MEETING: Commissioners Meeting at Mon, Oct 21, 09:00 AM

County Sources

Packet Contents

AI Information

MEETING DATE: 2024-10-21 16:00:22+00:00

Procedural Matters: Call to Order, Attendance, and Agenda Changes

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:00:11.000–00:00:53.000
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Call to Order/Administrative)
  • Categories: operations, personnel, other

Topic Summary

The meeting of the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners (BOCC) was called to order. Commissioner Brotherton announced a dependency concerning his wife's medical process that would require him to leave early (at 02:00:22), intending to review the KPTZ radio schedule before his departure and continue the afternoon session from home.

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Brotherton noted he would have to leave the meeting to attend to his wife's medical process and would finish the afternoon session remotely [00:00:41].
  • Commissioner Brotherton requested to review the KPTZ schedule together at some point before he left [00:00:46].
  • The meeting was called to order by Commissioner Dean [00:00:21].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken; item was informational or deferred. - - [Commissioner Brotherton/Clerk]: Review KPTZ schedule before 02:00:22. - - [Commissioner Brotherton]: Attend the afternoon session remotely.

Public Comment: Solid Waste Facility Plans and Recycling Policy

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:01:31.000–00:02:51.000
  • Agenda Item: Public Comment
  • Categories: solid waste, infrastructure, planning

Topic Summary

The first public commenter sought clarification on the County’s plans for a proposed new solid waste transfer station, expressing concern about the potential site on Cape George Road, associated traffic impacts on narrow, potentially dangerous routes (Discovery Road), and the viability of expanding the current facility instead. The commenter also requested more information on public engagement opportunities for the planning process.

Key Discussion Points

  • Anonymous Commenter: Asked for clarification on the difference between a task force and an advisory board [00:01:31].
  • Anonymous Commenter: Raised concerns about plans to potentially relocate the dump to Cape George Road [00:01:45].
  • Anonymous Commenter: Mentioned that the current delay at the transfer station is minimal (under 15 minutes, except for equipment issues) [00:02:02].
  • Anonymous Commenter: Asked how large the proposed new facility would be and suggested existing unused nearby land (4-6 acres) could be used for expansion [00:02:10].
  • Anonymous Commenter: Expressed concern about increased traffic on Cape George Road and the risks associated with larger vehicles using narrow Discovery Road when diverting away from the Mill Road/light intersection [00:02:36].
  • Tom Tirsch: Referenced a recent PDN article about recycling and noted points raised at the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) by Laura Tucker that much of current recycling (dubbed "wish cycling") is ineffective [02:11:10].
  • Tom Tirsch: Stated that there is no market for glass, costing the county approximately $20,000 annually just to store it, potentially leading to landfill disposal at the County's expense [02:22:38].
  • Tom Tirsch: Recommended drastically overhauling the recycling program to focus solely on materials that are truly recyclable (like cardboard and aluminum/steel), urging the change be made immediately rather than gradually [02:33:32].

Public Comments

  • - [Anonymous]: Requested clarification on Solid Waste Task Force vs. Advisory Board roles, information accessibility for the public, and concerns about the potential Cape George Road location regarding traffic and cost.
  • - [Tom Tirsch]: Criticized current recycling efforts as "wish cycling" due to poor market conditions (especially for glass) and urged an immediate, complete overhaul of the County's recycling program.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Tom Tirsch: Referenced an article in the PDN and a presentation by Laura Tucker at the Solid Waste Advisory Committee meetings concerning recycling efficacy [02:11:10].

Financials

  • Tom Tirsch: The County is spending at least $20,000+ a year just to store unusable glass (non-recyclable) at the transfer station [02:22:42].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Anonymous Commenter: Suggested expanding the existing transfer station using 4-6 unused acres down below the current location [01:54:00].
  • Tom Tirsch: Recommended restricting the recycling program to only proven recyclable materials like high-quality cardboard, aluminum, and potentially glass and steel if a market can be found [02:30:02].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken; item was background context for later discussion.

Board Response: Solid Waste Facility, Task Force Distinction, and Recycling

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:44:45.000–02:51:33.000 (Initial Public Comment Response) and 03:00:28.000–03:07:07.000 (Commissioner Discussion Interlude with Public Comment)
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Public Comment Response)
  • Categories: solid waste, planning, infrastructure, services, budgeting, operations

Topic Summary

In response to public comments, Commissioner Dean and Commissioner Eisenhour clarified the distinction between an advisory board and a task force (time-limited vs. ongoing). Discussion confirmed that the Solid Waste Facilities Task Force is working on new site selection, noting that staff and consultants have narrowed potential locations to North County, Mid-County, and South County. The severe limitations of the current transfer station (wetland boundaries, closed landfill, traffic choke point) and the financial mechanics of recycling (an expense funded by garbage revenue) were detailed.

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Dean: Clarified that an advisory board is ongoing, while a task force has a defined end date after providing recommendations (e.g., the Solid Waste Facilities Task Force) [02:52:29].
  • Commissioner Dean: The Solid Waste Facilities Task Force met on October 9th; materials and minutes are available online [02:50:04].
  • Commissioner Dean: The task force is looking at the distinction between North County, Mid-County (around 104), and South County (around Beaver Valley or Center Road) sites [02:59:59].
  • Commissioner Dean: The number one problem with the existing transfer station is the inadequate commercial/private traffic flow due to scales located right at a wetland edge, preventing lane expansion [02:59:49].
  • Commissioner Dean: The closed landfill on the site is almost clean but cannot be repurposed for the facility [02:59:49].
  • Commissioner Dean: Staff and consultants initially looked at four sites, including one at Cape George Road, a mid-county site near the U-Haul, and South County sites [02:47:45]. No final location decision has been made, pending another task force meeting [02:59:03].
  • Commissioner Dean: A new facility will be funded through the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund (tipping fees), not a new tax or the General Fund [02:44:00].
  • Commissioner Dean: Fees are eroded every time the County recycles something; recycling costs money, which is subsidized by garbage disposal revenue (tipping fees) [02:44:00].
  • Commissioner Dean: A move to curbside collection by a third party would significantly lower the facility's carbon footprint [02:37:07].
  • Commissioner Dean: He favors a South County site (around Beaver Valley or Center Road) [02:37:07].
  • Commissioner Dean: Encouraged the public to contact Alcans at [email protected] to attend task force meetings [02:44:00].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Noted the County uses "source separation" (no single stream), leading to cleaner recycling materials and sometimes a better value than other municipalities, but reiterates recycling costs money [02:47:45].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: The ultimate decision on location will come to the BOCC after extensive public deliberation [02:57:07].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Stated that the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) accepts public comment at all meetings. The next SWAC meeting is tentatively scheduled for the first Thursday of December [03:00:28].

Public Comments

No public comment was offered during the Board's response segment.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • The new solid waste facility will be paid for by the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund (tipping fees), with no new taxes or General Fund allocation anticipated [02:44:00].
  • Recycling costs money, whereas disposing of garbage generates revenue [02:44:00].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Discussion included internal consideration of abandoning plastics recycling and possibly addressing the "wish cycling" issue [02:44:00].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action was taken. An external contact point for the Solid Waste Facilities Task Force was provided [02:44:00].

Public Comment: Jefferson County Food Bank Administration and Conflict

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:55:00–08:33.000 (Initial Public Comment) and 06:12:00–08:42.000 (Board Response Interlude)
  • Agenda Item: Public Comment
  • Categories: operations, services, personnel, contracts, construction

Topic Summary

Multiple public commenters criticized the management and executive director (Patricia Hennessy) of the Jefferson County Food Bank, citing a "caustic atmosphere," high volunteer turnover (30 quits, 8 fired without cause), and denial of service to a formerly active volunteer. Commenters also raised alarms regarding the stalled Quilcene Food Bank construction project, noting it stopped just before the roof was installed and ignored a donor's offer to pay for the roof and siding.

Key Discussion Points

  • Lisa Story, Hadlock: Reported being banned from the food bank property, denying her access to food, due to her peaceful petitioning and protest activities [03:04:00].
  • Lisa Story: Cited an instance where a volunteer named Rich yelled and cursed at her, yet she, the complainant, was banned instead of him being penalized [03:29:00].
  • Lisa Story: Accused Executive Director Patricia Hennessy of personal vendetta, "abusing volunteers," and wasting police time on minor non-criminal issues related to retrieving a key [04:23:00].
  • Anonymous Speaker: Presented a "performance evaluation" prepared by "Friends of the Food Bank" criticizing the "caustic atmosphere" created by Manager Patricia Hennessy [06:35:00].
  • Anonymous Speaker: Recommended the Executive Director Patricia Hennessy's contract not be renewed in November, advocating a return to volunteer management [07:36:00].
  • Anonymous Speaker: Claimed over 30 volunteers have quit and eight have been fired without cause under the current management [07:54:00].
  • Kit Kittredge, Quilcene: Former board member and volunteer reported on the long-stalled Quilcene Food Bank building project [08:42:00].
  • Kit Kittredge: The building project was nearing the roof phase in April but was stopped by a vote of the new board, following high turnover and the hiring of Patricia Hennessy [10:58:00].
  • Kit Kittredge: A local person offered to pay for the roof and siding in April, but the food bank board did not respond to the donor, causing the donor to look for other recipients [11:30:00].
  • Kit Kittredge: Noted Patricia Hennessy hired a Kitsap contractor instead of a local person for the project [11:54:00].
  • Shelly (via Zoom): Acknowledged that change is difficult and supported the new management, stating the food bank "had been going on for a long time without a lot of oversight," and the new management is trying to take it to the "next level" [17:16:00].
  • Shelly (via Zoom): Supported the construction of a new food bank but stressed the need for it to be done properly, suggesting it was not done so in the past [18:12:00].

Public Comments

  • - [Lisa Story, Hadlock]: Protested her ban from the food bank and alleged harassment and poor management by Executive Director Patricia Hennessy.
  • - [Anonymous Speaker]: Delivered a negative "performance evaluation" of the Executive Director, citing high volunteer turnover and a toxic atmosphere.
  • - [Kit Kittredge, Quilcene]: Expressed concern over the stalled Quilcene Food Bank construction project and the board’s failure to respond to a major funding offer.
  • - [Shelly (via Zoom)]: Supported the new management's efforts to increase oversight and felt the changes, while hard, were necessary to improve proper operation.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Kit Kittredge: Donors raised close to $50,000 for the Quilcene Food Bank and provided numerous in-kind donations (excavator, septic, surveyors) [10:01:00].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Anonymous Speaker: Proposed replacing the Executive Director and returning to a volunteer management model [07:40:00].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken on the Food Bank matter.

Board Response: Food Bank Oversight and Discord

Metadata

  • Time Range: 03:00:15.000–04:44:00 (Commissioner Dean) and 07:12:00–08:42:00 (Commissioner Eisenhour)
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Public Comment Response)
  • Categories: operations, services, legal, personnel

Topic Summary

Commissioners reflected on the persistent discord at the Jefferson County Food Bank. Commissioners acknowledged the high stakes (food delivery is a critical need) and the difficulty of organizational change but stressed that the Food Bank is an independent nonprofit, limiting the BOCC's power and legal oversight. The highest priority remains the continued delivery of food to the hundreds of families who depend on the service.

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Dean: Stated he wishes the BOCC had more "levers" to pull regarding the food bank [03:12:00].
  • Commissioner Dean: Acknowledged the reports of discord are challenging and concerning, but stated he doesn't know how to fix it [03:18:00].
  • Commissioner Dean: Emphasized the critical mission is delivering food, which the Food Bank has historically done well [03:33:48].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Stated she has attended two or three food bank board meetings but stressed the most important thing is getting food out, which is currently being done at all four locations [03:52:56].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: The Food Bank organization is likely going through a "serious growth period, transition, a period of change" following a complete change in leadership [03:55:15].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Stated that the Board of County Commissioners has very little—no legal—oversight over the independent nonprofit food bank, confirmed by asking "a number of people" [03:58:39].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Encouraged people who care about the organization to stay involved, despite the difficulty [03:55:15].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Noted the food bank is currently recruiting new board members via an application on their website [03:59:21].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: On the Quilcene building, acknowledged the new executive director, Patricia Hennessy, has engaged a contractor to oversee the project [03:59:52].
  • Commissioner Dean: Jested, "You shouldn't get involved," referring to Commissioner Eisenhour's continued attendance at food bank meetings, citing his own conflicts (being sued by former members of the board) [04:58:16].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action was taken; item was informational.

Public Comment: Homeless Services and Camp Sanitation Needs

Metadata

  • Time Range: 04:17:00–19:19:00
  • Agenda Item: Public Comment
  • Categories: services, public safety, public health, homelessness, legal

Topic Summary

A commenter (Maggie) raised concerns about the principle of leveraging mandated service participation for homeless individuals, citing Washington State Justice William O. Douglas on human rights. The commenter shifted focus to advocate for better sanitation infrastructure at the current encampment, noting health hazards due to the removal of one porta-potty (reducing the total from three to two) and lack of sanitizer.

Key Discussion Points

  • Maggie: Stated that some service providers in Jefferson County believe that if homeless people don't utilize and sign up for services (allowing their information to be "exploited" and monetized), they should be criminalized [12:50:00].
  • Maggie: Argued that voluntary participation in services is a civil and human right [14:13:00].
  • Maggie: Cited Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, noting the current crisis involves lack of basic necessities: showers and toilets [14:33:00].
  • Maggie: Alleged there were initially three porta-potties at the camp, but one has been removed, leaving only two [14:45:00].
  • Maggie: Requested reinstating the third porta-potty and increasing the servicing frequency due to the current units posing a "biohazard" [14:45:00].
  • Maggie: Requested hand sanitizer be replenished in the attached wall vessels [15:01:00].

Public Comments

  • - [Maggie]: Advocated for preserving civil rights regarding voluntary participation in services for the homeless and urgently requested the reinstatement and frequent servicing of a third porta-potty at the camp due to public health biohazard risks.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Maggie: Suggested homeless individuals prioritize showers and toilets (hierarchy of needs) over signing up for other provider data/services [14:33:00].
  • Commissioner Dean: Encouraged utilization of the emergency shelter over unmanaged encampments [35:53:00].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action was taken. - - [Commissioner Brotherton/Dean]: Follow up with Public Health to determine why the third porta-potty was removed and whether there are best practices or standards regarding the ratio of toilets to people at encampments [43:13:00].

Public Comment: South County Deputy Budget Request

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:54:30.000–02:00:52.000 (Shelly via Zoom) and 02:00:54.000–02:05:52.000 (Jean via Zoom)
  • Agenda Item: Public Comment & Response
  • Categories: public safety, budgeting, services, infrastructure

Topic Summary

Two South County residents (Shelly and Jean) advocated for the Undersheriff's 2025 budget request for a dedicated South County Sheriff's Deputy. They argued the area is currently underserved, reporting rampant timber theft resulting in destructive environmental and economic impacts. The speakers highlighted that a unique funding opportunity exists: the Undersheriff only requested funds for the personnel, as the Pleasant Harbor developer is willing to provide an office and a patrol car via an upcoming MOU.

Key Discussion Points

  • Shelly (via Zoom): Thanked Undersheriff Pernsteiner for requesting a South County deputy in the 2025 budget [01:59:45].
  • Shelly (via Zoom): Noted that the Undersheriff requested funding for just the officer, as funds for a car were taken out, making it a lesser expense [01:59:45].
  • Shelly (via Zoom): Pointed out that the MOU with Pleasant Harbor will provide a paid office and a sheriff's car [01:59:45].
  • Shelly (via Zoom): Suggested that presence of a deputy would encourage residents who currently "feel unheard" to start reporting crimes that will "grow the duties for this deputy" [01:59:45].
  • Jean (via Zoom): Agreed on the need for coverage, noting that the Sheriff's Department and Black Point developer were not communicating about a mutual solution for coverage until citizens intervened [01:59:45].
  • Jean (via Zoom): Highlighted "rampant and incredibly destructive" timber theft activity in the South County (Snow Creek, Penny Creek, Dosie Roads), which is currently going unchecked [02:00:45].
  • Jean (via Zoom): Argued that timber theft converts public assets (tax benefits for junior taxing beneficiaries) into private gain for thieves [02:00:45].

Public Comments

  • - [Shelly (via Zoom)]: Supported the South County deputy request, noting low budget strain due to the Pleasant Harbor MOU providing a car and office space.
  • - [Jean (via Zoom)]: Supported the deputy request, citing rampant timber theft and lack of communication between the Sheriff and developers regarding shared solutions.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • The inclusion of a South County deputy in the 2025 budget is projected as a lesser expense than normal, as a vehicle and office space are expected to be provided by the Pleasant Harbor Developer MOU [01:59:45].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action was taken. The item was flagged for future budget discussions.

Board Response: South County Deputy and Law Enforcement Capacity

Metadata

  • Time Range: 04:03:00–04:44:00
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Public Comment Response)
  • Categories: public safety, budgeting, operations, planning

Topic Summary

Commissioners expressed strong support for the inclusion of a South County Deputy in the upcoming budget, recognizing the long response times (30–40 minutes) and the acknowledged crime incidents in the area. Commissioner Dean noted the complexity of adopting the deputy as one of "many budget asks." Commissioner Eisenhour suggested seeking a role that would be more finely tuned, including mental health or navigator skills, questioning if the need amounted to a "40 hours a week of patrol work." Discussion also touched upon the timing of the BlackPoint developer's contribution (5 years in the future) versus the immediate need.

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Expressed support for funding the South County Sheriff position due to the 30–40 minute response time for the area [04:03:00].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Expressed hope the position would be funded in the next year, leveraging the Pleasant Harbor offer for space and capacity [04:11:13].
  • Commissioner Dean: Supported the ask but stressed it must be considered "as part of a balanced budget" among many other department needs [04:11:13].
  • Commissioner Dean: Cautioned that while the BlackPoint issue is helpful, it is "five years from now" and distinct from the immediate need for a County deputy [04:12:05].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Suggested exploring the possibility of combining the deputy role with mental health training or "navigator skills" if 40 hours of strict patrol work are not needed [04:44:00].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

The position is a budget ask that must be balanced against other department needs [04:11:34].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Suggested exploring a modified role that includes mental health training or navigator skills [04:44:00].
  • Commissioner Dean: Encouraged the BlackPoint developer arrangement, noting the need now is acute [04:12:05].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken; the item is to be prioritized in upcoming budget discussions.

Proclamation of Pro Bono Law Week

Metadata

  • Time Range: 00:51:46.000–01:00:35.000
  • Agenda Item: Proclamation for Pro Bono Law Week
  • Categories: services, legal, other

Topic Summary

The Board adopted a proclamation declaring October 20th to October 26th, 2024, as Pro Bono Law Week, honoring the Clallam-Jefferson County Pro Bono Lawyers for providing critical free legal services to low-income residents, particularly concerning issues like housing, domestic violence, and debt. Raphael Erquia, representing the organization, highlighted their key accomplishments (750+ hours of service in 2023) and future goals, including establishing better connections with tribal communities and hiring a full-time attorney.

Key Discussion Points

  • Raphael Erquia (Pro Bono Board): Thanked the BOCC for continuous support [00:52:55].
  • Raphael Erquia: Noted that civil legal issues disproportionately affect the disadvantaged and regularly include domestic violence, housing, and credit issues [00:53:35].
  • Raphael Erquia: Reported that in 2023, Clallam-Jefferson County Pro Bono Lawyers provided over 750 hours of service [00:57:04].
  • Raphael Erquia: Highlighted Ted Howard, an attorney at Pro Bono, who has helped hundreds with landlord-tenant issues [00:54:13].
  • Raphael Erquia: Outlined 2025 objectives: 1) Establish better connections with tribal communities; 2) Hopefully hire a full-time attorney (the current service relies solely on volunteers) [00:54:34].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Expressed gratitude for the services, noting the startling statistic that nearly three in four Washington residents face urgent civil legal issues, and personally reflected on needing legal assistance over the past year [00:58:05].
  • Commissioner Dean: Asked if the organization considered using generative AI to help scale services, suggesting it might be appropriate for certain-level cases [00:59:11].
  • Raphael Erquia: Responded that AI has not been discussed yet but agreed that it could potentially fill a resource gap for certain types of cases affecting the disadvantaged within the next 2-5 years [01:00:09].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Proclamation for Pro Bono Law Week: Stated that nearly 3 in 4 Washington residents face urgent civil legal issues annually, but less than 25% receive legal help [00:56:19].

Financials

  • No direct fiscal cost associated with the proclamation [00:57:42].
  • The Pro Bono organization is researching hiring a full-time attorney (currently only volunteers provide legal services) [00:55:07].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to adopt the Proclamation for Pro Bono Law Week (October 20th–26th, 2024).
  • Vote: Unanimous (Ayes: Dean, Eisenhour, Brotherton).
  • Next Steps:
  • - [Pro Bono Board]: Begin work on 2025 objectives: tribal community outreach and hiring a full-time attorney.

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:00:51.000–01:01:21.000
  • Agenda Item: Consent Agenda
  • Categories: services, contracts, budgeting, operations, other

Topic Summary

The Board quickly approved the Consent Agenda for October 21st, 2024. This included several substantive agreements regarding Human Services (Recovery Café/Jumping Mouse Mental Health) and JeffCom 911 Equipment grants.

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Dean: Mentioned the agenda contained "lots of good BHAC stuff" (Behavioral Health Advisory Committee items) [01:01:07].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

Approved Consent Agenda Items (from Meeting Packet, not explicitly discussed in depth): - Cancellation of Unclaimed Warrants Exceeding One Year: Resolution to cancel 35 outstanding claims warrants and 1 payroll warrant (total $5.56 to $331.50). - CDBG-Public Service Funding 2024-2025 Hearing Notice: Notice of hearing to approve $106,000 for homeless services, including water/sanitation access at Caswell-Brown Village (administered by OlyCAP). - UW School of Public Health Practicum Field Experience MOA: Zero-cost memorandum allowing UW Public Health students to train at JCPH. - WA Department of Ecology Agreement for Conservation Corps Crew Restoration Activities: $11,080 agreement for 8 days of Washington Conservation Corps crew time for environmental restoration/disaster services. - Agreement with Dove House Advocacy Services for the Recovery Café ($171,327 total): Two-year contract (2025–2026) for operating the Recovery Café using Behavioral Health Sales Tax funds (Fund 131). - Agreement with Jumping Mouse Children’s Center for Mental Health Services ($226,283 total): Two-year contract (2025–2026) for trauma-informed mental health services for children 2-12, funded by Behavioral Health Sales Tax (Fund 131). - JeffCOM 911 Equipment Grant Contract (E25-062): $46,411 reimbursement contract from WA State Military Department for E911 equipment expenses. - Agreements for Public Health and Juvenile Court Services (2025-2026): MOU for Referred-Becca Petitions Project ($30,000) and an agreement with Olympic Angels ($26,713) for youth/families in foster care, both using 1/10th of 1% Behavioral Health Sales Tax Fund.

Financials

All financial items referenced in the supporting documents were approved as presented.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to adopt the Consent Agenda for October 21st, 2024.
  • Vote: Unanimous (Ayes: Dean, Eisenhour, Brotherton).
  • Next Steps: Administrative staff to execute all approved agreements and resolutions.

Public Hearing: 2024 Third Quarter Budget Appropriations and Extensions

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:01:24.000–01:26:32.000
  • Agenda Item: Proposed 2024 Third Quarter Budget Appropriations and Extensions
  • Categories: budgeting, finance, operations, infrastructure, legal, services

Topic Summary

The Board held a public hearing for the proposed 2024 Third Quarter supplemental budget appropriations and extensions, totaling a net increase of $2,497,890 in revenue and $2,117,526 in expenses across all funds before an amendment. Finance staff explained the increase largely resulted from receiving state grants and better understanding budget trends that were unanticipated at the beginning of the year. The proposed budget included capital and planning items, notably: Sherriff's Office equipment (wellness, truck, jail software); IT server migration to the Sheriff's Office facility (for resiliency); and funds for the Irondale Community Park expansion acquisition. A late amendment was introduced to remove a $209,004 projected increase for Risk Pool liability insurance.

Key Discussion Points

  • Finance Manager Judy Shepherd: Explained that the heavier third-quarter lift is common as many state grants (which follow a July 1st fiscal year) are reconciled and department budget trends become clearer later in the year [01:02:23].
  • General Fund/Sheriff: Grants offset the cost of an Officer Wellness Program, the latter half of the Jail Control Panel Server/Software, and replacement of a rescue truck (funded by Title III) [01:05:18].
  • General Fund/Superior Court: Received grants for security cameras and a lactation project [01:05:59].
  • General Fund/Non-Departmental: $57,071 for capital outlay for Gravity Budget Software (new budget book software) [01:07:28].
  • General Fund/Housing Fund (148): $24,902 transfer of unspent 2023 award to Habitat for Humanity was approved [01:14:27].
  • Department of Community Development (DCD 143): $250,000 internal transfer from the general fund to assist with cash flow issues due to backlog. Expenditures include startup costs for the Fire Marshal's office and a Ford Lightning electric truck [01:12:55].
  • Water Quality: Received a grant for $181,000 for the Hoh River Resiliency Project, funding professional services to enhance spawning habitat and reduce flood risk [01:11:18].
  • Public Health: Received $434,000 in early (pre-payment) Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS) grants, usually not expected until the following year [01:09:30].
  • Roads/Public Works (Fund 180): $17,714 General Fund transfer needed to cover a shortfall in expected Secure Rural Schools (SRS)/PILT funding to give Public Works the contracted full amount [01:15:55].
  • Parks Improvement (Fund 175): $16,482 transfer from the CIP fund to purchase a private property parcel within the Irondale Community Park boundary, enabling forest thinning for aesthetics, park values, and improving vehicle sight-distance at an intersection [01:15:00].
  • Information Services: $716,000 capital outlay for the large server transfer project from the courthouse to the more seismically sound Sheriff's office facility (which has generator backup) [01:17:31].
  • Risk Pool Correction: Initial request of $209,004 for Risk Pool Liability Insurance was canceled upon review, as the premium budget account was sufficient [01:07:52].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Questioned the process for approving capital expenditures like the Irondale Park land purchase, noting lack of clarity on how such items fit into the Capital Improvement Plan outside the formal Capital Committee [01:18:35]. The Administrator committed to re-engaging the Capital Committee process and ensuring Finance is represented [01:20:15].

Public Comments

  • No public comment was provided during the public hearing [01:24:26].
  • Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Phil Hunsucker confirmed no written correspondence had been received for the hearing [01:24:32].

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • 2024 Third Quarter Budget Appropriations/Extensions Hearing: Details the specific line-item increases and decreases across numerous departments and funds.

Financials

  • Pre-Amendment Totals: Total Revenue Increase $2,497,890; Total Expense Increase $2,117,526.
  • Amendment: Removal of $209,004 for Risk Pool - Liability Insurance.
  • Amended Final Totals (Resolution Approval):
    • General Fund Total (Revised): $676,467 increase
    • Total All Funds (Revised): $1,908,522 increase

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Amendment: Staff proposed and the Board accepted removal of $209,004 appropriation for Risk Pool liability insurance.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve the resolution adopting the third quarter 2024 budget appropriations and extensions, as amended, removing the $209,004 Risk Pool line item.
  • Vote: Unanimous (Ayes: Dean, Eisenhour, Brotherton).
  • Next Steps: The new appropriations and extensions are officially adopted and integrated into the 2024 budget.

Approval of Settlement Agreement with Julie St. Marie

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:40:48.000–02:50:59.000
  • Agenda Item: Not Stated (Unscheduled Action following Executive Session)
  • Categories: legal, local government operations

Topic Summary

Following a preliminary Executive Session, the Board unanimously approved a civil settlement agreement with Julie St. Marie, who had been suing the County and five employees since November 2022. The County recently won a summary judgment dismissing all 14 of Ms. St. Marie’s claims. The primary benefit of the zero-dollar monetary settlement is Ms. St. Marie's agreement to withdraw all her pending and extremely disruptive Public Records Act (PRA) requests related to the lawsuit, saving the County significant staff time and public resources.

Key Discussion Points

  • Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Phil Hunsucker: Explained the background: Ms. St. Marie's case, which involved federal court and multiple county employees, was dismissed when the County won a summary judgment on August 29th [02:42:57].
  • Phil Hunsucker: The settlement was pursued to prevent either party from filing an appeal within the 30-day window [02:43:23].
  • Phil Hunsucker: Stressed the core benefit of the settlement: Ms. St. Marie agrees to dismiss "all of her pending Public Records Act requests" within five days of signing [02:44:39].
  • Phil Hunsucker: Confirmed the settlement is a zero-dollar payment, involving no county money [02:44:05].
  • Phil Hunsucker: Noted the case was disruptive, requiring seven or eight county people to be deposed, and thanked the legal team (specifically Laura Michelson, the legal assistant) and the Risk Pool for their work [02:46:12].
  • Commissioner Eisenhour: Expressed her appreciation for the work and her gladness that the issue is now resolved, noting it was an "unfortunate use of public resources" [02:48:41].

Public Comments

  • No public comment was provided on this topic, which was added to the agenda unexpectedly after Executive Session [02:47:32].

Supporting Materials Referenced

No supporting materials referenced.

Financials

  • Settlement Amount: $0.00.
  • The case, since November 2022, incurred significant costs associated with depositions and the immense staff time required to fulfill Ms. St. Marie’s Public Records Act requests [02:46:06].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

  • Decision: Motion to approve the settlement agreement with Julie St. Marie.
  • Vote: Unanimous (Ayes: Dean, Eisenhour, Brotherton).
  • Next Steps:
  • - [BOCC/Clerk]: Sign the settlement agreement immediately (as requested by legal counsel due to urgency) [02:50:04].
  • - [Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney]: File the agreement to conclude the case.

Commissioner Briefing: Mobile Home Park Update (B&R and Hadlock)

Metadata

  • Time Range: 01:38:58.000–01:53:30.000
  • Agenda Item: Commissioner Briefing (Mobile Home Parks)
  • Categories: housing, planning, legal, infrastructure

Topic Summary

Commissioner Dean provided an update following the previous week's public concerns about the impending sales of two mobile home parks (B&R and Hadlock). Based on a follow-up conversation with owner Don Tucker, the parks are not currently under contract. Although a local nonprofit is interested in preserving them as affordable housing, the owner indicated the property status would likely remain mobile home parks due to the sheer cost of redevelopment. Commissioners discussed measures like potentially adopting zoning protections (like Whatcom County’s resolution) and restoring previous exceptions on septic system replacement that could hinder re-development. The urgent state legislative need is a bill that gives residents a "right to buy."

Key Discussion Points

  • Commissioner Dean: Confirmed that the mobile home parks (150 units each) are not currently under contract [01:40:34].
  • Commissioner Dean: Noted the asking price for the two parks is around $20 million [01:41:59]. Investors are unlikely to convert the land to another use due to the cost basis [01:42:02].
  • Commissioner Dean: Indicated that rent increases are a likely outcome of any sale (even to a Resident-Owned Community, or ROC) due to capital costs and the anticipation of future tenant protection legislation [01:43:03].
  • Commissioner Dean: Suggested looking at a resolution, similar to Whatcom County's, to protect the zoning [01:42:51].
  • All Commissioners: Expressed concern that residents are "totally beholden" and supported state legislation that would give residents a time period (e.g., six months’ right to buy) once a park is listed for sale [01:46:51].
  • Commissioner Dean: Mentioned the owner denied code violation allegations and reaffirmed the typical process is to file a complaint and let the system prioritize investigations (with septic being high priority) [01:43:19].
  • Commissioner Dean: Followed up on a past issue: the requirement that putting a new mobile home on a lot is considered "new construction" and requires a new septic system, which acts as a barrier to unit replacement [01:49:10].
  • Commissioner Brotherton: Said he would meet with a resident (Lee Christensen) the next day to assess the situation [01:50:17].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • Whatcom County Resolution: Referenced as a potential zoning tool for mobile home park protection [01:42:51].
  • Washington State Senate Bill 5876: Referenced as failed legislation to grant residents a right-to-buy period [01:44:47].

Financials

  • Total Asking Price: $20 million for two parks (300 units) [01:41:59].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Commissioner Dean: Suggested amending the Comprehensive Plan to look at zoning protection or re-examining the septic system requirements that prevent home replacement [01:42:10].
  • Resident Moratorium: Discussion included a recent call for a moratorium on sales but determined it was too prescriptive for the BOCC [01:51:07].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken. The item remains informational/planning. - - [Commissioner Brotherton]: Meet with Lee Christensen (resident) the next day to get an update. - - [Administrator/Legal Counsel]: Follow up on the feasibility of re-examining septic rules and exploring a zoning tool (like a Whatcom County resolution) to support mobile home park preservation. - - [Commissioners]: Discuss adding a right-to-buy mobile home park bill to the legislative agenda.

Commissioner Briefing: Status of Washington Conservation Corps Crew Activities

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:00:22.000–02:05:39.000
  • Agenda Item: Commissioner Briefing (Non-Agenda Item)
  • Categories: operations, information technology, bargaining, public safety, planning

Topic Summary

The County Administrator provided a detailed schedule of his activities between October 14th and 21st, covering diverse departmental activities, including IT infrastructure planning, budget reviews, and progress on public safety bargaining.

Key Discussion Points

  • IT/Infrastructure: Attended a "large meeting" discussing migrating EPL (financial) and MUNIS systems (ERP) to the cloud [02:02:21].
  • Labor Relations: Negotiating team reached an agreement with the deputies bargaining unit and expects to bring the agreement before the Board soon [02:03:41].
  • Finance: Met after the budget committee meeting to "sort of digest" the budget discussion [02:03:24].
  • Planning/CWPP: Met with DCD Director Josh Peters regarding implementation of the Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) [02:04:11].
  • Executive/Legal: Participated in the Washington County Administrators Association meeting, where the primary subject was indigent defense caseload standards [02:04:21].
  • Transportation (Gateway Center): Met with directors of Clallam and Jefferson Transit regarding plans to pave the parking lot at the Olympic Gateway Visitor Center to improve bus service connectivity [02:01:50].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

N/A

Financials

No specific dollar amounts discussed other than references to the ongoing negotiations and budget committee review.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken; informational review. - - [Administrator]: Meet with Clallam/Jefferson Transit to finalize site plan and grant applications for Olympic Gateway Visitor Center.

Commissioner Briefing: Transit, Forestry, and Wildfire Planning

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:12:34.000–02:22:54.000
  • Agenda Item: Commissioner Briefing (Non-Agenda Item)
  • Categories: local government operations, services, public safety, forestry, environment, arts & culture

Topic Summary

Commissioner Eisenhour provided an overview of her previous week, focusing on Public Health and environmental issues. This included progress on Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) implementation, a positive update on the County’s collaborative forestry efforts with DNR (Trust Land Transfer), celebration of the Nurse Family Partnership, and signature verification training for elections.

Key Discussion Points

  • Forestry: Met with Mallory, highlighting the successful collaborative relationship with DNR to prioritize conservation (Trust Land Transfer/Deba Bay Natural Area expansion) north of 104 and avoiding controversial timber harvests [02:13:05].
  • CWPP: Staff are actively working on developing a shared Gantt chart tool to track progress on implementing the massive year-long Community Wildfire Protection Plan projects, stressing the long-term benefit to local communities [02:14:54].
  • Arts: Attended the opening ceremony for the second piece of salvaged art at the Transfer Station (created by Margie McDonald using the Japanese shibori wood-burning technique) [02:15:51].
  • Elections: Completed signature verification training with the State for upcoming elections [02:16:41].
  • Public Health: The Board of Health discussed extending the timeline for a consumer Public Health position vacancy and authorized exploring a stipend for non-elected Board of Health members to help retention [02:29:51].
  • Public Health: Celebrated 25 years of the Nurse Family Partnership [02:30:22].
  • Public Health: Received an update on the first possible cases of avian flu in agricultural workers in Southeast Washington [02:30:09].
  • Housing: Attended the Housing Solutions Network presentation on their housing survey, noting two-thirds of respondents prefer detached units but would entertain duplexes, triplexes, or townhouses, with a preference for smaller units [02:27:30].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

N/A

Financials

  • The Board of Health is exploring paying a stipend to non-elected members, funded from within Public Health's existing budget [02:29:51].

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken; informational review.

Commissioner Briefing: Hood Canal Bridge Project and Regional Transit Planning

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:30:42.000–02:37:07.000
  • Agenda Item: Commissioner Briefing (Non-Agenda Item)
  • Categories: transportation, infrastructure, legal, environment

Topic Summary

Commissioner Dean discussed the unexpected news that WSDOT plans an $85 million preservation/maintenance project on the Hood Canal Bridge (replacing the deck), with $50 million sourced from federal highway funds. This news, which hit the media on Thursday, was completely unknown to the 27 jurisdictions present at the Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization (PRTPO) retreat on Friday, generating frustration about lack of consultation. Commissioners and PRTPO partners are concerned the project will absorb available funding, preclude operational/design changes (like an elevated section) to reduce unscheduled openings, and ignore juvenile steelhead mortality concerns.

Key Discussion Points

  • WSDOT Bridge Project: WSDOT announced an $85 million preservation and maintenance project for the Hood Canal Bridge (replacing 3,400 feet of deck) [02:32:32]. $50 million of this is federal funding [02:34:55].
  • Coordination Failure: None of the 27 jurisdictions at the PRTPO retreat were aware of the $85M project prior to the news announcement [02:31:21].
  • Project Impact: This unexpected project is forcing WSDOT to cut other long-planned projects, specifically delaying the Mill Road intersection project [02:35:14].
  • Policy Concern: PRTPO and the County are worried that investing $85 million will lock WSDOT into future decisions, making them less willing to consider operational/design changes (like an elevated section) to reduce future bridge openings [02:31:32].
  • Environmental Concern: Although WSDOT committed to considering steelhead mortality (90% of juveniles die at the bridge), they stated the project is maintenance-only with "no design changes" [02:33:02].
  • Lobbying Strategy: The County plans to act as a "squeaky wheel" to ensure WSDOT keeps jurisdictions "up to speed, if not at the table," and does not sacrifice operational improvements or fish issues [02:32:25].
  • PRTPO Retreat: Confirmed the PRTPO retreat was valuable for identifying regional opportunities, challenges, and helping WSDOT prioritize using a large mapping exercise [02:36:10].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

N/A

Financials

  • Hood Canal Bridge Project: $85 million total cost, with $50 million coming from federal funds [02:32:32].
  • The project is forcing WSDOT to cut other projects like the Mill Road intersection [02:35:14].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Operational Change: Alternatives discussed include pushing WSDOT to pursue design options that reduce unscheduled bridge openings [02:31:32].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken. The County will work with its lobbyist and PRTPO partners to maintain pressure on WSDOT regarding project transparency and design constraints.

Final Commissioner Briefing Items

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:37:38.000–02:39:29.000
  • Agenda Item: Commissioner Briefing (Non-Agenda/Final Items)
  • Categories: recreation, services, construction, operations

Topic Summary

Commissioner Dean concluded his briefing by reporting on activities related to local infrastructure and services, including the Olympic Discovery Trail and the transition of the Fairgrounds manager.

Key Discussion Points

  • Olympic Discovery Trail (ODT): Attended the opening of the Hal Bates Memorial ODT Viewpoint (a structure designed by the Jamestown Totem Pole Carver), noting the complexity of land ownership (Land Trust owns; Fish & Wildlife will take ownership with easements) [02:37:38].
  • Fairgrounds: Attended a farewell dinner for outgoing Fairgrounds Manager Brian Curry; a new executive director will start the following week [02:38:18].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

N/A

Financials

No financial information discussed.

Alternatives & Amendments

No alternatives discussed.

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No action taken; informational review.

Workshop: Determining State and Federal Legislative Priorities

Metadata

  • Time Range: 02:52:19.000–05:07:31.000
  • Agenda Item: Determining State and Federal Legislative Priorities Workshop
  • Categories: planning, budgeting, infrastructure, housing, legal, environment, services

Topic Summary

Commissioners and the County Administrator, joined by lobbyist Stephanie Wright (Strategies 360) and Treasurer Stacie Prada, held a workshop to collaboratively set state and federal legislative and capital priorities for the 2025 session. The goal was to consolidate a targeted agenda, distinguishing between issues where the County should be the primary lead/advocate, and those where it should merely monitor or support the larger Washington State Association of Counties (WASAC) platform. The discussion centered on five policy/support items and four main capital asks, to be refined into a final one-page agenda by the lobbyist.

Key Discussion Points

  • Lobbyist Role (Stephanie Wright): Delineated her role as the "guided missile" to track legislation and provide strategy, with commissioners serving as the "loudest voice" (the "trump card") for public advocacy and testimony at key times [03:10:21].
  • WASAC Alignment: Commissioners agreed to prioritize a concise county-specific agenda (3-5 items) and use the WASAC platform for monitoring and general support [03:07:37]. The board tends to be highly aligned on these issues [04:28:47].
  • Coordination (Treasurer's Role): Treasurer Prada attended to ensure alignment between county and Waco (treasurer/assessor/auditor) priorities, offering to provide data support quickly as needed during the session [03:13:45].

Policy & Advocacy Priorities (Agreed)

  1. Housing Fund/Excise Tax (RCW 82.46.75): Lead Priority. Advocate for removal of the caveat in the statute that currently prevents all but one county (San Juan) from imposing an Excise Tax for an affordable housing fund. This is a small, technical fix that would greatly benefit Jefferson County [04:25:46].
  2. Mobile Home Park Legislation (Rent Control/Right to Buy): Lead Priority. Seek partnership with a freshman legislator (former LA to Kevin Van De Wege) to explore reintroducing a bill that would protect residents by giving them sufficient time (e.g., 6 months) to consider purchasing the mobile home park if it goes up for sale [04:45:17].
  3. Producer Responsibility/Recycling (WRAP Act): Strong Support/Lead. The County will be a unique voice in supporting this bill (which WASAC generally opposes), citing the current local crisis of paying money to store non-marketable glass [04:39:55].
  4. Affordable Housing O&M and Vouchers: Lead Priority. Advocate for more state funding linked to capital projects for Operations & Maintenance (O&M) and perpetual vouchers for affordable housing, as capital projects often stall due to lack of subsidy support [04:44:13].
  5. Transportation Benefit District (TBD) Authority: Support/Monitor. Support WASAC efforts to expand local TBD authority (allowing for higher local sales tax levies for transportation projects), while reserving the right to prioritize other local public safety taxes [04:43:24].
  6. Land Use Flexibility (Lammards/UGA): Monitor/Influence. Continue to advocate for broader flexibility in zoning within Limited Areas of More Intensive Rural Development (Lammards) and Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), recognizing the difficulty of this request (opposed by previous Governor) [04:32:41].

Capital Priorities (To Be Refined)

  1. Emergency Shelter/Caswell Brown Village Completion: #1 Priority. Secure the necessary gap funding (expected $1M-$2M) to complete the shelter, contingent on the status of the current Congressional Directed Spending (CDS) request and the acute need due to the shelter's current lease expiring in June [04:49:19].
  2. Mill Road/Highway 20 Roundabout: High Priority Transportation Ask. The key infrastructure intersection where WSDOT pulled its roundabout plan due to local objection; funding for design/planning is sought (likely from federal transportation-specific funds) [04:58:01].
  3. Child Care Early Learning Center Gap Funding: Urgent Pending Need. A shortfall in funding is anticipated pending bid results (expected by year-end); a state ask may be needed to cover inflationary cost increases [05:00:21].
  4. Aquatic Center Design Funds: Aggressive Ask. Explore seeking design funds for the proposed mid-county aquatic center (possibly managed by a future Public Facilities District, PFD), aiming for a 2025 ask to align with a potential 2026 local ballot measure [04:55:02].
  5. Additional Monitoring/Future: Keep the Solid Waste Facility (new transfer station) and South County Community Centers (USDA community facilities program) on the radar for future capital funding cycles [05:01:05].

Public Comments

No public comment on this topic.

Supporting Materials Referenced

  • WASAC Legislative Priorities: Referenced for all housing, land use, and transportation items.
  • RCW 82.46.75: Referenced for Housing Fund Excise Tax discussion.
  • Senate Bill 5876: Referenced for Mobile Home Park legislation.
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP): Referenced as a source for future fire-related capital asks.

Financials

  • Childcare Center/Emergency Shelter: Multiple projects face inflationary cost shortfalls, requiring the County to seek new state/federal funds to bridge the gap [05:00:21].
  • Aquatic Center: Seeking design funds in the state capital budget (estimated $300k to $1M range) to support a larger local PFD bond measure [04:55:02].
  • Housing Fund Tax: Proposal seeks authorization for new local tax revenue (Excise Tax on home sales) to fund affordable housing [04:25:46].

Alternatives & Amendments

  • Road Projects: Agreed Mill Road is the top transportation priority over other Washington State Department of Transportation items [04:58:01].
  • Prioritization: Agreed to use Stephanie Wright and a small team (Mark McCauley, incoming legislative liaison) to refine the list based on feasibility, timeline, and funding source (state capital, federal CDS/grants) [05:04:10].

Outcome, Vote, and Next Steps

No vote taken on the agenda itself. The discussion established a concrete list of priorities for follow-up and advocacy. - - [Stephanie Wright/Administrator/Commissioner Brotherton]: Meet privately to review capital asks (Mill Road, Aquatic Center) with more technical detail (numbers, phasing, timelines) [05:04:10]. - - [Stephanie Wright/Commissioners]: Schedule an outreach meeting with the legislative delegation post-election to socialize priorities and seek a bill sponsor [05:05:43]. - - [Stephanie Wright/Legislative Liaison]: Create a final one-page legislative agenda and a session "playbook" for the Board by late November/early December [05:04:35]. - - [Commissioner Eisenhour]: Take over as the primary liaison for legislative efforts (LSC) [03:19:47].

Generated On: 2025-11-07 14:11:20.336100-08:00 By: google/gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 running on https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/