder pump fails due to improper materials put down the toilet, the property owner will be charged for the repair cost [01:40:32.000].

Public Comments

  • Attendee: Asked about enforcement for people who flush improper materials ("bag of rags") [01:39:27.000].
  • Sam Harper (Project Manager): Confirmed the county is developing educational materials (flyers) for property owners on what should and should not be flushed [01:40:06.000].

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Costs for grinder pump repair due to misuse will be charged to the property owner [01:40:32.000].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Informational presentation on the final chapters of the ordinance.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps: Staff will continue work on the FOGS and educational programs.

Ordinance Adoption Timeline

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:42:32.000–01:45:13.000
  • Agenda Item: Public Process and Next Steps
  • Categories: planning, services

Topic Summary

The special meeting was billed as the final public workshop before the formal public hearing on the proposed sewer ordinance. The public hearing is scheduled for November 18th, and it will be followed by the anticipated approval and adoption of the ordinance.

Key Discussion Points

  • Public Process: Included three prior workshops with the Board of County Commissioners [01:42:32.000].
  • Next Procedural Step: Public hearing (testimony before the commissioners) [01:42:44.000].
  • Ordinance Location: The draft ordinance and meeting presentation will be posted online on both the Public Works website (Port Hadlock Sewer page) and linked to the official hearing notice [01:45:05.000].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Established the timeline for ordinance adoption.
  • Vote: No action taken.
  • Next Steps:
  • - County Staff: Finalize the draft ordinance for release with the hearing notice [01:44:59.000].
  • - Board of County Commissioners: Hold Public Hearing on the sewer ordinance on November 18th [01:42:44.000].
  • - County Staff: Finalize and post the ordinance for approval after the hearing [01:42:44.000].